Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Road to the TA 20-02 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/126905-road-ta-20-02-a.html)

Trip7 01-26-2020 05:41 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2964449)
I think I can see why the company asked for the mediator. They probably can tell a lot of pilots would be against this.



It seems it would be better to have a medical retirement vehicle. That alone could be a massive savings in retirement but I know there is tricare for many or most so I'm sure that's a sticking point.



Maybe just more money and let me figure it out.

Agree 100%. The Union is not only spending a significant amount of negotiating capital trying to implement a retirement vehicle the majority of pilots don't want, they are using misleading communications to promote it the the pilots. They've been doing this since the initial R&I Roadshow. Even a couple posters here have used similar talking points and as most can see any pilot with basic knowledge of finance and investing can see right thru it.

IMO the MBCBP is not a viable solution for the majority of Delta pilots and should be dropped from our ask immediately.



Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

FangsF15 01-26-2020 05:42 AM


Originally Posted by Dorn (Post 2964469)
Well the issue with a “medical retirement” plan is just turn on the TV. Seems like there is a ever growing desire to go to a government Medicare system. Not my wishes but what happens to our money in say 10-15 years from now if that becomes a reality?

Simple fix. Have an “out” clause if ever the Govt takes over healthcare (God help us if they do).

Trip7 01-26-2020 05:52 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 2964460)
Even nearly 25 years from retirement that's a big deal to me because I could see that draining a lot of savings.

I like the concept of the VEBA. Now a 5% return on a VEBA I'll take because very very few investors can beat a triple tax advantaged account with a taxable one. Petitioning the IRS to allow pilots to limit the amount of DPSP Cash that goes into the VEBA would be a big win. Although VEBA funds do not pass on to your estate, I think it's a good trade-off for tax free dollars going towards the largest expense for most retirees

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Dorn 01-26-2020 05:53 AM


Originally Posted by FangsF15 (Post 2964473)
Simple fix. Have an “out” clause if ever the Govt takes over healthcare (God help us if they do).

ya I’m sure that’s could be arranged. Just making the point I am always incredibly weary of “promises” I 100% know what I intend to do with my money but large plans such as a medical retirement that becomes obsolete in some point in the future is not comforting at all. What tax rate is that money taxed at? Is it my money or some fund? What is the growth of said money for the time is sat in a fund for a future promise that is now obsolete?

The medical plan we have now has the HSA fund. That is 100% tax free front and back end. That’s my money that I can use for virtually anything (in the medical sphere) which is very lose. And it’s investible so you can save up to $7100 max contribution per year. That’s easily 200k if you start and have years to go. (Or at least a very healthy chunk of cash pending on your retirement date) Plus worse case if the medical system goes public well it’s still 100% your money. Kind of hard to turn that down.

crewdawg 01-26-2020 06:05 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2964482)
I like the concept of the VEBA. Now a 5% return on a VEBA I'll take because very very few investors can beat a triple tax advantaged account with a taxable one. Petitioning the IRS to allow pilots to limit the amount of DPSP Cash that goes into the VEBA would be a big win. Although the VEBA is not pensionable, I think it's a good trade-off for tax free dollars going towards the largest expense for most retirees.

I agree that a VEBA could be a huge win with the right language...the triple tax benefit is a huge benefit. That said, after the abysmal sell job on pretty crappy language last time, I think our MEC would have big battle to ever get one here.

Tailhookah 01-26-2020 06:06 AM


Originally Posted by Dorn (Post 2964483)
ya I’m sure that’s could be arranged. Just making the point I am always incredibly weary of “promises” I 100% know what I intend to do with my money but large plans such as a medical retirement that becomes obsolete in some point in the future is not comforting at all. What tax rate is that money taxed at? Is it my money or some fund? What is the growth of said money for the time is sat in a fund for a future promise that is now obsolete?

The medical plan we have now has the HSA fund. That is 100% tax free front and back end. That’s my money that I can use for virtually anything (in the medical sphere) which is very lose. And it’s investible so you can save up to $7100 max contribution per year. That’s easily 200k if you start and have years to go. (Or at least a very healthy chunk of cash pending on your retirement date) Plus worse case if the medical system goes public well it’s still 100% your money. Kind of hard to turn that down.

HSA can’t be used if someone is on the DPMP. So it’s not available to all.

Tailhookah 01-26-2020 06:14 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 2964265)
What are you talking about? The s&p historical return is about 10% per year on average long term.


True. I was talking about in years when the S&P is in the red. Misunderstood that I meant long term average.

If if there’s a better alternative to it let’s hear about it.

What I don’t understand the pushback to a plan that will essentially give us a 9% raise (in addition to a raise in pay rates) but masked in a retirement vehicle that is in addition to our 401k. While our 401k is maxed, anymore DC is fruitless, so we need something additional. While not as good as 401k rules, I’ve not seen where there is something that not only is available but what can be negotiated due to tax write offs for Delta on the MBCBP.

We are are at the limits. The MBCBP May be all we have available that works for both sides and is negotiable.

FangsF15 01-26-2020 06:25 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2964489)
HSA can’t be used if someone is on the DPMP. So it’s not available to all.

Or Tricare... Not that I'm complaining at all, just some folks don't know.

Denny Crane 01-26-2020 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2964472)
Agree 100%. The Union is not only spending a significant amount of negotiating capital trying to implement a retirement vehicle the majority of pilots don't want, they are using misleading communications to promote it the the pilots. They've been doing this since the initial R&I Roadshow. Even a couple posters here have used similar talking points and as most can see any pilot with basic knowledge of finance and investing can see right thru it.

IMO the MBCBP is not a viable solution for the majority of Delta pilots and should be dropped from our ask immediately.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk


Prove it. Where have you read/seen that stated as fact? That is a complete assumption on your part.

Denny

tunes 01-26-2020 06:36 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2964489)
HSA can’t be used if someone is on the DPMP. So it’s not available to all.



Or tricare


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands