![]() |
Phone Polling
Why are we doing phone polling only? An online poll can be completed at any time that is convenient for the people being polled and an online poll will not be blocked by my phone. I just saw the email from the union about it showing up as “Spam Likely.” I have received numerous of those calls and ignore them. How much are we paying to have people call and ask how likely we would support something? It’s time to move to the 20th century and do online polling.
|
I'm guessing they'll say self selection bias. That said, I'm sure they could easily accomplish the same thing with an online survey emailed to the sampling groups, along with the phone calls. I don't mind them calling, they just have to have the ability to call back at a time that is better for me (which I've heard they will do). Just put the number in your contacts and it won't show up as spam.
|
Originally Posted by crewdawg
(Post 2956482)
I'm guessing they'll say self selection bias. That said, I'm sure they could easily accomplish the same thing with an online survey emailed to the sampling groups, along with the phone calls. I don't mind them calling, they just have to have the ability to call back at a time that is better for me (which I've heard they will do). Just put the number in your contacts and it won't show up as spam.
That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known.. |
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 2956494)
That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known..
|
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 2956494)
Exactly. Unless you get a very high percentage of respondents (over 60%) the data is pretty skewed. (Think CNN or FOX online poll)
That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known.. |
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956525)
The issue of not enough participants and skewing data isn’t unique to online polling. That is true with any poll that only samples a small portion of a group.
|
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 2956557)
True, but scientific polling can take a much smaller sample with a much more accurate result.
Think "Who will you vote for?" or "What is the thing you like/hate most about our brand." In my experience, ALPA tries hard, but the polling is usually all over the place with leading questions and insane hypotheticals. There's just too many variables when you're dealing with 14,000+ pilots who all want different things. Better than nothing, I guess. |
I would agree. Only so many questions you can ask on a poll, or so many details you can get into.
The Dalpa pollster is outstanding and has very unbiased questions. The problem arises when the Reps start don’t get the result they expect and start forcing questions on him. This was very evident in last years polling. |
Originally Posted by RonRicco
(Post 2956557)
True, but scientific polling can take a much smaller sample with a much more accurate result.
|
They did an online survey. Not enough people took the time to fill it out. They had to extend the deadline multiple times trying to get higher participation.
Phone polling works much better with a small sample size. It’s very accurate. |
Originally Posted by bugman61
(Post 2956614)
They did an online survey. Not enough people took the time to fill it out. They had to extend the deadline multiple times trying to get higher participation.
Phone polling works much better with a small sample size. It’s very accurate. |
I was wondering who was calling me everyday. My spam blocker app kept blocking it.
|
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956616)
So participation rates are higher with phone? I know the online poll for scheduling was around 60% if I recall.
Participation rates for phone polling are much lower. It’s a controlled sample so you don’t need to have a a large number as self selection bias is minimized. |
Originally Posted by bugman61
(Post 2956776)
Participation rates for phone polling are much lower. It’s a controlled sample so you don’t need to have a a large number as self selection bias is minimized.
|
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956778)
Can you explain controlled sample? Are they targeting specific groups for phone polling and not just doing random samples?
|
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956778)
Can you explain controlled sample? Are they targeting specific groups for phone polling and not just doing random samples?
The way is was explained to me, the pollster takes known demographic information, then develops a "call order" for which pilot to contact first, second, third, etc. within each group. Then the goal is the get as much feedback quickly before other events change the perspective of respondents. "How would you rate your contract compared to peer airlines?" changes the day UAL, American, or others get a deal, or the stock market crashes...so they try to get "same day" (my term) responses. So the timing is the final element of "controlled sample". Based on the comments some reps have made in the past regarding polling, there are some who don't trust data gathered scientifically. I asked my former Capt rep in MSP what his problem was with the polling, and his reply was, "It's too neutral!" |
Originally Posted by Karnak
(Post 2956797)
Within the context of ALPA's polling? It's done by a very experienced pollster who ensures the sampling is done by demographic. Age, category, Regular, Reserve, commuter, etc. The larger the sample, the more accurate the data. Another control is the specificity of the question(s). The more binary the question (yes or no), the more accuracy.
The way is was explained to me, the pollster takes known demographic information, then develops a "call order" for which pilot to contact first, second, third, etc. within each group. Then the goal is the get as much feedback quickly before other events change the perspective of respondents. "How would you rate your contract compared to peer airlines?" changes the day UAL, American, or others get a deal, or the stock market crashes...so they try to get "same day" (my term) responses. So the timing is the final element of "controlled sample". Based on the comments some reps have made in the past regarding polling, there are some who don't trust data gathered scientifically. I asked my former Capt rep in MSP what his problem was with the polling, and his reply was, "It's too neutral!" |
I was called on the last round each time I was busy and unable to take the call. But I did fill out the online survey, personally I'd much rather do that because then I'm not in a time constraint and can answer when I have time.
|
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956806)
Thanks. I guess I didn’t realize it was targeted to demographics.
Contrasting that with an online survey, the more passionate you are, the more likely you are to respond. So a so called “vocal minority” can skew the results. The problem is that while they are vocal, if you don’t have a huge response rate (>75%) you don’t know if they are a minority or not. You can correct for this somewhat by doing phone polling at the same time but it’s not perfect. Online surveys are great for getting ideas and long-form feedback but that’s about it. |
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956601)
What makes phone polling vs online polls scientific?
Let’s make it simple. Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror. Phone polling is so 1960s. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.
Let’s make it simple. Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror. Phone polling is so 1960s. |
Originally Posted by fishforfun
(Post 2956601)
What makes phone polling vs online polls scientific?
|
I would think the best process would be a combination of phone and online polling. For example, the selection process is still done by phone. If you don’t answer they could leave a callback number to take the poll at convenience or perhaps provide a unique PIN code and link to go answer the questions online. This way, the selection process continues to be a “random sample” rather than a regular open poll that may not be answered by a cross section of the group.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 2956992)
Methods and statistical confidence.
|
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.
Let’s make it simple. Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror. Phone polling is so 1960s. When I talk to Captains I fly with about the surveys, and they say they don't answer the phone, my response is, "fine, I do and that just means my opinion is considered and yours isn't". It's their choice to answer or not. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.
Let’s make it simple. Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror. Phone polling is so 1960s. It's far more important to get an actual feeling of the pilot group over the ones that are most outspoken. They get just as many votes as those of us who have more important things to do than fill up forums with retirement restoration nonsense. Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by bugman61
(Post 2956839)
Contrasting that with an online survey, the more passionate you are, the more likely you are to respond. So a so called “vocal minority” can skew the results. The problem is that while they are vocal, if you don’t have a huge response rate (>75%) you don’t know if they are a minority or not. You can correct for this somewhat by doing phone polling at the same time but it’s not perfect. Online surveys are great for getting ideas and long-form feedback but that’s about it.
Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :) Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 2957450)
Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :)
Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 2957450)
Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :)
Scoop |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 2957506)
Inconceivable!
|
If they can choose to call a certain phone number to reach an individual of a specific demographic, surely they could selectively email an online poll to specific individuals just as easily. They also could include data from only the first X respondents of a given demographic if they want that control over equally representing the different demographics.
|
Originally Posted by QuirkyJules
(Post 2958034)
If they can choose to call a certain phone number to reach an individual of a specific demographic, surely they could selectively email an online poll to specific individuals just as easily. They also could include data from only the first X respondents of a given demographic if they want that control over equally representing the different demographics.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands