![]() |
Originally Posted by Big E 757
(Post 3349283)
100% Retro.
|
Food for Thought
Our last annual pay raise was Jan of 2019. A 10% increase in pay rates gets us to ZERO gain in purchasing power over the last three years.
|
Originally Posted by Wolf424
(Post 3349267)
I bet we see something by July (assuming the mediation board doesn’t go back into hibernation)
Now, will that “by July” TA be worth implementing? I’m skeptical…but the prospect of a 3-4 year old contact is unacceptable. Giving the company a pass on what will be essentially an entire contract cycle isn’t an option. That’s how precedents are started. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3349323)
Somebody gets the importance of timely contracts.
|
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3349329)
yawn, on time substandard contracts are not worth it. Its the reason our current contract is lacking is do many areas. The "we'll get it next time" attatude has to stop.
|
Originally Posted by Der Meister
(Post 3349329)
yawn, on time substandard contracts are not worth it. Its the reason our current contract is lacking is do many areas. The "we'll get it next time" attatude has to stop.
Didn't US Airways aim for the moon and spend like 8-10 years waiting for a contract (and being stuck at very low wages - if I remember, a topped out 320 Captain there made as much as a ER FO here) then eventually get a mediocre contract that was basically 3% per year anyway. |
Maybe if we weren’t always going first, we could pattern off the others.
|
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 3349337)
No way - I'd take a contract with a 3-5% increase per year over waiting 5 years for a 15% raise. TVM first (which is a real thing) and it keeps the negotiation cycle moving along. We get other improvements in a new contract other than pay too.
|
I enjoy how a few of you live in this alternate reality that believes we would have gotten a contract in 2020 if we just asked for less. The reality is if our current contract wasn't as substandard as it is we wouldn't have had to ask for much
But it is substandard in many areas that need improving on this cycle, it's not about the $ or pay rates it's about every other portion of the contract that has been neglected. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 3349337)
No way - I'd take a contract with a 3-5% increase per year over waiting 5 years for a 15% raise. TVM first (which is a real thing) and it keeps the negotiation cycle moving along. We get other improvements in a new contract other than pay too.
Didn't US Airways aim for the moon and spend like 8-10 years waiting for a contract (and being stuck at very low wages - if I remember, a topped out 320 Captain there made as much as a ER FO here) then eventually get a mediocre contract that was basically 3% per year anyway. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands