Notices

Covid shot and NFLY

Old 04-18-2021, 08:35 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brakechatter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green View Post
Can you travel as a nonrev on your NFLY days?
If you drop a trip as a result of your NFLY status, yes, you may travel unrestricted. If you utilize sick time to get the vaccine, you may travel to and from the vaccination site on the airline -- but not unrestricted.

Either way, you need to notify the CPO so that you don't get flagged.
brakechatter is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 09:01 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
Ok, I'm glad you saw value in that deal. Would you do it again? How much money did you lose in April? Was that a fair trade? If you take the time to examine it and its a wash, fine. But, it was not a good deal and the bait and switch was called out as a huge language fail. That's on us. (ALPA)

BTW are you a resident of a non-family sick leave state or in the guard/reserve? Those are the only value I saw and neither applied to me. How many pilots did this really benefit is still a valid question.
I did see value. I knew I would have sick time remaining after myself or a family member had Covid and I would be paid during the time missed. Actual language to deal with fatigue and extension calls are a long term gain. I’m not a military person, but I’m not a commuter and I can still see the value to commuting gains. Why can’t I recognize the value gained by others in the group? I also don’t live in a state with non-family sick leave, but more power to those who do.

A few hours of pay difference in April are not greater than the long term gains. You obviously disagree, your April hour loss out-values the gains in the agreement to you. That or you are placing the complete value on the SIL language. The language was a fail, but it doesn’t negate the other gains.

I guess we disagree, you don’t see value and that’s fine. I do though.
Iceberg is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 11:10 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,249
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Delta’s training load stems from two things. A very generous and over subscribed early out program. The take rate caught the company by surprise. The second thing was the complete elimination of the 777 and MD88/90 categories along with a restructuring of the 7ER category.
You forgot the main reason....MOAD before VOEP.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that offering the VEOP first, seeing what positions left, and then offering the MOAD to further reduce categories as needed was the way it SHOULD have gone.
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 11:15 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,258
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
You forgot the main reason....MOAD before VOEP.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that offering the VEOP first, seeing what positions left, and then offering the MOAD to further reduce categories as needed was the way it SHOULD have gone.
I agree with you. They should have offered the VEOP first. They were however able to cancel a big chunk of the MOAD training. Their crystal ball however saw this as longer term than it looks like it’s going to turn out. Regardless just the fleet restructuring would have been a mammoth undertaking in normal times and is the reason aircraft phase puts are normally stretched over years not months.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 11:31 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
You forgot the main reason....MOAD before VOEP.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that offering the VEOP first, seeing what positions left, and then offering the MOAD to further reduce categories as needed was the way it SHOULD have gone.
I don’t think this was the main reason, I think the main reason was after they reduced their headcount by 1806, they continued to push furloughs as hard as they could. Realistically had they run a large AE bringing back most if not all UNA pilots in September 2020 instead of 600 we would be in a much better position right now, have most pilots trained and qualified on an aircraft, And probably be hiring next month.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 11:32 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,022
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I agree with you. They should have offered the VEOP first. They were however able to cancel a big chunk of the MOAD training. Their crystal ball however saw this as longer term than it looks like it’s going to turn out. Regardless just the fleet restructuring would have been a mammoth undertaking in normal times and is the reason aircraft phase puts are normally stretched over years not months.
Where did you read the company was surprised by the VEOP take rate?
notEnuf is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 12:43 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,070
Default

I heard it from multiple CPs.

Doesn't mean it's true, but that was certainly my understanding at the time
Sputnik is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 12:55 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,022
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
I heard it from multiple CPs.

Doesn't mean it's true, but that was certainly my understanding at the time
What kind of numbers were they expecting or projecting to leave for training and cost savings purposes?
notEnuf is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 02:02 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 498
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
You forgot the main reason....MOAD before VOEP.

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that offering the VEOP first, seeing what positions left, and then offering the MOAD to further reduce categories as needed was the way it SHOULD have gone.
the MOAD first got a lot more people to VEOP.
All those dudes that got displaced got to VEOP at their old pay rate ...
Hossharris is offline  
Old 04-18-2021, 02:47 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 320B
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
What kind of numbers were they expecting or projecting to leave for training and cost savings purposes?
No idea about MGMT but my read on line wisdom at the time was that 800 would be a healthy number.
Bert Sampson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices