![]() |
Reroute review
Got Rerouted into a day off during the snow storm in msp on January 3rd. Our flight attendants timed out in Vegas. Airport was back open at this point. No one in tracking/ scheduling/ duity pilot answering phones. We booked our own rooms and transportation. Flight went out the next day as same flight, just delayed 16 hours. No Reroute shown on schedule or pay on time card. I called and asked scheduling after rotation was closed about reroute pay. They said there is someone that reviews all that now. Takes a few weeks. Last week I was rerouted and it showed on my time card immediately. Is this a new thing that stated in January, or did scheduling just not want to deal with me.
|
I'm no expert on RR, but it probably matters if you're RESERVE v. LINEHOLDER, and if you're reserve, if you were rerouted into a "golden day" (which would be extraordinary)
|
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 3566726)
I'm no expert on RR, but it probably matters if you're RESERVE v. LINEHOLDER, and if you're reserve, if you were rerouted into a "golden day" (which would be extraordinary)
|
ACE report it as soon as possible.
|
RES RR
In order for RES to get RR pay, you have to get back > 4 hrs later than planned AND an off day needs to be violated. If you don't have both criteria, then no RR pay.
If you see "RR" on your schedule (REG or RES), it's just a pay code that means someone needs to review the rotation to see if RR pay is due. |
We are both line holders flown into our days off. No RR shown on schedule. Pairing shows closed. I will file an ace report, but waiting 3 month for it to get looked at is ridiculous.
|
Originally Posted by Gusser
(Post 3566817)
We are both line holders flown into our days off. No RR shown on schedule. Pairing shows closed. I will file an ace report, but waiting 3 month for it to get looked at is ridiculous.
Note: An alteration in the departure, enroute, or arrival time of a scheduled flight segment does not constitute a reroute. Page 23-5. From PWA |
Thanks for the response. We were also rerouted on day 2 of 4. Different flights, different overnight. We pick up the remainder of our trip on day 3. Arrived home a day late. I see how the last day doesn’t check to reroute box, but day 2 was a reroute day.
|
Originally Posted by Gusser
(Post 3566817)
We are both line holders flown into our days off. No RR shown on schedule. Pairing shows closed. I will file an ace report, but waiting 3 month for it to get looked at is ridiculous.
if the flight was never canceled (and you weren’t re-assigned), but merely 16 hours delayed.. you likely aren’t going to get re-Route pay.. no matter if it was 4 hours or 14 after original sign out. It’s a loophole. Ask me how I know.. you will, however, get whatever additional pay is contractual for TAFB or ADG rigs because of the delayed return to base. as for the 3 month delay in getting a response.. at the next Velvet, ask Laughter to stop violating our contract and the wait time won’t be nearly that long. Most of the volume is created by their inability to honor the agreement they signed in 2016. |
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3566840)
if the flight was never canceled (and you weren’t re-assigned), but merely 16 hours delayed.. you likely aren’t going to get re-Route pay.. no matter if it was 4 hours or 14 after original sign out. It’s a loophole. Ask me how I know..
Originally Posted by NJGov
(Post 3566840)
you will, however, get whatever additional pay is contractual for TAFB or ADG rigs because of the delayed return to base.
as for the 3 month delay in getting a response.. at the next Velvet, ask Laughter to stop violating our contract and the wait time won’t be nearly that long. Most of the volume is created by their inability to honor the agreement they signed in 2016. |
Just to complicate this issue a bit more I once had a flight get delayed on day 4 due to a dead battery. Was due to depart about noon. Instead we took the out the same flight number the next day. The original flight never operated. So instead of flight XXXX on the XXth we flew flight XXXX on the XXth +1. Different flight.
We got an extra days pay AND RR pay., |
Originally Posted by Boatbuilder
(Post 3566993)
Just to complicate this issue a bit more I once had a flight get delayed on day 4 due to a dead battery. Was due to depart about noon. Instead we took the out the same flight number the next day. The original flight never operated. So instead of flight XXXX on the XXth we flew flight XXXX on the XXth +1. Different flight.
We got an extra days pay AND RR pay., |
Originally Posted by Gusser
(Post 3566839)
Thanks for the response. We were also rerouted on day 2 of 4. Different flights, different overnight. We pick up the remainder of our trip on day 3. Arrived home a day late. I see how the last day doesn’t check to reroute box, but day 2 was a reroute day.
|
Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF
(Post 3566812)
In order for RES to get RR pay, you have to get back > 4 hrs later than planned AND an off day needs to be violated. If you don't have both criteria, then no RR pay.
If you see "RR" on your schedule (REG or RES), it's just a pay code that means someone needs to review the rotation to see if RR pay is due. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 3567098)
There's rarely any extra pay for reroutes within the footprint of the trip in this contract. Supposedly it's in the AIP though.
|
There are several ways Reserve can get RR pay other than 4+ hours late/X-day interruption.
One is 23.L.4.Note (uncovered legs over 14 hours must go to Open Time). Another is 23.L.11.c for an illegal turn time. It has to be a legal turn time at the time of reroute. Each station has a proprietary number, but a 10 minute turn ain’t legal anywhere. |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3567174)
It has to be a legal turn time at the time of reroute. Each station has a proprietary number, but a 10 minute turn ain’t legal anywhere.
|
Originally Posted by Hillbilly
(Post 3567209)
There is a :22 turn published in a bid package for a trip next month. It's a fly in and switch planes to a DH too. No human with any operational knowledge could look at that and think it's a good plan.
|
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 3567220)
I saw a number of questionable things in the Feb bid packet. Some teeth for the RCC can't come fast enough.
|
Originally Posted by konabear
(Post 3567700)
SEA 73N 4057/4058 look like fun.
DTW 320 6354 and L668 are good examples. If the suck. Lots of <12 hr layovers to boot. |
Those trips won’t have a high fatigue call rate, now way! 😳
|
Originally Posted by Tanker1497
(Post 3567753)
Those trips won’t have a high fatigue call rate, now way! 😳
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands