Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Phone Polling (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/126668-phone-polling.html)

fishforfun 01-14-2020 07:56 AM

Phone Polling
 
Why are we doing phone polling only? An online poll can be completed at any time that is convenient for the people being polled and an online poll will not be blocked by my phone. I just saw the email from the union about it showing up as “Spam Likely.” I have received numerous of those calls and ignore them. How much are we paying to have people call and ask how likely we would support something? It’s time to move to the 20th century and do online polling.

crewdawg 01-14-2020 08:16 AM

I'm guessing they'll say self selection bias. That said, I'm sure they could easily accomplish the same thing with an online survey emailed to the sampling groups, along with the phone calls. I don't mind them calling, they just have to have the ability to call back at a time that is better for me (which I've heard they will do). Just put the number in your contacts and it won't show up as spam.

RonRicco 01-14-2020 08:25 AM


Originally Posted by crewdawg (Post 2956482)
I'm guessing they'll say self selection bias. That said, I'm sure they could easily accomplish the same thing with an online survey emailed to the sampling groups, along with the phone calls. I don't mind them calling, they just have to have the ability to call back at a time that is better for me (which I've heard they will do). Just put the number in your contacts and it won't show up as spam.

Exactly. Unless you get a very high percentage of respondents (over 60%) the data is pretty skewed. (Think CNN or FOX online poll)

That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known..

crewdawg 01-14-2020 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by RonRicco (Post 2956494)
That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known..

The phone number is in the e-mail. Make it a contact and it will be known.

fishforfun 01-14-2020 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by RonRicco (Post 2956494)
Exactly. Unless you get a very high percentage of respondents (over 60%) the data is pretty skewed. (Think CNN or FOX online poll)

That being said, there needs to be a way to hit the people like me who send almost all calls to VM that aren’t known..

The issue of not enough participants and skewing data isn’t unique to online polling. That is true with any poll that only samples a small portion of a group.

RonRicco 01-14-2020 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956525)
The issue of not enough participants and skewing data isn’t unique to online polling. That is true with any poll that only samples a small portion of a group.

True, but scientific polling can take a much smaller sample with a much more accurate result.

deltabound 01-14-2020 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by RonRicco (Post 2956557)
True, but scientific polling can take a much smaller sample with a much more accurate result.

I think this might be true for narrowly tailored surveys.

Think "Who will you vote for?" or "What is the thing you like/hate most about our brand."

In my experience, ALPA tries hard, but the polling is usually all over the place with leading questions and insane hypotheticals. There's just too many variables when you're dealing with 14,000+ pilots who all want different things.

Better than nothing, I guess.

RonRicco 01-14-2020 09:54 AM

I would agree. Only so many questions you can ask on a poll, or so many details you can get into.

The Dalpa pollster is outstanding and has very unbiased questions. The problem arises when the Reps start don’t get the result they expect and start forcing questions on him.

This was very evident in last years polling.

fishforfun 01-14-2020 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by RonRicco (Post 2956557)
True, but scientific polling can take a much smaller sample with a much more accurate result.

What makes phone polling vs online polls scientific?

bugman61 01-14-2020 10:52 AM

They did an online survey. Not enough people took the time to fill it out. They had to extend the deadline multiple times trying to get higher participation.

Phone polling works much better with a small sample size. It’s very accurate.

fishforfun 01-14-2020 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by bugman61 (Post 2956614)
They did an online survey. Not enough people took the time to fill it out. They had to extend the deadline multiple times trying to get higher participation.

Phone polling works much better with a small sample size. It’s very accurate.

So participation rates are higher with phone? I know the online poll for scheduling was around 60% if I recall.

tom14cat14 01-14-2020 11:57 AM

I was wondering who was calling me everyday. My spam blocker app kept blocking it.

bugman61 01-14-2020 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956616)
So participation rates are higher with phone? I know the online poll for scheduling was around 60% if I recall.



Participation rates for phone polling are much lower. It’s a controlled sample so you don’t need to have a a large number as self selection bias is minimized.

fishforfun 01-14-2020 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by bugman61 (Post 2956776)
Participation rates for phone polling are much lower. It’s a controlled sample so you don’t need to have a a large number as self selection bias is minimized.

Can you explain controlled sample? Are they targeting specific groups for phone polling and not just doing random samples?

CBreezy 01-14-2020 03:03 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956778)
Can you explain controlled sample? Are they targeting specific groups for phone polling and not just doing random samples?

A controlled sample inherently means random. In order to get any useful data, they have to sample pilots from across the company.

Karnak 01-14-2020 03:07 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956778)
Can you explain controlled sample? Are they targeting specific groups for phone polling and not just doing random samples?

Within the context of ALPA's polling? It's done by a very experienced pollster who ensures the sampling is done by demographic. Age, category, Regular, Reserve, commuter, etc. The larger the sample, the more accurate the data. Another control is the specificity of the question(s). The more binary the question (yes or no), the more accuracy.

The way is was explained to me, the pollster takes known demographic information, then develops a "call order" for which pilot to contact first, second, third, etc. within each group. Then the goal is the get as much feedback quickly before other events change the perspective of respondents. "How would you rate your contract compared to peer airlines?" changes the day UAL, American, or others get a deal, or the stock market crashes...so they try to get "same day" (my term) responses. So the timing is the final element of "controlled sample".

Based on the comments some reps have made in the past regarding polling, there are some who don't trust data gathered scientifically. I asked my former Capt rep in MSP what his problem was with the polling, and his reply was, "It's too neutral!"

fishforfun 01-14-2020 03:19 PM


Originally Posted by Karnak (Post 2956797)
Within the context of ALPA's polling? It's done by a very experienced pollster who ensures the sampling is done by demographic. Age, category, Regular, Reserve, commuter, etc. The larger the sample, the more accurate the data. Another control is the specificity of the question(s). The more binary the question (yes or no), the more accuracy.

The way is was explained to me, the pollster takes known demographic information, then develops a "call order" for which pilot to contact first, second, third, etc. within each group. Then the goal is the get as much feedback quickly before other events change the perspective of respondents. "How would you rate your contract compared to peer airlines?" changes the day UAL, American, or others get a deal, or the stock market crashes...so they try to get "same day" (my term) responses. So the timing is the final element of "controlled sample".

Based on the comments some reps have made in the past regarding polling, there are some who don't trust data gathered scientifically. I asked my former Capt rep in MSP what his problem was with the polling, and his reply was, "It's too neutral!"

Thanks. I guess I didn’t realize it was targeted to demographics.

Der Meister 01-14-2020 04:05 PM

I was called on the last round each time I was busy and unable to take the call. But I did fill out the online survey, personally I'd much rather do that because then I'm not in a time constraint and can answer when I have time.

bugman61 01-14-2020 04:05 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956806)
Thanks. I guess I didn’t realize it was targeted to demographics.



Contrasting that with an online survey, the more passionate you are, the more likely you are to respond. So a so called “vocal minority” can skew the results. The problem is that while they are vocal, if you don’t have a huge response rate (>75%) you don’t know if they are a minority or not. You can correct for this somewhat by doing phone polling at the same time but it’s not perfect. Online surveys are great for getting ideas and long-form feedback but that’s about it.

gzsg 01-14-2020 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956601)
What makes phone polling vs online polls scientific?

In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.

Let’s make it simple.

Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror.

Phone polling is so 1960s.

fishforfun 01-14-2020 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.

Let’s make it simple.

Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror.

Phone polling is so 1960s.

I guess in my naïveté I assumed we did that.

Bucking Bar 01-14-2020 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by fishforfun (Post 2956601)
What makes phone polling vs online polls scientific?

Methods and statistical confidence.

StartngOvr 01-15-2020 04:31 AM

I would think the best process would be a combination of phone and online polling. For example, the selection process is still done by phone. If you don’t answer they could leave a callback number to take the poll at convenience or perhaps provide a unique PIN code and link to go answer the questions online. This way, the selection process continues to be a “random sample” rather than a regular open poll that may not be answered by a cross section of the group.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

notEnuf 01-15-2020 08:42 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 2956992)
Methods and statistical confidence.

Theoretical sample and actual sample are two very different things. My wife was a marketing research analyst and she used to hate the inherent data collection problems with phone sampling. 9-5 M-F to lines where people actually answer after caller ID was 90% retirees. After business hours even fewer answered because of the telemarketing hours of 5-8. Weekends, fugedabowit. The data centers end up adjusting the calling parameters just to get a large enough sample and fill the responses by any means to meet a deadline.

iaflyer 01-15-2020 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.

Let’s make it simple.

Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror.

Phone polling is so 1960s.

Well for people like us who interact with a message forum like this, a online survey seems easy. But for the older crowd, or those who don't like technology as much, not as many would fill it out. Then, when the MEC tries to use the data to establish priorities, some LEC members might complain that certain demographics weren't represented. I think saying "tough" doesn't fly.

When I talk to Captains I fly with about the surveys, and they say they don't answer the phone, my response is, "fine, I do and that just means my opinion is considered and yours isn't". It's their choice to answer or not.

CBreezy 01-15-2020 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by gzsg (Post 2956871)
In my opinion the people we are paying insane money for phone polling have sold us that free online polling is no good.



Let’s make it simple.



Poll every Delta pilot online. If the pilots who don’t bother get the short straw, they need to look in the mirror.



Phone polling is so 1960s.

But that still doesn't provide valuable data. Just because a pilot doesn't take a survey doesn't mean they won't vote. If you ignore their opinion because they didn't remember or have motivation or couldn't remember their log in, etc to do a usually monstrous survey online does not mean they will just have to accept the contract they get. They will vote and if you just "give them the short straw" they will vote no. And all that time and money was completely wasted.

It's far more important to get an actual feeling of the pilot group over the ones that are most outspoken. They get just as many votes as those of us who have more important things to do than fill up forums with retirement restoration nonsense.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Scoop 01-15-2020 11:45 AM


Originally Posted by bugman61 (Post 2956839)
Contrasting that with an online survey, the more passionate you are, the more likely you are to respond. So a so called “vocal minority” can skew the results. The problem is that while they are vocal, if you don’t have a huge response rate (>75%) you don’t know if they are a minority or not. You can correct for this somewhat by doing phone polling at the same time but it’s not perfect. Online surveys are great for getting ideas and long-form feedback but that’s about it.


Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :)

Scoop

FangsF15 01-15-2020 12:40 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 2957450)
Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :)

Scoop

Careful, Scoop. you know what happened to The Dread Pirate Roberts right after he said that... :p

Big E 757 01-15-2020 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 2957450)
Vocal minority? Along with R.O.U.S’s, I don’t think they exist. :)

Scoop

Inconceivable!

Kjazz130 01-15-2020 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by Big E 757 (Post 2957506)
Inconceivable!

I do not think that means what you think it means.

QuirkyJules 01-16-2020 08:17 AM

If they can choose to call a certain phone number to reach an individual of a specific demographic, surely they could selectively email an online poll to specific individuals just as easily. They also could include data from only the first X respondents of a given demographic if they want that control over equally representing the different demographics.

CBreezy 01-16-2020 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by QuirkyJules (Post 2958034)
If they can choose to call a certain phone number to reach an individual of a specific demographic, surely they could selectively email an online poll to specific individuals just as easily. They also could include data from only the first X respondents of a given demographic if they want that control over equally representing the different demographics.

The last part doesn't solve for self-selection bias.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands