Search
Notices

Council 44 Recall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2021, 05:49 AM
  #1  
Has a furrowed brow
Thread Starter
 
Wolf424's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,160
Default Council 44 Recall

This probably won’t go well, but I’m hoping maybe someone could talk objectively on this.

I’ve been out of the loop for the last year, and I’m not read into ALPA politics...but can someone *objectively* explain the reasoning behind the recall vote?

All I’ve been able to gather on social media is that some are upset that poll results weren’t released? And there seems to be some head-butting between those who supported RS vs JA for MEC Chairman.
Wolf424 is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 06:04 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,039
Default

Originally Posted by Wolf424 View Post
This probably won’t go well, but I’m hoping maybe someone could talk objectively on this.

I’ve been out of the loop for the last year, and I’m not read into ALPA politics...but can someone *objectively* explain the reasoning behind the recall vote?

All I’ve been able to gather on social media is that some are upset that poll results weren’t released? And there seems to be some head-butting between those who supported RS vs JA for MEC Chairman.
I think the poll results thing is more of a salt to the wound. Here is what I gather. Generally, there is a lot of anger over what appears to be favoritism toward junior pilots vs senior pilots. The reps in ATL are fairly junior and many senior pilots feel that they are not addressing their retirement wants dating all the way back to the opener. There is a feeling from many that they are too quick to defend management versus taking the more hardline stance of some of the other councils. I think the movement started last year when they voted to rerun the bids following the Covid stuff and voted to allow 55 hour SILs without a requirement to use them. This was after supporting the Scheduling Chair who was fired for agreeing to low SIL values without consulting the MEC and opposing his removal and opposing the drawdown of VB and SIL LOAs (note: this may not have been all the same LEC reps but it contributes to the animous). Then when they kept delaying having a meeting even when other councils were having them, it started to gain momentum amongst other groups.

Other contributing factors are voting to approve the perceived management-friendly LOAs, voting out the previous MEC for a perceived management-friendly guy, voting against supporting FA unionization, and various other votes where they were either in the minority of LECs or perceived to be voting in the minority of social media popular opinion.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 05-05-2021, 06:57 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 837
Default

Originally Posted by Wolf424 View Post
This probably won’t go well, but I’m hoping maybe someone could talk objectively on this.

I’ve been out of the loop for the last year, and I’m not read into ALPA politics...but can someone *objectively* explain the reasoning behind the recall vote?

All I’ve been able to gather on social media is that some are upset that poll results weren’t released? And there seems to be some head-butting between those who supported RS vs JA for MEC Chairman.
lol.....it won't go well .....
MJP27 is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 07:22 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,091
Default

Yeah, this thread will be fun.
jaxsurf is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 07:29 AM
  #5  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,540
Default

What are the odds the recall effort succeeds?
tennisguru is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 07:47 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,039
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru View Post
What are the odds the recall effort succeeds?
I would say the vote will pass at the meeting..
CBreezy is online now  
Old 05-05-2021, 08:12 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 199
Default

It will definitely pass. I think a lot of people are annoyed with the lack of meetings and their reasoning. The person leading the charge (BB) has no clout but the fact they kept delaying meetings as said above, caused a ton of momentum for this.
AlphaBeta is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 09:27 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,396
Default

Originally Posted by AlphaBeta View Post
It will definitely pass. I think a lot of people are annoyed with the lack of meetings and their reasoning. The person leading the charge (BB) has no clout but the fact they kept delaying meetings as said above, caused a ton of momentum for this.
It may pass, but I hope a lot of the junior guys are aware that BB, the chief architect and whiner, is actually angry that the junior guys did NOT get furloughed, and in fact is holding up a lack of furlough as a serious benefit that junior guys got at the "expense" of senior guys (and I am one of the modestly senior guys these days, and cannot fathom that kind of thinking).

I do agree that the lack of meetings is a real problem. But don't think for one second that this is about the "greater good" for C44. This is about a small cadre of already super-senior guys embracing the "got mine, want yours" mindset. If we vote out the current reps, the world will not come to an end, and we will move on with new reps, like we have for many years. But I don't think that anything better will result. Nor do I think that keeping them in office will herald great things either.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 11:05 AM
  #9  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,540
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
It may pass, but I hope a lot of the junior guys are aware that BB, the chief architect and whiner, is actually angry that the junior guys did NOT get furloughed, and in fact is holding up a lack of furlough as a serious benefit that junior guys got at the "expense" of senior guys (and I am one of the modestly senior guys these days, and cannot fathom that kind of thinking).

I do agree that the lack of meetings is a real problem. But don't think for one second that this is about the "greater good" for C44. This is about a small cadre of already super-senior guys embracing the "got mine, want yours" mindset. If we vote out the current reps, the world will not come to an end, and we will move on with new reps, like we have for many years. But I don't think that anything better will result. Nor do I think that keeping them in office will herald great things either.
Their term is almost up anyways - I think there will be a normal election in the fall either way.
tennisguru is offline  
Old 05-05-2021, 11:40 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
It may pass, but I hope a lot of the junior guys are aware that BB, the chief architect and whiner, is actually angry that the junior guys did NOT get furloughed, and in fact is holding up a lack of furlough as a serious benefit that junior guys got at the "expense" of senior guys (and I am one of the modestly senior guys these days, and cannot fathom that kind of thinking).

I do agree that the lack of meetings is a real problem. But don't think for one second that this is about the "greater good" for C44. This is about a small cadre of already super-senior guys embracing the "got mine, want yours" mindset. If we vote out the current reps, the world will not come to an end, and we will move on with new reps, like we have for many years. But I don't think that anything better will result. Nor do I think that keeping them in office will herald great things either.
I agree, none of the “recall committee “ has anyone’s best interest in mind besides their own. This whole thing is just dividing us up more. And the fact “bb” has never apologized for his letter during bankruptcy is ridiculous.
AlphaBeta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rube
Delta
21
08-06-2016 07:41 PM
rsor
Major
338
11-13-2013 07:58 PM
Sink r8
Major
70
11-12-2013 04:58 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
46
04-24-2008 06:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices