Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Company breaking the contract again >

Company breaking the contract again

Search
Notices

Company breaking the contract again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2022, 07:22 PM
  #11  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,981
Default

Originally Posted by Myfingershurt View Post
Didn’t UA and AA pare down there schedules to actually match for staffing?
Yes, most airlines already have. And UAL has all those 777s still parked. We haven’t pulled down anything. Leading to the current situation.
Whoopsmybad is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 07:54 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Fwiw they are not violating the contract by implementing m7. They are violating it by not identifying and paying the proper pilot until alpa submits a dispute
tunes is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:10 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
Fwiw they are not violating the contract by implementing m7. They are violating it by not identifying and paying the proper pilot until alpa submits a dispute
No exactly correct. The intent of M7 is to protect the operation when they have a pop up short term need for a pilot for a specific rotation. It is not intended to be invoked on a blanket basis or to cover trips the next day. The fact the company can’t process open time on a timely basis is also not a reason to use M7. I believe the company acknowledged their use recently was not contractually correct.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:17 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,027
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
Fwiw they are not violating the contract by implementing m7. They are violating it by not identifying and paying the proper pilot until alpa submits a dispute
Pretty sure the intent of m7 is being violated and being forcefully expanded to a level that never was used before. At least that’s what the memo signed by anyone who ever dealt with this before says. This is a kin to a sick out on the pilots side. Yes, it’s in the PWA but you aren’t allowed to lead, coordinate and execute a harmful new tactic. This ignores the purpose of m7 and is like using emergency authority as a regular operating tool.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:21 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
No exactly correct. The intent of M7 is to protect the operation when they have a pop up short term need for a pilot for a specific rotation. It is not intended to be invoked on a blanket basis or to cover trips the next day. The fact the company can’t process open time on a timely basis is also not a reason to use M7. I believe the company acknowledged their use recently was not contractually correct.
actually it’s 100% correct. There is NOTHING in the pwa or negotiators notes preventing them from covering trips this way.

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
Pretty sure the intent of m7 is being violated and being forcefully expanded to a level that never was used before. At least that’s what the memo signed by anyone who ever dealt with this before says. This is a kin to a sick out on the pilots side. Yes, it’s in the PWA but you aren’t allowed to lead, coordinate and execute a harmful new tactic. This ignores the purpose of m7 and is like using emergency authority as a regular operating tool.
when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.


has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
tunes is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:26 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
actually it’s 100% correct. There is NOTHING in the pwa or negotiators notes preventing them from covering trips this way.


when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.


has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
Past practice has as much weight as NN
CBreezy is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:29 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Past practice has as much weight as NN
the problem is the one has huge holes in it. Especially with our history with arbitrators. “In the past we were able to cover trips timely, we can’t now so we implemented 23.m.7 to maintain schedule integrity” how do we counter that legally?
tunes is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:40 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirbusPTC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Past practice has as much weight as NN
"past practice"...Why does it seem like Past Practice is only used AGAINST the pilot group? Past examples include threatening pilot's jobs when the pilot group individually decides NOT to fly overtime trips. But the company can unilaterally change staffing procedures or trip mix as they see fit. Example, past trip mixes in certain bases were 15% one day trips, 15% 2-day trips, 40% 3-day trips, 20% 4-day and 10% 5-day trips. Current mix now 95% 3, 4, 5 day trips, 5% one and 2-day trips. What is the point of our dues money going to an ALPA RCC committee when the company completely ignores them?
AirbusPTC is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:41 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
actually it’s 100% correct. There is NOTHING in the pwa or negotiators notes preventing them from covering trips this way.


when it was negotiated, the nc chair allowed it for both 23.n and 23.o…..which is all the way to end of next day rotations.


has it been used this way in the past? Not that anyone can find…do I think it’s bs? Absolutely, but nothing in the contract is preventing them from doing it. Unfortunately this is another one of those we didn’t think they would do that type of moments
Read the company letter on the use of M7. It’s a close as you will get to a outright admission they were wrong.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 08:42 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Read the company letter on the use of M7. It’s a close as you will get to a outright admission they were wrong.
I’ve read it. Forgive me for not believing their empty promises since they have already started doing it again.
tunes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Southwest
12
11-27-2020 01:53 PM
oldmako
United
103
10-25-2019 12:02 PM
1Seat 1Engine
Southwest
8
11-03-2015 10:37 AM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
Sunvox
United
24
05-07-2013 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices