![]() |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 3990839)
I rather have a bigger paycheck than PS. Considering also that PS has a higher tax bill than regular wages.
The more I make, the less I work. The less I work, the more time I have to live. |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 3990839)
I rather have a bigger paycheck than PS. Considering also that PS has a higher tax bill than regular wages.
The more I make, the less I work. The less I work, the more time I have to live. |
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 3990861)
oh god not this again. You will enjoy ONE contract cycle with higher wages. All subsequent contracts will then match united and american and that ps check in febuary that could give you 30 years of extra money will have been invested for just a boost in one 3 year cycle. Auto no vote if they touch my ps
|
Originally Posted by dbrownie
(Post 3990832)
?.???????!!!!!
Who talks like this? What does he want pay cuts? That was pretty much the end of the convo….for most of the trip. It was actually sad to hear someone talk like that—they don’t understand how this works. |
Originally Posted by Hubcapped
(Post 3990861)
oh god not this again. You will enjoy ONE contract cycle with higher wages. All subsequent contracts will then match united and american and that ps check in febuary that could give you 30 years of extra money will have been invested for just a boost in one 3 year cycle. Auto no vote if they touch my ps
wages > bonuses. We are all in agreement there. Nobody’s talking about trading PS for an hourly bump. |
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3990825)
By “technology”, I think you actually mean leadership? Investment decisions?
We also have tools in our PWA that they can use, but don’t. VAS for example…. |
Originally Posted by TegridyFarms
(Post 3990818)
I flew with a FO recently that said “our contract is costing the company too much money.”
Ok. So what? Is the company still making money? “But our profit sharing will be down?” Ok. So what? Our wages are up. This company is still making BILLIONS of dollars. Profit sharing is profit sharing. A contract is a contract. ALPA and the company agreed to the contract. Our wages as a group aren’t that big of a deal. Saying we (or our contract) are too expensive is disingenuous at best. A lot of the inefficiencies at this company can be traced back to technology, or lack thereof. |
Originally Posted by 172skychicken
(Post 3990776)
They were guiding for a stronger Q4 vs last year. That combined low fuel prices mean that I wouldn't write off 10% just yet. Usually they update guidance if they're tracking for a large miss. Wall street reacts very negatively to large misses on earnings day.
call me a permabear |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 3990839)
I rather have a bigger paycheck than PS. Considering also that PS has a higher tax bill than regular wages.
The more I make, the less I work. The less I work, the more time I have to live. |
Originally Posted by PilotJ3
(Post 3990839)
I rather have a bigger paycheck than PS. Considering also that PS has a higher tax bill than regular wages.
The more I make, the less I work. The less I work, the more time I have to live. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands