Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Engage podcasts (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/137118-engage-podcasts.html)

3 green 03-24-2022 05:09 AM

Engage podcasts
 
If you haven't listened to the Engage podcasts on the DALPA website I highly recommend them. Scheduling issues and fatigue are discussed and explained on episodes E4-6. I believe you can access them thru the dashboard, but I went to the scheduling committee section then did a search for "Engage". Good info and well put together.

CBreezy 03-24-2022 05:53 AM


Originally Posted by 3 green (Post 3393976)
If you haven't listened to the Engage podcasts on the DALPA website I highly recommend them. Scheduling issues and fatigue are discussed and explained on episodes E4-6. I believe you can access them thru the dashboard, but I went to the scheduling committee section then did a search for "Engage". Good info and well put together.

You can listen to them anywhere you can get podcasts.

FangsF15 03-24-2022 06:20 AM

+1,000,000. The first one is geared to a new hire, but the 2nd & 3rd give a very good picture of negotiations. Plus the fatigue stuff mentioned my 3green.

They should be required listening for everyone on the SL.

Gunfighter 03-25-2022 07:10 AM

Good series so far. I appreciate ALPA's effort.

Eddiewouldgo 03-25-2022 01:01 PM

After listening to this series it is no surprise that our lead negotiator quit. His frustration with the company is palpable. He says that sections that should be very easily closed are stonewalled by the company. They are going to drag this out as long as possible and wait for the pilots of our union to accept a crappy TA. It’s the exact same playbook that was used during TA1 and 2.

But remember, you are the best pilots in the world and we appreciate everything that you do.

marcal 03-25-2022 03:38 PM


Originally Posted by Eddiewouldgo (Post 3394687)
After listening to this series it is no surprise that our lead negotiator quit. His frustration with the company is palpable. He says that sections that should be very easily closed are stonewalled by the company. They are going to drag this out as long as possible and wait for the pilots of our union to accept a crappy TA. It’s the exact same playbook that was used during TA1 and 2.

But remember, you are the best pilots in the world and we appreciate everything that you do.


Its the opposite of the strategy of TA1. In that contract, they utilized the good will and folksy-ness of Richard to get everyone all hot and bothered with an early deal and then slid in a whole bunch of garbage hoping no one would realize it. This group torpedoed it and any real good will with it.

The mood between alpa and the company has been drastically worse in my opinion since the huge failure of TA1.


In any negotiation you need to ask, “what do both sides need”? We obviously need pay, QOL improvements, JV improvements, etc.

What does the company need? Nothing really as far as I can tell. The airplanes are moving, there are lines of RJ and LCC pilots out the door waiting to get in. If I’m management I’d be going through the motions as long as possible and waiting this out. No rush.

Viper25 03-25-2022 03:49 PM

Legitimate question (from ignorance):

If the company is so obviously dragging this out, what is the mediator even doing there? Shouldn’t the mediator be calling this kind of stuff out?

NuGuy 03-25-2022 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by marcal (Post 3394739)
Its the opposite of the strategy of TA1. In that contract, they utilized the good will and folksy-ness of Richard to get everyone all hot and bothered with an early deal and then slid in a whole bunch of garbage hoping no one would realize it. This group torpedoed it and any real good will with it.

The mood between alpa and the company has been drastically worse in my opinion since the huge failure of TA1.

In any negotiation you need to ask, “what do both sides need”? We obviously need pay, QOL improvements, JV improvements, etc.

What does the company need? Nothing really as far as I can tell. The airplanes are moving, there are lines of RJ and LCC pilots out the door waiting to get in. If I’m management I’d be going through the motions as long as possible and waiting this out. No rush.

Eh. More than that. The FAR 117 LOA that had continuous duty overnights raised the alarm for everyone. By the time TA 1 rolled around, everyone was tuned in and paying attention.

gloopy 03-25-2022 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by Python1287 (Post 3394744)
Legitimate question (from ignorance):

If the company is so obviously dragging this out, what is the mediator even doing there? Shouldn’t the mediator be calling this kind of stuff out?

Te precedent has been set long ago that companies get 3-5 years to drag things out at a minimum. Sometimes even more.

theUpsideDown 03-25-2022 05:08 PM


Originally Posted by Python1287 (Post 3394744)
Legitimate question (from ignorance):

If the company is so obviously dragging this out, what is the mediator even doing there? Shouldn’t the mediator be calling this kind of stuff out?

Well, in my experience thats something they bring up separately, away from us. We did get feedback pre-covid and they told us what they felt the company may be misunderstanding about the process. Also, the company wanted things to move faster which is why they brought in the mediator- the fact its reversed seems strange. The company would love to negotiate this right now, before we start making money quarter after quarter.

We took record losses last year. We are starting to make money (profit) now supposedly. There isnt a payraise coming unless we are making a healthy profit quarter after quarter. Im not sure what the rush is, but im not a negotiator. Fat profits=raises. Banging hands on the table does not equal pay raises. I would caution the union to have patience, stay consistent, and find areas we can make gains on the company undervalues.

theUpsideDown 03-25-2022 05:14 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 3394765)
Te precedent has been set long ago that companies get 3-5 years to drag things out at a minimum. Sometimes even more.

This too, is true.

I would love it to move fast, but you cant count covid (at least i would be stone-cold stunned if we should be counting covid) years as negotiating year- because we didnt negotiate during that time.

Viper25 03-26-2022 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by hookshot123 (Post 3395000)
Good summary of why we will not have a contract for a long long time. As far as the mood between ALPA and the company I would add we now have a CEO who in my opinion despises the pilot group.

Thats something I don’t understand. I am totally on board with a CEO not liking the pilot group, seeing them as a huge expense, underworked, and arrogant (not my view). These are totally expected thoughts that a CEO would have. However in this case, it seems like it is different. It appears to be a deep, personal, emotional hatred. Maybe my perception is off base. But if it’s right, I’m trying to figure out why.

Der Meister 03-26-2022 07:13 AM


Originally Posted by Python1287 (Post 3395003)
Thats something I don’t understand. I am totally on board with a CEO not liking the pilot group, seeing them as a huge expense, underworked, and arrogant (not my view). These are totally expected thoughts that a CEO would have. However in this case, it seems like it is different. It appears to be a deep, personal, emotional hatred. Maybe my perception is off base. But if it’s right, I’m trying to figure out why.

Probably because we're one of the few employee groups that don't worship the ground he walks on. IMO Ed thinks very highly of himself and those that also don't see him that way, he dislikes.

notEnuf 03-26-2022 07:44 AM


Originally Posted by Der Meister (Post 3395021)
Probably because we're one of the few employee groups that don't worship the ground he walks on. IMO Ed thinks very highly of himself and those that also don't see him that was he dislikes.

I think we should get him a plaque to hang above his office door. Through this door walks… the greatest CEO/God.

Scoop 03-26-2022 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by marcal (Post 3394739)
Its the opposite of the strategy of TA1. In that contract, they utilized the good will and folksy-ness of Richard to get everyone all hot and bothered with an early deal and then slid in a whole bunch of garbage hoping no one would realize it. This group torpedoed it and any real good will with it.

The mood between alpa and the company has been drastically worse in my opinion since the huge failure of TA1.


In any negotiation you need to ask, “what do both sides need”? We obviously need pay, QOL improvements, JV improvements, etc.

What does the company need? Nothing really as far as I can tell. The airplanes are moving, there are lines of RJ and LCC pilots out the door waiting to get in. If I’m management I’d be going through the motions as long as possible and waiting this out. No rush.


Maybe, maybe not. How nimble will the company be when international travel opens up? Do we have enough LCA in the right position? How quickly can we complete TOEs? When movement returns at the top with us hiring 2000 pilots/year at the bottom end, it might limit our ability to ramp up in a timely manner when the world opens up.

Scoop

Pilot4000 03-27-2022 02:24 AM

I've never worked for a union before, being that my work experience has been all 91/135, so this podcast has been very helpful in helping me learn the system works. I am going to a different legacy, but I would imagine the basics are the same.

Iceberg 03-27-2022 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 3395035)
I think we should get him a plaque to hang above his office door. Through this door walks… the greatest CEO/God.

Don't forget the *.

*air line

Thruster 03-31-2022 07:22 AM

Another bump to pin this up top. Lots of good info in these.

Did they use the Training Day soundtrack? Love it.

JustNarced 03-31-2022 05:18 PM


Originally Posted by theUpsideDown (Post 3394771)
Well, in my experience thats something they bring up separately, away from us. We did get feedback pre-covid and they told us what they felt the company may be misunderstanding about the process. Also, the company wanted things to move faster which is why they brought in the mediator- the fact its reversed seems strange. The company would love to negotiate this right now, before we start making money quarter after quarter.

We took record losses last year. We are starting to make money (profit) now supposedly. There isnt a payraise coming unless we are making a healthy profit quarter after quarter. Im not sure what the rush is, but im not a negotiator. Fat profits=raises. Banging hands on the table does not equal pay raises. I would caution the union to have patience, stay consistent, and find areas we can make gains on the company undervalues.

This, all of this. Insane profits are coming. Just remember the dollar isn't what it once was when they do roll in.

Starcheck102 04-01-2022 04:46 PM


Originally Posted by NuGuy (Post 3394745)
Eh. More than that. The FAR 117 LOA that had continuous duty overnights raised the alarm for everyone. By the time TA 1 rolled around, everyone was tuned in and paying attention.

Do you mean the Split Duty Periods that the MEC directed at the August 2013 meeting?

theUpsideDown 04-07-2022 10:22 AM

Another good one

bugman61 04-07-2022 06:07 PM


Originally Posted by theUpsideDown (Post 3402087)
Another good one


I have an open mind to any agreement, and look forward to anything that truly guarantees equal growth and a better ratio. But color me skeptical of the “AE based” penalties they discussed.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands