Prepare Yourselves... 2021 AEs
#1251
Rodeo clown
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: Tractor seat
Posts: 703
So what are the thoughts on the nature of the AE posted? The imbalances on the NB categories, some running 3:1 FO to CA, obviously aren't viable for operations. ATL717 looks the like the worst of the imbalances. While I do believe the company would love to have more pilots under a seat lock in order to limit some level of training for a time, that seems like actual chess master level planning, and manning projections and plans don't seem to look very far into the future, let alone scheming to lock pilots into seats.
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
1) Is the company really gunning for affected FOs to bid themselves into seat locks with the next bid?
2) Do the large FO vacancies portend CA openings in those categories to balance out?
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
1) Is the company really gunning for affected FOs to bid themselves into seat locks with the next bid?
2) Do the large FO vacancies portend CA openings in those categories to balance out?
A) Any idea on the number of displaced CAs that could exercise reinstatement, or can bid back to left seat because they don't have a seat lock from their MD?
B) Some of the FO openings seem incongruous with fleet size (717?), or previous drawdown (NYC73N), so what happens with these during a follow up bid? Gratuitous seatlock (717), go back to a larger category (NYC737), or?
3) How many of the affected pilots may end up bidding for their old seats, leading to SRQ?B) Some of the FO openings seem incongruous with fleet size (717?), or previous drawdown (NYC73N), so what happens with these during a follow up bid? Gratuitous seatlock (717), go back to a larger category (NYC737), or?
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
#1252
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
So what are the thoughts on the nature of the AE posted? The imbalances on the NB categories, some running 3:1 FO to CA, obviously aren't viable for operations. ATL717 looks the like the worst of the imbalances. While I do believe the company would love to have more pilots under a seat lock in order to limit some level of training for a time, that seems like actual chess master level planning, and manning projections and plans don't seem to look very far into the future, let alone scheming to lock pilots into seats.
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
1) Is the company really gunning for affected FOs to bid themselves into seat locks with the next bid?
2) Do the large FO vacancies portend CA openings in those categories to balance out?
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
1) Is the company really gunning for affected FOs to bid themselves into seat locks with the next bid?
2) Do the large FO vacancies portend CA openings in those categories to balance out?
A) Any idea on the number of displaced CAs that could exercise reinstatement, or can bid back to left seat because they don't have a seat lock from their MD?
B) Some of the FO openings seem incongruous with fleet size (717?), or previous drawdown (NYC73N), so what happens with these during a follow up bid? Gratuitous seatlock (717), go back to a larger category (NYC737), or?
3) How many of the affected pilots may end up bidding for their old seats, leading to SRQ?B) Some of the FO openings seem incongruous with fleet size (717?), or previous drawdown (NYC73N), so what happens with these during a follow up bid? Gratuitous seatlock (717), go back to a larger category (NYC737), or?
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
I don’t know about the training events breakdown.
Bold prediction: Too many seat locks = new hire WB pilots.
#1253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,412
So what are the thoughts on the nature of the AE posted? The imbalances on the NB categories, some running 3:1 FO to CA, obviously aren't viable for operations. ATL717 looks the like the worst of the imbalances. While I do believe the company would love to have more pilots under a seat lock in order to limit some level of training for a time, that seems like actual chess master level planning, and manning projections and plans don't seem to look very far into the future, let alone scheming to lock pilots into seats.
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
The thought comes to mind, however, with the hinted CA and WB FO bid soon to follow:
4) How many pilots hadn't finished OE and would therefore require a full course? (200-300?)
BONUS: Bold predictions?
I think this number is ~250 pilots.
#1254
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: E170 CA/LCA
Posts: 621
About 100 of us never finished indoc. Idk how that is going to work.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
#1255
#1256
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,201
And 2nd year pay. Also, massive movement that wasn’t accounted before. I think next bid will be crazy, maybe around 1500-1600 WB and CA positions. I think that bid will be bigger than the 2017 MOAB.
#1259
Welcome to Delta, it really is a great place with wonderful crews.
#1260
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,201
You’re not missing anything, really. Just go and read the FOM out the iPad.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post