Company breaking the contract again
#11
Can’t find crew pickup
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,981
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
No exactly correct. The intent of M7 is to protect the operation when they have a pop up short term need for a pilot for a specific rotation. It is not intended to be invoked on a blanket basis or to cover trips the next day. The fact the company can’t process open time on a timely basis is also not a reason to use M7. I believe the company acknowledged their use recently was not contractually correct.
#14
Pretty sure the intent of m7 is being violated and being forcefully expanded to a level that never was used before. At least that’s what the memo signed by anyone who ever dealt with this before says. This is a kin to a sick out on the pilots side. Yes, it’s in the PWA but you aren’t allowed to lead, coordinate and execute a harmful new tactic. This ignores the purpose of m7 and is like using emergency authority as a regular operating tool.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
No exactly correct. The intent of M7 is to protect the operation when they have a pop up short term need for a pilot for a specific rotation. It is not intended to be invoked on a blanket basis or to cover trips the next day. The fact the company can’t process open time on a timely basis is also not a reason to use M7. I believe the company acknowledged their use recently was not contractually correct.
Pretty sure the intent of m7 is being violated and being forcefully expanded to a level that never was used before. At least that’s what the memo signed by anyone who ever dealt with this before says. This is a kin to a sick out on the pilots side. Yes, it’s in the PWA but you aren’t allowed to lead, coordinate and execute a harmful new tactic. This ignores the purpose of m7 and is like using emergency authority as a regular operating tool.
has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
actually it’s 100% correct. There is NOTHING in the pwa or negotiators notes preventing them from covering trips this way.
when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.
has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.
has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
the problem is the one has huge holes in it. Especially with our history with arbitrators. “In the past we were able to cover trips timely, we can’t now so we implemented 23.m.7 to maintain schedule integrity” how do we counter that legally?
#18
"past practice"...Why does it seem like Past Practice is only used AGAINST the pilot group? Past examples include threatening pilot's jobs when the pilot group individually decides NOT to fly overtime trips. But the company can unilaterally change staffing procedures or trip mix as they see fit. Example, past trip mixes in certain bases were 15% one day trips, 15% 2-day trips, 40% 3-day trips, 20% 4-day and 10% 5-day trips. Current mix now 95% 3, 4, 5 day trips, 5% one and 2-day trips. What is the point of our dues money going to an ALPA RCC committee when the company completely ignores them?
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
actually it’s 100% correct. There is NOTHING in the pwa or negotiators notes preventing them from covering trips this way.
when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.
has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.
has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post