Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
DL Hiring: New Process >

DL Hiring: New Process

Search
Notices

DL Hiring: New Process

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2023, 11:05 AM
  #3671  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
I love that your response to “This guy literally said that because he's a 20 year military veteran, he doesn't think he should have to take the same tests everyone has to” was to disagree that the mil person said that, then agree that they should be exempt from the testing.
"Siri, define gaslighting".
Tropical is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:39 PM
  #3672  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by datuputi3 View Post
Thanks man. Been practicing exactly that. Was the AAL one similar to Delta's? Congrats on the CJO!
Yes, the AAL one is very similar. Delta has an audio/readback portion that it unique. The AAL personality test is more like a standard Hogan test, Delta's is slightly different. The dot counting, tunnel flying, and sudoku tests were the same.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:42 PM
  #3673  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Puddytatt View Post
Maybe a little humility wouldn't hurt to start...
Humility is a fine trait that I'm always working on for sure.

But also, I've got a 100% clean, spotless 20 year military record across 6 different aircraft that required military and civilian training to complete. That should be worth something.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:43 PM
  #3674  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical View Post
Uh... you serious, Clark? Is this trolling?



Hold on just a second. This guy literally said that because he's a 20 year military veteran, he doesn't think he should have to take the same tests everyone has to. I guess Delta should just salute him and put him in class? And you're defending this?

This is the ultimate stereotype of military officer douchebaggery when they try to flex on the civilian world. We really have enough of that at this airline already.

Thank you for your service. Now get in line with everyone else, Colonel.
I don't feel like you're getting what I'm saying. If you're a 20 year regional guy with a 100% clean history across multiple aircraft and no failures in any training, that would be worth the same I would think.

The Delta AON test is probably interesting for the data nerds.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:48 PM
  #3675  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Tropical View Post
Yes, it was a straw man argument. One you continue to attempt to argue. If you must go there, the Endeavor pilots flowing actually do work for our parent company and have a long record flying our passengers with success. USAF dude does not. So it's an irrelevant comparison (straw man argument).

He was totally a d-bag. He straight up stated that he shouldn't have to go through the normal interview process because his long military record "speaks for itself". Sorry, not sorry, but yeah, that reflects poorly on all military officers by perpetuating the "better than you" top gun stereotype.

Now you're judging me and my cockpit culture based on some semi-anonymous message board posts? Wow, you're really on a roll. Step away from the computer, Captain. Go get some fresh air. This isn't real life.
I've gone through the normal interview process with 3 other major airlines now and have CJOs will all but UPS (where I passed the interview and am waiting for training to start up again). I'm not asking to go to the front of the line. I'm asking Delta to not screen any pilots (including you, whatever your background is) using a 5x5 symbol sudoku and a nearly impossible dot counting exercise. Gather data and crunch it....fine. Not sure why this is controversial.

I have a background in a small but highly visible passenger carrying operation and have worked with people from all walks of life as flight attendants, flight engineers, and pilots (not to mention load masters and boom operators). Not sure why you're so angry, but this is the internet so I'll allow it.

Last edited by CAFB 04-12; 03-30-2023 at 04:04 PM.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:54 PM
  #3676  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by jaxsurf View Post
A resume that documents 20 years of military service doesn’t really mean crap. There always needs to be some sort of sh** screen so that the organization is able to keep the most obvious weirdos/douchebags out.
Not talking about a resume (as in a list of duty titles). I'm talking about 20 years of successful military and civilian training as well as 20+ check rides in 6 different aircraft.

100% agree about the in-person interview being a "weird dude" screen.

Delta can do what they want. They certainly need some sort of screen because they can't be expected to look at all 10,000 apps or whatever.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 03:58 PM
  #3677  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I didn't look at what he said like that.

In his defense, he made a lot of sense. He didn't say his military creds should entitle him to the class of his choice. Just that 20 years flying in the mil should suffice for the silly balance the ball on the see-saw while counting backwards tests.

The one thing about mil pilots that I think everyone can agree on is that as a group they bring at least a guaranteed average acceptable (or better) standard that is widely recognized by pretty much everyone in the industry. The fact that someone could successfully navigate a 20 year military flying career but not get a job offer because of some high theory "cog test" implied derivatives is kind of silly when you think about it.

He also didn't say he shouldn't have to interview.
Thank you for understanding what I was trying to say.

I've done everything else the rest of you have done to prep for the day to include paying thousands of $$$ for consultants and prep. Though I wish I had paid for Cut-e practice before the Delta AON test. Didn't realize it was a "thanks but don't call us we'll call you" kind of thing with them. Lesson learned. Feedback I've received from friends at Delta is usually along the lines of "Delta misses out on a lot of good pilots with that test." Maybe they're just being nice to my face.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 04:58 PM
  #3678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Big ones
Posts: 708
Default

Congrats, CAFB, on getting several other flying job offers. The transition from mil to airlines can be stressful and yours sounded a little moreso than normal. I’m sorry about the past PARB results but am glad for you that other options opened up. FWIW I think you should reapply to dal in a few months if u still want to try to get on here.
tripled is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 07:23 PM
  #3679  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by tripled View Post
Congrats, CAFB, on getting several other flying job offers. The transition from mil to airlines can be stressful and yours sounded a little moreso than normal. I’m sorry about the past PARB results but am glad for you that other options opened up. FWIW I think you should reapply to dal in a few months if u still want to try to get on here.
Thanks. I update my app daily
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 03-30-2023, 08:14 PM
  #3680  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 58
Default

Originally Posted by CAFB 04-12 View Post
I'm not asking to go to the front of the line. I'm asking Delta to not screen any pilots (including you, whatever your background is) using a 5x5 symbol sudoku and a nearly impossible dot counting exercise. Gather data and crunch it....fine. Not sure why this is controversial.
While I see where you're coming from and would be equally frustrated, I'm also retired AF and to play the devil's advocate I'm actually a little surprised you're speaking up about this. How many unwinnable hazes or nonsensical exercises have we gone through throughout our career? Basic training assault course, UPT standup, years of CBTs, red dot/SARC/etc., SERE, UCIs, PRFs, ...competing against the holiday party planner for strats. The list goes on, you learn to roll your eyes, play the game, and deal with it.

At least with the AON, I can see why it's vaguely relevant, if not antiquated for a time when they had way too many qualified candidates to filter out. But after reading this thread for awhile and seeing people had failed it even in today's hiring market, I tabbed all the advice, put some prep work in, and passed just fine. Maybe that little bit of extra focused effort (which you're already on top of) is what puts some scores slightly ahead, impossible dot counting aside.
immolated is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeeWizDriver
NetJets
1409
06-29-2023 05:25 PM
EUhoppa
Career Questions
10
07-22-2013 11:13 AM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
PistolP
Regional
12
11-22-2006 08:20 PM
Pylot
Hangar Talk
8
09-04-2006 05:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices