Pilots bad. Pilots greedy. Union bad.
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Yes, that video was more of a dry run for today’s video conference. They did mention a number and that they’ve been told some CP’s have told pilots it’s a CDC thing and not your job to tell other coworkers you’re sick.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 272
i.e: divide and conquer.
#23
...Nevertheless the company should have offered the SILs for May. It was a huge mistake not to. Surely in all that Delta public relations world they could have spun it well enough (and truthfully enough) to placate the noncons. We don't have to be in their face (no need to yell "get a union!") but something as simple as "we made a deal with the pilots on extreme short notice, our fleet complexity and FAA requirements make a comparison between pilots and others groups impossible, we'll reassess in a month, blah blah" would have gone a long way. The fact the company didn't even try, and didn't get any metrics (and we are a data obsessed company, normally) is troubling.
The thing is, if they HAD done this, we would not be nearly as solidified as a pilot group. You make the perfect, logical argument FOR offering SILs for May, and maybe even June, and I'm fairly certain that the spin-doctors could have storied it so as to placate all working groups; they sort of did us a favor by solidifying our resolve and unity as a pilot group.
The thing about JL's 4/2 email; as I read the third paragraph regarding discussions with ALPA, what just p!$$ed me off was his assertion that 'everyone but the pilots' are doing their part. The simple fact of the April rebid in addition to the fact that we'll be min-contract ALV for the foreseeable future means that the pilots ARE reducing DL cost.
Rant over.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: I'm here, i'm there, i'm everywhere...
Posts: 1,508
Seems pretty sh!tty that management would tell a pilot not to tell crew members he/she has flown with that they tested positive. While not required by law...you'd think a "family" would tell each other.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 393
Absolutely, positively this^^^
The thing is, if they HAD done this, we would not be nearly as solidified as a pilot group. You make the perfect, logical argument FOR offering SILs for May, and maybe even June, and I'm fairly certain that the spin-doctors could have storied it so as to placate all working groups; they sort of did us a favor by solidifying our resolve and unity as a pilot group.
The thing about JL's 4/2 email; as I read the third paragraph regarding discussions with ALPA, what just p!$$ed me off was his assertion that 'everyone but the pilots' are doing their part. The simple fact of the April rebid in addition to the fact that we'll be min-contract ALV for the foreseeable future means that the pilots ARE reducing DL cost.
Rant over.
The thing is, if they HAD done this, we would not be nearly as solidified as a pilot group. You make the perfect, logical argument FOR offering SILs for May, and maybe even June, and I'm fairly certain that the spin-doctors could have storied it so as to placate all working groups; they sort of did us a favor by solidifying our resolve and unity as a pilot group.
The thing about JL's 4/2 email; as I read the third paragraph regarding discussions with ALPA, what just p!$$ed me off was his assertion that 'everyone but the pilots' are doing their part. The simple fact of the April rebid in addition to the fact that we'll be min-contract ALV for the foreseeable future means that the pilots ARE reducing DL cost.
Rant over.
All very broad and general, where are the numbers? I think theyd show that we are doing "our part".
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Resting
Posts: 376
Because lower ALVs mean less take home pay for pilots, who are still working, albeit less than normal, just like the workers now working 3-4 day weeks. They can relate and don't see a special "good deal" for pilots vs them.
The SILs are PLOAs that pay 2/3 of a months salary while owing zero obligation to the company....just like the company granted thousands of similar PLOAs to the noncons.... for zero pay.
Surely you see the difference?
Nevertheless the company should have offered the SILs for May. It was a huge mistake not to. Surely in all that Delta public relations world they could have spun it well enough (and truthfully enough) to placate the noncons. We don't have to be in their face (no need to yell "get a union!") but something as simple as "we made a deal with the pilots on extreme short notice, our fleet complexity and FAA requirements make a comparison between pilots and others groups impossible, we'll reassess in a month, blah blah" would have gone a long way. The fact the company didn't even try, and didn't get any metrics (and we are a data obsessed company, normally) is troubling.
The SILs are PLOAs that pay 2/3 of a months salary while owing zero obligation to the company....just like the company granted thousands of similar PLOAs to the noncons.... for zero pay.
Surely you see the difference?
Nevertheless the company should have offered the SILs for May. It was a huge mistake not to. Surely in all that Delta public relations world they could have spun it well enough (and truthfully enough) to placate the noncons. We don't have to be in their face (no need to yell "get a union!") but something as simple as "we made a deal with the pilots on extreme short notice, our fleet complexity and FAA requirements make a comparison between pilots and others groups impossible, we'll reassess in a month, blah blah" would have gone a long way. The fact the company didn't even try, and didn't get any metrics (and we are a data obsessed company, normally) is troubling.
But there are two items that the company has to accept.
1) Pilots can only recoup about 30% of their pay on unemployment. Most non-cons will take short leaves, recoup the majority of their pay, and then return with no obligation to have their hours cut. We do not have that option.
2) Unlike flight attendants, who were made whole a decade ago, we are still trying to undo the damage from 20 years ago, and in the face of 6 Billion dollar profits, were making very little progress. Our history of career setback, is much worse. There is every expectation that concessions we take now will take a decade to recoup.
#27
For some of us, it’s hard to admit that you are absolutely correct.
But there are two items that the company has to accept.
1) Pilots can only recoup about 30% of their pay on unemployment. Most non-cons will take short leaves, recoup the majority of their pay, and then return with no obligation to have their hours cut. We do not have that option.
2) Unlike flight attendants, who were made whole a decade ago, we are still trying to undo the damage from 20 years ago, and in the face of 6 Billion dollar profits, were making very little progress. Our history of career setback, is much worse. There is every expectation that concessions we take now will take a decade to recoup.
But there are two items that the company has to accept.
1) Pilots can only recoup about 30% of their pay on unemployment. Most non-cons will take short leaves, recoup the majority of their pay, and then return with no obligation to have their hours cut. We do not have that option.
2) Unlike flight attendants, who were made whole a decade ago, we are still trying to undo the damage from 20 years ago, and in the face of 6 Billion dollar profits, were making very little progress. Our history of career setback, is much worse. There is every expectation that concessions we take now will take a decade to recoup.
#28
Yeah way to make us dig in even more JL, this is regional-esque bush-league crap right here. While we are no better than our 27,000 co-workers that have taken VLOAs, we are more highly specialized, spent years getting to where we are, sacrificed much, went into debt to pay for training, etc. and yes, unionized. Different category of labor which he doesn't seem to comprehend.
We are also more likely the bread winners of the household and don't do this as a second job or just for the benefits. Our reps are hopefully conveying this message and they seem to be doing that. Hard no for any 'help' that doesn't make us whole on the other side of this.
We are also more likely the bread winners of the household and don't do this as a second job or just for the benefits. Our reps are hopefully conveying this message and they seem to be doing that. Hard no for any 'help' that doesn't make us whole on the other side of this.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
That's a great idea.
Uh, what are we trying to achieve with that again? Sorry I forgot. I'm retiring shortly but if you want me to help drive the company into insolvency quicker ..wont affect me. Count me on board....(sarcasm emoji here) (thumb up emojii here)(wheres my retirement emoji here)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post