A possible solution?
#71
I know it will be solved. Just not as eloquently or simply as I recommend.
I call a spade a spade. AA is terrible for pilots and terrible for the company(which I stand by the premise that WE are the company). Mad at the execs? Ok I get it. But hurting the company doesn’t really hurt them anywhere near as much as most believe. That’s all.
AA en masse hurts all. Fact. Who started it? That’s not my argument.
I call a spade a spade. AA is terrible for pilots and terrible for the company(which I stand by the premise that WE are the company). Mad at the execs? Ok I get it. But hurting the company doesn’t really hurt them anywhere near as much as most believe. That’s all.
AA en masse hurts all. Fact. Who started it? That’s not my argument.
Let’s wait a couple more weeks to see how QS work.
#72
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 201
Likes: 113
I know it will be solved. Just not as eloquently or simply as I recommend.
I call a spade a spade. AA is terrible for pilots and terrible for the company(which I stand by the premise that WE are the company). Mad at the execs? Ok I get it. But hurting the company doesn’t really hurt them anywhere near as much as most believe. That’s all.
AA en masse hurts all. Fact. Who started it? That’s not my argument.
I call a spade a spade. AA is terrible for pilots and terrible for the company(which I stand by the premise that WE are the company). Mad at the execs? Ok I get it. But hurting the company doesn’t really hurt them anywhere near as much as most believe. That’s all.
AA en masse hurts all. Fact. Who started it? That’s not my argument.
We want the company to do well because that means we are doing well, but we should not be sacrificing pilot pay for the sake of the company when we are making billions in profit.
#73
Why do you think this?
The biggest QS problem was/is that it was a big secret until it was already a done deal, not withstanding the fact that it didn’t go to MEMRAT.
Im a ALPA supporter, but don’t overlook the fact there are some reps who simply think “they know best” and will tell us we just need to get in line with their agenda.
im pretty certain there are conversations happening on the side. Probably going to end up wasting leverage yet again.
#74
Get rid of Auto Accept.
If you don’t want nuisance calls, don’t put in a blanket slip. Tell it the hours you don’t want calls.
Or DND.
But putting in slips, and then complaining about getting calls for trips? Get out of here.
Unreal.
It is more important for trips to be covered than it is for you to be bothered. Turn your phone off.
This is the answer.
If you don’t want nuisance calls, don’t put in a blanket slip. Tell it the hours you don’t want calls.
Or DND.
But putting in slips, and then complaining about getting calls for trips? Get out of here.
Unreal.
It is more important for trips to be covered than it is for you to be bothered. Turn your phone off.
This is the answer.
As others have also said, many times here. I WANT that slip I've got a blanket slip in for. I just don't want (nor does my wife) to be woken up multiple times a night for trips I have no chance at getting! I should not have to miss/sacrifice that slip just because the company waits until 0300 to run the coverage.
The thing is, it's not a binary choice. There are multiple ways to 'skin the cat'. Batch sizes is one of them (and it WORKED). but there are others. Regardless, I trust our negotiators to address this in Section 6.
In the meantime, QS is literally around the corner (possibly next month, I hear). And that will address 98% of OUR problem. The company problem will have to wait for Section 6, and the quid better be massive to save them the double-digit millions a month they are wasting. At least, that's my opinion.
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,590
Likes: 346
#77
#78
are you very very junior? Please revisit this post in 10 years and ask yourself if anything has changed your opinion in that timeframe. Nobody is advocating sr dude gets everything while bottom guy gets nothing, but like anc suggested, seniority has been diluted a fair amount in the last few contract cycles so don’t be too surprised if posters don’t heartily agree with some of the ‘fixes’ outlined here.
the company can go a looooong way toward helping itself by choosing to cover trips earlier in time and treating the pilot group with respect. Instead they are focusing on a few problem children and punishing all of us for the few among all 17000.
the company can go a looooong way toward helping itself by choosing to cover trips earlier in time and treating the pilot group with respect. Instead they are focusing on a few problem children and punishing all of us for the few among all 17000.
Its not a matter of changing our minds, its a matter of the perspective of the industry with which we came up with.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 107
From: Road construction signholder
You are entitled to your opinion. However, I think you are pretty much on an island in this one.
As others have also said, many times here. I WANT that slip I've got a blanket slip in for. I just don't want (nor does my wife) to be woken up multiple times a night for trips I have no chance at getting! I should not have to miss/sacrifice that slip just because the company waits until 0300 to run the coverage.
The thing is, it's not a binary choice. There are multiple ways to 'skin the cat'. Batch sizes is one of them (and it WORKED). but there are others. Regardless, I trust our negotiators to address this in Section 6.
In the meantime, QS is literally around the corner (possibly next month, I hear). And that will address 98% of OUR problem. The company problem will have to wait for Section 6, and the quid better be massive to save them the double-digit millions a month they are wasting. At least, that's my opinion.
As others have also said, many times here. I WANT that slip I've got a blanket slip in for. I just don't want (nor does my wife) to be woken up multiple times a night for trips I have no chance at getting! I should not have to miss/sacrifice that slip just because the company waits until 0300 to run the coverage.
The thing is, it's not a binary choice. There are multiple ways to 'skin the cat'. Batch sizes is one of them (and it WORKED). but there are others. Regardless, I trust our negotiators to address this in Section 6.
In the meantime, QS is literally around the corner (possibly next month, I hear). And that will address 98% of OUR problem. The company problem will have to wait for Section 6, and the quid better be massive to save them the double-digit millions a month they are wasting. At least, that's my opinion.
That means the claim of "I only use Auto Accept to avoid nuisance trip calls for trips I know I can't get" is often times a bunch of hypocritical crocodile tears. 50 pilots all had "first shot" at the trip--and it took that long for someone to accept it.
Most pilots mass blasting AA are doing so for cynical reasons, and we all know it. What? That ATL 320B, living in FLL, might actually not be able to make a SEA OOBWS trip? "Here's my shocked face."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





