Phins2right

Not anti vax. Real vaccines do what the are supposed to do. This "vaccine" not even in the same universe.

The corn I consume does not go into my DNA and explicitly tell it to produce a protein - that's what DNA does BTW at its basic level. mRNA is instructing your DNA to do something. The issue is how is your body going to react to the protein created long term. We have NO answer to that question at this time. You are going to be the study.

this one quoted for pure gold. I guess it is easier to call someone crazy and what you did above than to look at the issue from a broader perspective. I don't really care if you agree with me or not. Time will tell what happens to those who decided to poison there bodies for really no good reason.

More of the same. Resort to name calling and ad hominem means you've intellectually stalled.

I saved your job no doubt. You're welcome.

Scoop, I prefer the post-ammo phase and prefer to use the tomahawk to the cranium ala Michone Kitana style.

123494

Didn't they kill Hank Aaron with the vaccine?

#forgive-but-never-forget

Viper25

• mRNA from the vaccine never enters the nucleus of the cell and does not affect or interact with a person’s DNA.

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-1...ne-basics.html

Phins2right

That is correct. mRNA does not enter DNA. It instructs it to via a "message" from chemicals to produce a certain type of protein. That is why it is called "memory" RNA or mRNA. It never does enter the DNA.

not sure why you posted this other than you don't understand what mRNA really is.

Gone Flying

The “M” in mRNA stands for messenger

https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/messenger-rna

waldo135

Because you keep posting the the mRNA CHANGES our DNA. Every credible source I can find says that is not correct.

Phins2right

Do your credible sources tell you that the DNA is being instructed to produce a protein previously NOT naturally produced by DNA?

Yes technically speaking it does not enter the DNA. It merely instructs it to produce a certain protein, which it will do forever. Once DNA has been instructed it continues ad infinitum until instructed to do otherwise - thereby one can say it indeed has been altered as it is no longer producing the normal proteins required for life.

You are fighting me on semantics. Messenger/memory/auto correct. Whatever, I'm on a boat using my mobile phone without my reading glasses on - shoot me.

To the other guy, let me just say this - no animal trials were conducted on this experimental medicine. A mouse/monkey etc can turn a generation much faster than a human. That is why we do animal trials on drugs. To create multiple generations to see what the longer term affects are from the drug. In this case that wasn't done. You are the experiment now.

Your body your choice. Time will tell. I just don't want that crap mandated for me to take. You can voluntarily do it to yourself - just like smoking meth. I don't want it, not yet anyway.

galaxy flyer

A perfectly healthy male in wing died hours after getting that year’s flu vaccine. Does that make flu vaccine dangerous? No.

OOfff

From what source did you get this information?

Phins2right

Using VEARs data, the experimental drug has an lethality at a rate 80 times that of the flu vax when looked at using that data. I think since sept ~140 flu shots with 20 deaths related. 30 mil experimental shots with 500 related deaths. It has been difficult to get the data as VEARs has been very glitchy lately and some data is being removed and scrubbed form the database.

There's legal down stream concerns the vax manufacturers had that is why this is called - in their own literature and filings BTW - an experimental treatment. Again, their terms, not mine.

We might be having a different conversation 3-4 years from now. Let's see.

You have that junk in your system, I don't.