![]() |
717 winter ops question
How exactly would a 717 get contamination of flight surfaces (flaps in particular) during arrival/taxi or during frozen precipitation overnight that would cause the flaps unable to be set for takeoff setting following deicing/anti-ice operation.
|
Next time you land on a contaminated runway, then taxi is “slush” to the gate at midnight, for the jet to sit til the 6am departure…. It’ll make sense. Spent 5 years on that puppy, only a handful of times had to actually leave flaps out, but it made sense when it occurred.
Behind the tires (and shoved up into the flaps) would be a snowcone of yuckiness, frozen, into the extended flaps. |
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 3567326)
Next time you land on a contaminated runway, then taxi is “slush” to the gate at midnight, for the jet to sit til the 6am departure…. It’ll make sense. Spent 5 years on that puppy, only a handful of times had to actually leave flaps out, but it made sense when it occurred.
Behind the tires (and shoved up into the flaps) would be a snowcone of yuckiness, frozen, into the extended flaps. |
Originally Posted by Fletcheroes
(Post 3567319)
How exactly would a 717 get contamination of flight surfaces (flaps in particular) during arrival/taxi or during frozen precipitation overnight that would cause the flaps unable to be set for takeoff setting following deicing/anti-ice operation.
|
If I understand what you’re asking, on top of the issue of slush while taxiing.. the issue would be the leading edges icing up and then once retracted remain frozen and stick/freeze to the interior of the wing that can’t be sprayed. Just a guess though, had similar issues on another plane I’ve flown.
|
In some heavier icing the unheated portions of the wing can get significant buildup. Especially areas near the wing root and tips where the slats retract against. I’ve seen 2+ inches build up in there on the -88 before. Also the underside of the flap tracks from the tires as others have mentioned.
|
Originally Posted by Fletcheroes
(Post 3567351)
I understand, But would you not expect after deice/anti ice operation and required inspection that the aircraft would be clean and then dispatched or deiced again if was still contaminated to the point flaps would not deploy?
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 3567381)
So you land flaps 40, suck everything up to flaps zero (slats up too). Lots of moisture in there, plus crushing ice along the way of retraction, then only set flaps to 5/13/18 (if memory serves) for the next T/O. That’s a lot of extra potential crud iced up into the system. Land at 40 flaps, and all the gunk gets collected/frozen. Easier for the next crew to have all of that cleared out of the flaps/slats at full droop/mess and start fresh after. Not on the fleet anymore, but that’s the answer that likely hasn’t changed since the airframe design of the 60’s.
|
Originally Posted by higney85
(Post 3567381)
So you land flaps 40, suck everything up to flaps zero (slats up too). Lots of moisture in there, plus crushing ice along the way of retraction, then only set flaps to 5/13/18 (if memory serves) for the next T/O. That’s a lot of extra potential crud iced up into the system. Land at 40 flaps, and all the gunk gets collected/frozen. Easier for the next crew to have all of that cleared out of the flaps/slats at full droop/mess and start fresh after. Not on the fleet anymore, but that’s the answer that likely hasn’t changed since the airframe design of the 60’s.
Thanks, just never came across this situation |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands