![]() |
QOL
As I see it we're not going to get huge pay raises with the coronavirus going on. Recovery is supposedly going to be at least 2 years. Why can't we focus on closing a contract with the quality of life improvements (that management said they could not give when we were over staffed) now with pay tied to inflation via the Consumer Price Index? We can double down on pay issues on the next iteration of the contract. Requires more pilots to fly the schedule so less furlowed, management wins when we postpone our huge asks for bk recovery, and we all win by trashing the optimiser. Kill this alv/tlv reduction mess now and move forward on negotiations. Wistful thinking may be, but sure would be nice.
|
Getting paid to not work. Gonna be tuff to improve on that level of QOL. 😆
|
Get more profit sharing, worked last time.
|
Originally Posted by BobZ
(Post 3088254)
Getting paid to not work. Gonna be tuff to improve on that level of QOL. 😆
I'll find out soon enough I suppose :) |
The best we're gonna do right now is nothing. If we are lucky, we aren't looking at another lost decade. Hopefully, opportunities will present themselves when we are past this Covid threat. When the company needs something, then we can talk. If I had another gig lined up, I'd be out of here. I can't see the next 5 years being any good in this industry.
|
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 3088284)
The best we're gonna do right now is nothing. If we are lucky, we aren't looking at another lost decade. Hopefully, opportunities will present themselves when we are past this Covid threat. When the company needs something, then we can talk. If I had another gig lined up, I'd be out of here. I can't see the next 5 years being any good in this industry.
I have been wrong before but I doubt we are looking at another lost decade for multiple reasons such as: **Back then all the legacies were extremely inefficient with LOT bidding, trips touching etc. Switching from that to PBS really hurt but this time we were running a lean operation. ** Most of the legacies parked hundreds of FE planes resulting in hundreds of FEs switching to FO. ** Age 65 with the pension loss basically eliminated most retirements for 5 years. ** Major mergers with huge efficiencies reducing plenty of flying. IMHO those were very large contributors to the lost decade none of which we are looking at now. Throw in some early outs and hopefully this episode will be short lived. Then again Covid appears to be the blackest of black swans so who is to say the asteroids wont hit next year. :eek: Scoop |
Originally Posted by theUpsideDown
(Post 3088262)
Im not gonna lie, this has been really awesome. Hate losing my job because of it, but jeesh what a deal. Is this what unemployment is like? Not get paid to do anything?
I'll find out soon enough I suppose :) |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 3088301)
I have been wrong before but I doubt we are looking at another lost decade for multiple reasons such as:
**Back then all the legacies were extremely inefficient with LOT bidding, trips touching etc. Switching from that to PBS really hurt but this time we were running a lean operation. ** Most of the legacies parked hundreds of FE planes resulting in hundreds of FEs switching to FO. ** Age 65 with the pension loss basically eliminated most retirements for 5 years. ** Major mergers with huge efficiencies reducing plenty of flying. IMHO those were very large contributors to the lost decade none of which we are looking at now. Throw in some early outs and hopefully this episode will be short lived. Then again Covid appears to be the blackest of black swans so who is to say the asteroids wont hit next year. :eek: Scoop The biggest hit to the lost decade was the retirement age change and the consolidation that occurred. Combined, they reduced the need for pilots drastically. I have no problem giving guys who lost their pensions an extra 5 years to make it up, don’t get me wrong, but combined with the mergers that occurred, contributed to a lack of need for pilots. I don’t see this as being even a 5 year event. By next summer, I think things will be back to normal. By 2022, we will be making big profits again. I read somewhere that we will achieve herd immunity in November, but even if we don’t, or if that doesn’t make people more comfortable, we will certainly have a vaccine by next spring. By next summer, in my humble, unscientific opinion, we will be cash flow positive again. When I got furloughed after 9/11, there was no talk about lowering ALV’s to save our jobs. And Management isn’t any different, at heart today. The only reason they may be willing to entertain a lowering of ALV’s this time versus 20 years ago.....is because they believe this will be short lived, as well. They don’t want to be scrambling to catch up 6-8 months from now. Just my opinion, and depending on what the terms are, I will vote for what’s best for all of us, not just me. If they really do approach us for an ALV reduction, with iron clad language that no furloughs will occur, or else we snap back to normal levels, that will actually be good news, as they’re trying to keep everyone available for the recovery. Again, this is just my opinion, and I am worried about the state of our industry, but I do believe things will come back quickly. |
Originally Posted by gargonp
(Post 3088251)
As I see it we're not going to get huge pay raises with the coronavirus going on. Recovery is supposedly going to be at least 2 years. Why can't we focus on closing a contract with the quality of life improvements (that management said they could not give when we were over staffed) now with pay tied to inflation via the Consumer Price Index? We can double down on pay issues on the next iteration of the contract. Requires more pilots to fly the schedule so less furlowed, management wins when we postpone our huge asks for bk recovery, and we all win by trashing the optimiser. Kill this alv/tlv reduction mess now and move forward on negotiations. Wistful thinking may be, but sure would be nice.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 3088301)
I have been wrong before but I doubt we are looking at another lost decade for multiple reasons such as:
**Back then all the legacies were extremely inefficient with LOT bidding, trips touching etc. Switching from that to PBS really hurt but this time we were running a lean operation. ** Most of the legacies parked hundreds of FE planes resulting in hundreds of FEs switching to FO. ** Age 65 with the pension loss basically eliminated most retirements for 5 years. ** Major mergers with huge efficiencies reducing plenty of flying. IMHO those were very large contributors to the lost decade none of which we are looking at now. Throw in some early outs and hopefully this episode will be short lived. Then again Covid appears to be the blackest of black swans so who is to say the asteroids wont hit next year. :eek: Scoop |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3088477)
The last thing Delta is doing on the pilot side is running a lean operation. The stats are available online and we are at the bottom in pilot productivity.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3088477)
The last thing Delta is doing on the pilot side is running a lean operation. The stats are available online and we are at the bottom in pilot productivity.
Scoop was comparing days of old (lost decade) with more recent operations. A comparison to our peers' productivity is not really germane, but is that what you were alluding to? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3088477)
The last thing Delta is doing on the pilot side is running a lean operation. The stats are available online and we are at the bottom in pilot productivity.
RG has said he could run us at 1000 less pilots. They did last summer. So much so the then VP of OPs sent a nice little "so sorry" email admitting they had run it hot. OMG, we are undermanned now, better start hiring again - boom, china flu They got lucky. Manning won;t be an issue for them going forward next 24-36 months. Optimizer 4.0 becomes aware. |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 3088301)
I have been wrong before but I doubt we are looking at another lost decade for multiple reasons such as:
**Back then all the legacies were extremely inefficient with LOT bidding, trips touching etc. Switching from that to PBS really hurt but this time we were running a lean operation. ** Most of the legacies parked hundreds of FE planes resulting in hundreds of FEs switching to FO. ** Age 65 with the pension loss basically eliminated most retirements for 5 years. ** Major mergers with huge efficiencies reducing plenty of flying. IMHO those were very large contributors to the lost decade none of which we are looking at now. Throw in some early outs and hopefully this episode will be short lived. Then again Covid appears to be the blackest of black swans so who is to say the asteroids wont hit next year. :eek: Scoop
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 3088416)
I am glad I read the rest of the thread before responding to the OP, because you said exactly what I would have said, only you did it better. 9/11 did crush the Industry, but by the time I got furloughed in March of 2002, our planes were mostly full. The problem was our yield. Every time we tried to raise prices, others would follow,but if memory serves, NW wouldn’t raise prices and we would rescind the price hike within a couple days. Management would say every time we raise prices $10 one way and $20 round trip, we lost millions in advanced bookings within hours. I don’t know if it’s true or not, but we also had JetBlue growing like crazy with cheap labor and low overhead. That would have resolved itself with “capacity discipline” within a year or two.
The biggest hit to the lost decade was the retirement age change and the consolidation that occurred. Combined, they reduced the need for pilots drastically. I have no problem giving guys who lost their pensions an extra 5 years to make it up, don’t get me wrong, but combined with the mergers that occurred, contributed to a lack of need for pilots. I don’t see this as being even a 5 year event. By next summer, I think things will be back to normal. By 2022, we will be making big profits again. I read somewhere that we will achieve herd immunity in November, but even if we don’t, or if that doesn’t make people more comfortable, we will certainly have a vaccine by next spring. By next summer, in my humble, unscientific opinion, we will be cash flow positive again. When I got furloughed after 9/11, there was no talk about lowering ALV’s to save our jobs. And Management isn’t any different, at heart today. The only reason they may be willing to entertain a lowering of ALV’s this time versus 20 years ago.....is because they believe this will be short lived, as well. They don’t want to be scrambling to catch up 6-8 months from now. Just my opinion, and depending on what the terms are, I will vote for what’s best for all of us, not just me. If they really do approach us for an ALV reduction, with iron clad language that no furloughs will occur, or else we snap back to normal levels, that will actually be good news, as they’re trying to keep everyone available for the recovery. Again, this is just my opinion, and I am worried about the state of our industry, but I do believe things will come back quickly. Excellent, optimistic posts my friends. It’s hard to be positive but every crisis is different at its core. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3088477)
The last thing Delta is doing on the pilot side is running a lean operation. The stats are available online and we are at the bottom in pilot productivity.
Seriously? I was comparing the "Pre" COVID environment to the "Pre 9-11" situation and highlighting the differences. C'mon man, I may be no Charles Dickens but surely my post wasn't that poorly worded. Please go back and note that you are erroneously comparing "were" to "is" and are obviously suffering from some type of space time anomaly either that or you don't take "tense" seriously. :D Scoop |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3088477)
The last thing Delta is doing on the pilot side is running a lean operation. The stats are available online and we are at the bottom in pilot productivity.
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3088489)
I think that had more to do with having 10 fleets and a network planning dept that mixed up flying among fleets so much that endless deadheads ensued. Don’t know if that will change ( well except we are now at 8 fleets)
To whatever level we're "unproductive" it was by their design for revenue optimization and performance metrics. That's fine. But they don't get to use that against us. Ever. |
Originally Posted by notEnuf
(Post 3088588)
What???
Really, what is your point with this statement? |
Obviously having 9 fleet types and spending 15% of our time at work DHing is our fault.
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 3088933)
Obviously having 9 fleet types and spending 15% of our time at work DHing is our fault.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3088525)
I'm interested. Where are these online stats? I've gathered that just before Covid (particularly over the summer) we were about as lean as we've been. Is that wrong, when controlling for the inefficiency of fleet diversity that management said was critical to our business model?
Scoop was comparing days of old (lost decade) with more recent operations. A comparison to our peers' productivity is not really germane, but is that what you were alluding to? |
Originally Posted by gargonp
(Post 3088251)
As I see it we're not going to get huge pay raises with the coronavirus going on. Recovery is supposedly going to be at least 2 years. Why can't we focus on closing a contract with the quality of life improvements (that management said they could not give when we were over staffed) now with pay tied to inflation via the Consumer Price Index? We can double down on pay issues on the next iteration of the contract. Requires more pilots to fly the schedule so less furlowed, management wins when we postpone our huge asks for bk recovery, and we all win by trashing the optimiser. Kill this alv/tlv reduction mess now and move forward on negotiations. Wistful thinking may be, but sure would be nice.
If ALPA ever gives any concessions they should be attached to more vacation inho |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands