Split Pairings
10-17-2019, 08:34 AM
#21
Rerouted On Weekends
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Originally Posted by waldo135
There’s a 70ish person imbalance between CAs and FOs in NYC. Until that’s fixed, it makes it tough not to split the pairings.
10-17-2019, 08:47 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,126
Originally Posted by Jaww
Honest question, did the last AE fix it then? I understand it’s a 270 day conversion.
10-17-2019, 08:55 AM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Wind checker
Posts: 763
Originally Posted by GuardPolice
Well, dang. I guess they forgot to give the optimizer the memo 
GP
GP
Everyone knows what they said but if a person actually believes that they are going to change a thing while making said record profits, they are probably going to be disappointed.
If they are not hiring over replacement numbers, next summer will be exactly like this one.
10-17-2019, 08:58 AM
#24
Rerouted On Weekends
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Originally Posted by hvydvr
The management here is run by numbers focused people. The company just declared record profits.
Everyone knows what they said but if a person actually believes that they are going to change a thing while making said record profits, they are probably going to be disappointed.
If they are not hiring over replacement numbers, next summer will be exactly like this one.
Everyone knows what they said but if a person actually believes that they are going to change a thing while making said record profits, they are probably going to be disappointed.
If they are not hiring over replacement numbers, next summer will be exactly like this one.
10-17-2019, 11:47 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,504
Originally Posted by waldo135
There’s a 70ish person imbalance between CAs and FOs in NYC. Until that’s fixed, it makes it tough not to split the pairings.
10-18-2019, 09:34 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Drivin’ the bus
Posts: 717
Originally Posted by sailingfun
Post what they said please. I can’t find any reference to it but I do remember it was posted somewhere.
From JG’s memo:
“We’re reducing split rotations. Base staffing imbalances combined with training constraints resulted in the use of
split rotations to balance available reserve levels across the system. Going forward, we will use split rotations as little as possible, reducing the volume of change in an FDP.”
So, technically, if they’ve reduced the number of split pairings by exactly one, well they’ve met their stated goal of “reducing.”
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
10-18-2019, 09:47 AM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Pilots when asked if a smooth landing is ideal:
“Well, yes, but there are other considerations which might make other actions ideal for the circumstances”
Also pilots, when told full-kitting is sometimes ideal:
“Why aren’t we eliminating split pairings entirely?”
“Well, yes, but there are other considerations which might make other actions ideal for the circumstances”
Also pilots, when told full-kitting is sometimes ideal:
“Why aren’t we eliminating split pairings entirely?”
10-18-2019, 05:02 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 428
Originally Posted by OOfff
Pilots when asked if a smooth landing is ideal:
“Well, yes, but there are other considerations which might make other actions ideal for the circumstances”
Also pilots, when told full-kitting is sometimes ideal:
“Why aren’t we eliminating split pairings entirely?”
“Well, yes, but there are other considerations which might make other actions ideal for the circumstances”
Also pilots, when told full-kitting is sometimes ideal:
“Why aren’t we eliminating split pairings entirely?”
10-18-2019, 06:38 PM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 320A
Posts: 909
Originally Posted by OOfff
Neither is the constant whining of pilots about every tiny thing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
