2025
#101
Who has any of their 401k in cash though? Seems like the ones who would need or want to use a 401k are us younger ones who shouldn’t have any of our 401k in cash. I’m not disagreeing, I’m just genuinely curious. We recently bought a house and, without boring you with too many details, had to get creative on the down payment since we couldn’t put in a contingent offer. The 401k loan never even factored into our decision mainly because of not wanting to have any of our money out of the market.
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 891
Who has any of their 401k in cash though? Seems like the ones who would need or want to use a 401k are us younger ones who shouldn’t have any of our 401k in cash. I’m not disagreeing, I’m just genuinely curious. We recently bought a house and, without boring you with too many details, had to get creative on the down payment since we couldn’t put in a contingent offer. The 401k loan never even factored into our decision mainly because of not wanting to have any of our money out of the market.
Unless you are in your 20s you should have some in cash/bonds. Even in your thirties a small percentage doesn’t take a large total 401k to equate to 50k in cash.
But to what everyone else is saying, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take money out for a loan that is allocated to equities.
#103
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,547
Unless you are in your 20s you should have some in cash/bonds. Even in your thirties a small percentage doesn’t take a large total 401k to equate to 50k in cash.
But to what everyone else is saying, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take money out for a loan that is allocated to equities.
But to what everyone else is saying, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take money out for a loan that is allocated to equities.
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Unless you are in your 20s you should have some in cash/bonds. Even in your thirties a small percentage doesn’t take a large total 401k to equate to 50k in cash.
But to what everyone else is saying, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take money out for a loan that is allocated to equities.
But to what everyone else is saying, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take money out for a loan that is allocated to equities.
#106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 391
I don’t think this is the poster’s intent, but I started racking up some cash in my IRA back in 2019 when we could kinda feel some kind of recessionary pressure coming after such a long run up. I was basically waiting for either an actual recession or a major correction to commit it. Never saw Covid coming, but having that reserve to commit near the bottom made me look like a genius. Thinking about doing it again. I think the boomer greed machine can eek out another major crash before they hand the reins over.(that last sentence is only there because this is APC (and also it’s what I actually think)).
#107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 891
Can you explain why I should have cash in it? I get having a rainy day fund, but I have that elsewhere where there isn’t a penalty if accessed. I also can understand it if you are close to retirement in case of a down market you have cash to use while the other shares recover. I’m sure there’s a reason, I just can’t come up with it.
To you and tennis guru, if you want to combine your emergency fund with the cash portion of your portfolio, fine. I won’t argue with that one bit. But whatever you consider to be under the umbrella of your retirement funds should have a portion of cash that increases as you age. How much is up to your individual risks/needs. If you are really in your 30s/40s with no cash retirement, you are setting yourself up for disaster in a down market.
#108
To you and tennis guru, if you want to combine your emergency fund with the cash portion of your portfolio, fine. I won’t argue with that one bit. But whatever you consider to be under the umbrella of your retirement funds should have a portion of cash that increases as you age. How much is up to your individual risks/needs. If you are really in your 30s/40s with no cash retirement, you are setting yourself up for disaster in a down market.
#109
Roll’n Thunder
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,547
To you and tennis guru, if you want to combine your emergency fund with the cash portion of your portfolio, fine. I won’t argue with that one bit. But whatever you consider to be under the umbrella of your retirement funds should have a portion of cash that increases as you age. How much is up to your individual risks/needs. If you are really in your 30s/40s with no cash retirement, you are setting yourself up for disaster in a down market.
And again, I have a strong non-retirement cash position now and will certainly increase that many times by the time I retire. You can only put so much money into a tax-advantaged retirement vehicle, while there is no limit to how much cash you can save outside retirement. Why not put as much of those limited retirement dollars to work growing year after year instead of missing out on growth with dead cash when I can keep all the dead cash I want outside my 401k?
#110
But that cuts both ways. Yes, a cash position will buffer against a loss in value during a downturn, but it also holds back an increase in value during a bull market. I had no cash on my 401k going into 2020, and now my portfolio is up even higher than it started last year. All a cash position would have done is reduce my losses while at the same time leaving less in my account today. As I get closer to retirement I will dial back risk but with 30+ years to go I have no fear or panic going into any sort of downturn because I know I will come out ahead long term.
And again, I have a strong non-retirement cash position now and will certainly increase that many times by the time I retire. You can only put so much money into a tax-advantaged retirement vehicle, while there is no limit to how much cash you can save outside retirement. Why not put as much of those limited retirement dollars to work growing year after year instead of missing out on growth with dead cash when I can keep all the dead cash I want outside my 401k?
And again, I have a strong non-retirement cash position now and will certainly increase that many times by the time I retire. You can only put so much money into a tax-advantaged retirement vehicle, while there is no limit to how much cash you can save outside retirement. Why not put as much of those limited retirement dollars to work growing year after year instead of missing out on growth with dead cash when I can keep all the dead cash I want outside my 401k?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post