Search
Notices

Sept 15th Townhall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2020, 01:40 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by Funk View Post
I don’t find it all that surprising, but not because of pilot greed or intransigence towards their lower seniority brethren and sisters, but because of the history of Delta asking for concessions from the pilot group, then pocketing the savings and staging the group in the back before the ink is dry on the agreements. With the prior history, why would any pilot agree in principle to any concession that they fully expect the company to use as ongoing leverage to erode pay, work rules, vacation, and future participation in profitable times?

Furthermore, for those that weren’t here prior to the era of perpetual profitability, one only need to look at the shifting goalposts, messaging mendacity, and say versus do gap to get a pretty strong feel that the company’s pursuit of pilot concessions has far less to do with company survival and far more to do with resetting relative bargaining and leverage positions vis-à-vis the pilot group. It is abundantly clear that reneging on the SIL for April rebid deal, along with stubborn refusal to even attempt other truly voluntary cost savings measures, while simultaneously taking as many pilot hostages as possible, 2558 at first, then 1941, the company isn’t serious about actual voluntary cost savings. I would add that the most striking example of the company’s drive to punish pilots in spite of data clearly denying the “need” for such steps was the use of FM to stiff the most senior furloughed pilots from a month of furlough pay, saving the company less than two tenths of a percent of the money they then raised off the frequent flyer program.

No, this crisis of job losses isn’t on the shoulders of greedy pilots, it is at the feet of a managerial group that doesn’t respect or understand the pilot group and its keystone position in the short and long-term health of the brand in the eyes of our customers.
Thank you. Well stated post. Sums it up rather nicely.
Drum is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 01:46 PM
  #12  
Rodeo clown
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: Tractor seat
Posts: 703
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
Most of the 90% were put off by the company's original proposal of targeted ALV cuts. If it were originally proposed across the board, it may have gotten traction. The survey results are a reflection of two decades of lies, not our interest in flying lower ALVs. The way this crisis has been handled so far is bringing up bad memories from bankruptcy. The pilot group is angry at management for all of their past failings and will say "No" to anything they propose, even if it was free Chick-fil-a on any trip that touches ATL.

I like the idea of working less hours as long as it doesn't involve working for less $ per hour. There is a big difference between a rate cut and an ALV cut.
I concur on the idea of ALV (hours) cuts and not payrate cuts, and I also concur that a “targeted” ALV cut versus a system wide cut would be the most appropriate shared burden on the pilot group.

I also think the real ongoing crisis is the abject lack of integrity the company leadership has with the pilot group, and its stubborn or naive (or both) refusal to own its mistakes, take legitimate action to atone for its failures, and then engage with the group as partners rather than act like carnival hustlers trying to separate us from our wallets. The litany of steps the company has taken with and since the April rebid, whether intended to be a dishonest bait and switch or a case of naive flip-flopping within the ambiguities within the agreement, it doesn’t matter, the result is the same, the company appears to be an untrustworthy and dishonest actor. Until there is a real acknowledgement of those problems, it will be unable to rehabilitate its standing with the pilots.
Funk is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 01:49 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tailhookah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Widget Jet
Posts: 765
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
Most of the 90% were put off by the company's original proposal of targeted ALV cuts. If it were originally proposed across the board, it may have gotten traction. The survey results are a reflection of two decades of lies, not our interest in flying lower ALVs. The way this crisis has been handled so far is bringing up bad memories from bankruptcy. The pilot group is angry at management for all of their past failings and will say "No" to anything they propose, even if it was free Chick-fil-a on any trip that touches ATL.

I like the idea of working less hours as long as it doesn't involve working for less $ per hour. There is a big difference between a rate cut and an ALV cut.
And also a huge difference between an across the board ALV cut vs. a targeted ALV cut.
Tailhookah is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 01:50 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Did anyone catch the line that Delta is taking long term steps in fleet planning? They are "making fleet decisions for the next 2-10 years". The same business genius minds that construct the fleet plan are also taking long term steps in eroding our PWA. Don't be fooled into thinking anything we do today will not be used against us for the remainder of our careers.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 01:54 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah View Post
And also a huge difference between an across the board ALV cut vs. a targeted ALV cut.
Absolutely. There also different flavors of targeted cuts. The original Delta proposal was communicated as targeting WB categories for reduced ALV. The United AIP is targeted cuts based on seniority. Targeted can have different meanings.

#240
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 02:38 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green View Post
Why should furloughs be stopped by getting concessions from the entire pilot group? I was furloughed in the past and that was not an option for me or others. I don't want any pilots furloughed, but I am not willing to give up concessions to stop it. Almost my entire career at Delta has been concessions. B scale at Express, furloughs, contract gutted during bankruptcy, pension gone, and continual contract benefit erosion since I was hired.

And here we go a prime example of someone who thinks it happened to me so its only fair it happens to you.... in case you haven't figured it out furloughs arent a right of passage, we all have been f'd by the industry more times then we can count. But IT HAS TO STOP SOMEWHERE WITH ONE GENERATION OF PILOTS
XJ86 is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 02:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Originally Posted by bender View Post
I was surprised that 90% of the pilot group wasn't willing to make a small temporary adjustment to the ALV in exchange for no furloughs. I'm part of the 10% that would, and I am not a UNA pilot.
I'm part of the 90%... that might be willing to listen when the company makes good on their pledges to exhaust all voluntary means, and to be creative. So far, I've seen only the VEOP and zero creativity.
TED74 is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 02:43 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by XJ86 View Post
And here we go a prime example of someone who thinks it happened to me so its only fair it happens to you.... in case you haven't figured it out furloughs arent a right of passage, we all have been f'd by the industry more times then we can count. But IT HAS TO STOP SOMEWHERE WITH ONE GENERATION OF PILOTS
Talk about pulling the ladder up behind you.
Amike is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 03:01 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by Amike View Post
Talk about pulling the ladder up behind you.
WTH? It's literally exactly the opposite of what he said. He wants to leave the ladder down for future generations.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 04:00 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
Default

Was there any discussion about the AE. Specifically on the reinstatements. Headed to training in a few weeks and wondering if they are going to waste everyone’s time by training people twice.
Rooster435 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MiLtoMajor123
Alaska
214
04-19-2020 10:07 PM
PilotWombat
Delta
86
04-12-2020 01:58 PM
The Sentinel
United
267
03-28-2020 07:25 PM
molson247
Regional
123
07-07-2008 12:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices