Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Republic denial of travel on DL AC >

Republic denial of travel on DL AC

Notices

Republic denial of travel on DL AC

Old 10-18-2019, 03:02 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 420
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers View Post
A little thread drift but........if Skywest interpretation of a FOM non-flying event being actionable for certificate by FAA.........

could they jerk my ticket for for FOM violations like...wearing a Halloween tie?..... a St Patties day tie?.... or wing tip shoes.......my hair being on my collar? .....mustache beyond the corner of my mouth?

Heard Skywest wasn't allowing JS by United pilots nor a flow back to open seats.

Heard it ended when United pilots who were denied the JS started taking names.....senior capt's with no desire to leave scaring the shiznit outta the FO's who want to bail at first opportunity worried they might be blackballed
Good to know that the FOM is only a suggestion at United and doesn't have to be followed. btw, that story of the SkyWest Captain denying a non-revving United CA was made up.
greatmovieistar is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:09 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,814
Default

Originally Posted by greatmovieistar View Post
Good to know that the FOM is only a suggestion at United and doesn't have to be followed. btw, that story of the SkyWest Captain denying a non-revving United CA was made up.
But you signing the agreement that was presented was not.
Shrek is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:28 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,258
Default

Originally Posted by greatmovieistar View Post
Good to know that the FOM is only a suggestion at United and doesn't have to be followed. btw, that story of the SkyWest Captain denying a non-revving United CA was made up.
The FOM jumpseat priority could have been modified in 5 minutes by a bulletin. As it was UAL pilots were allowed prior and no change to the FOM was made. The FOM was smoke and mirrors period.
What the Skywest pilots fail to understand was when the ability of the Captain to offer the jumpseat was established by ALPA the very first tenant was that it never be politicized or used as a weapon regardless of relationships between pilot groups. Management still ultimately controls the jumpseat. If it creates issues for them it just might go away. The pilots who created the privilege of the jumpseat fully understood that concept. Sadly the Skywest pilots seem unable to grasp the issue.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:32 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 420
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The FOM jumpseat priority could have been modified in 5 minutes by a bulletin. As it was UAL pilots were allowed prior and no change to the FOM was made. The FOM was smoke and mirrors period.
What the Skywest pilots fail to understand was when the ability of the Captain to offer the jumpseat was established by ALPA the very first tenant was that it never be politicized or used as a weapon regardless of relationships between pilot groups. Management still ultimately controls the jumpseat. If it creates issues for them it just might go away. The pilots who created the privilege of the jumpseat fully understood that concept. Sadly the Skywest pilots seem unable to grasp the issue.
So at United not only is it encouraged to ignore your FOM they also encourage pilots to not stand with their pilot group and Union. Got it.
greatmovieistar is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 03:53 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Der Meister's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 320A
Posts: 909
Default

It's quite simple skywest isn't union and they were sticking it to their union counterparts. Why we allow them their pilots to further their career with out being a union company is beyond me. Having been a part of a real union in the past this was verboten. You had to be a card carrying member to advance your career. I don't know why alpa allows this to happen but it just shows that alpa is more about the $ then they are about any union...
Der Meister is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 04:10 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by greatmovieistar View Post
So at United not only is it encouraged to ignore your FOM they also encourage pilots to not stand with their pilot group and Union. Got it.
i think you fail to understand it wasn't a violation of your FOM...that was just the line SAPA was feeding you to get you on board.
tunes is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 04:42 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,190
Default

So Greatmovie....since you want to weigh in ....on the Delta forum no less.....could you answer my questions that I brought up before.....here let me help you out and repost them again for you insight....




"If Skywest interpretation of a FOM non-flying event being actionable for certificate by FAA.........

could they jerk my ticket for for FOM violations like...wearing a Halloween tie?..... a St Patties day tie?.... or wing tip shoes.......my hair being on my collar? .....mustache beyond the corner of my mouth?"

These are all Delta FOM violations BTW


What do you think.....FAA actionable or not?
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 07:42 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,249
Default

Originally Posted by greatmovieistar View Post
Good to know that the FOM is only a suggestion at United and doesn't have to be followed. btw, that story of the SkyWest Captain denying a non-revving United CA was made up.
False....I personally know a UAL WB Capt that was denied a JS earlier this week as he was trying to non-rev home after finishing a trip in EWR.
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 07:52 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
False....I personally know a UAL WB Capt that was denied a JS earlier this week as he was trying to non-rev home after finishing a trip in EWR.
Was he jumpseat or nonrev?
OOfff is offline  
Old 10-18-2019, 08:21 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 420
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
False....I personally know a UAL WB Capt that was denied a JS earlier this week as he was trying to non-rev home after finishing a trip in EWR.
Actually nothing you said above refuted my post. Nobody refused a pilot non-reving in the back. Nor can they. Just so you know jumpseating and non-reving are two separated things.
greatmovieistar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
magnus0322
Republic Airways
140
06-14-2014 04:54 PM
Hal9000
Major
37
05-18-2011 01:29 PM
av8tordude
Regional
2
09-03-2008 05:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices