Search

Notices

4% Pay raise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2022 | 03:21 PM
  #71  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I agree with you. It just ****es me off that I pay DALPA over $600 per month to watch the non-union employees do better than us. I've said it before. We're better off with ALPA than without, the non-union are better off having us unionized than not, but the non-unionized are better off than us.
I’m sorry that you can’t see the obvious benefits to a union. Where we’d be without ALPA. You’d be paid far less, including benefits, not to mention you’d maybe not even be hired here…. Based on your seniority due to SCOPE, job protections…. Sure it could be better. But we do have protection…. A lot more than you apparently realize. Go back a few years honcho when we were receiving record profit sharing, on top of industry leading compensation. Yup…. The Big D would’ve let us have that…. You know, to keep the union out.

Last edited by Tailhookah; 03-17-2022 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 03:31 PM
  #72  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14
What percentage of daily departures have a 4 man crew? How senior are those pilots? How long will it take the average pilot to take advantage of this gain?
IDK or care. But it seems to have affected a 11/30/21 new hire that is holding 73A in NY now. More A positions at the top mean more A positions open at the bottom. Do you not understand that? At least we have it. Just accept that there are things we have in our contract that are good. Who gives a purple dump on who it helps. It creates more Captains at every level Sherlock. That’s good. United doesn’t. My buds there wish they had that. And yes, it helps the very senior…. Where many will end up some day. Oh and it helped the very junior as well.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 03:49 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I agree with you. It just ****es me off that I pay DALPA over $600 per month to watch the non-union employees do better than us. I've said it before. We're better off with ALPA than without, the non-union are better off having us unionized than not, but the non-unionized are better off than us.
On what data do you base this statement on? Delta enjoys significant cost advantages with our non pilot employees over our competitors. Hourly wages tend to match other airlines but work rules and retirement lag by big margins. This does not even factor in the fact that Delta is able to outsource many of those jobs to DSS and others where the pay is also lower.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:08 PM
  #74  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14
What percentage of daily departures have a 4 man crew? How senior are those pilots? How long will it take the average pilot to take advantage of this gain?
I think the point of the post you responded to is that DAL uses more captains on a smaller number of widebodies with ULH flying than do either UAL or AAL. We have a ton of 350s coming as well as 330s, so that delay in getting to that ULH widebody will get shorter as time goes on. DTW 350 has quite a few 8000 seniority FOs. CA is down to 2800 or so. I can guarantee you that the plugs will get some of that ULH flying because 70 hour layover ICN trips are not the greatest. SEA 330 FOs go down to 9000. There is some 4 man there as well I believe.

But what you have to realize is that both those numbers would be more senior if we had the same staffing as UAL/AAL with 1 CA and 3 FOs.

I have a little over 3 years to go and I am jealous as Hell of what you younger guys are gonna have available in the coming years.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:25 PM
  #75  
ebl14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 933
Likes: 80
From: 73N
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
IDK or care. But it seems to have affected a 11/30/21 new hire that is holding 73A in NY now. More A positions at the top mean more A positions open at the bottom. Do you not understand that? At least we have it. Just accept that there are things we have in our contract that are good. Who gives a purple dump on who it helps. It creates more Captains at every level Sherlock. That’s good. United doesn’t. My buds there wish they had that. And yes, it helps the very senior…. Where many will end up some day. Oh and it helped the very junior as well.
If you consider UA had NB captain bids go UNFILLLED, due to their policy of a “pilot needs to be off probation to upgrade” I think all things are equal. Try again.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:37 PM
  #76  
ebl14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 933
Likes: 80
From: 73N
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
I think the point of the post you responded to is that DAL uses more captains on a smaller number of widebodies with ULH flying than do either UAL or AAL. We have a ton of 350s coming as well as 330s, so that delay in getting to that ULH widebody will get shorter as time goes on. DTW 350 has quite a few 8000 seniority FOs. CA is down to 2800 or so. I can guarantee you that the plugs will get some of that ULH flying because 70 hour layover ICN trips are not the greatest. SEA 330 FOs go down to 9000. There is some 4 man there as well I believe.

But what you have to realize is that both those numbers would be more senior if we had the same staffing as UAL/AAL with 1 CA and 3 FOs.

I have a little over 3 years to go and I am jealous as Hell of what you younger guys are gonna have available in the coming years.
Good for you. I’m already locked in here with more that a few years under my belt so no point in the “why don’t you just leave argument”. I will say that the career progression and earnings outlook looks better for a new hire going to UAL or AAL, especially considering that they will fly more years on larger equipment. UA has people upgrading right off probation (a requirement) and would have street captains (like us) otherwise. Our international ops peaked years ago and will continue to shrink. The best we can do now is be the best paid narrowbody pilots in the industry.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:43 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I agree with you. It just ****es me off that I pay DALPA over $600 per month to watch the non-union employees do better than us. I've said it before. We're better off with ALPA than without, the non-union are better off having us unionized than not, but the non-unionized are better off than us.
Better off than us in what way? I'm sure you don't mean financially. That's not even debatable.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:50 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 130
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
I have a little over 3 years to go and I am jealous as Hell of what you younger guys are gonna have available in the coming years.
The grass is always greener. I’m quite sure some of your narrowbody captain coworkers are jealous as hell that you’ll spend your last ~5 years in one of our very limited top-rate Captain slots.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 04:52 PM
  #79  
DWC CAP10 USAF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 217
From: Looking left
Default

Regarding the 2 Capt vs 1 Capt long haul point, hypothetically, lets say DL has all their 350's and UAL has all their 777/787/400 airborne at the same time, and lets say every DL 350 is flying > 12 hours requiring double Capts and every United 777/787/400 was flying < 13 hours only requiring a single Capt.

Delta would have 34 Capts on those 17 aircraft making top pay rate

United would have 175 Capts on 175 aircraft making top pay.

34 vs 175....Not even close to being an "equilizer"

Even when we have the 44 x A-350's that we are currently forecast to have...that would still be 88 DL Capts to 175 UAL Capts, so about half.

Hell, put 4 Captain on those 44 A-350's and it would be 176 for Delta and 175 for United.

United's WB pilot cost per block hour is almost $1,000 more than Delta's.
Reply
Old 03-17-2022 | 05:03 PM
  #80  
Wolf424's Avatar
Has a furrowed brow
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 250
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14
AAL, especially considering that they will fly more years on larger equipment.
Why do people still think AA has more WBs than we do?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
gzsg
Major
132
12-07-2013 08:27 PM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices