Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-21-2012, 02:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
They chose not to because there was debate and differing opinions. We can see that from the vote split. Putting something out prior to the vote that may have needed modifications is not wise.
I am sure they are looking over the NNP and uploading the Live Contract to the web site. As soon as all of those involved sign off on it.
We screamed for them to enforce the seven day window and they did.
I am sure they are looking over the NNP and uploading the Live Contract to the web site. As soon as all of those involved sign off on it.
We screamed for them to enforce the seven day window and they did.
05-21-2012, 02:09 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Be quiet and read. I'm starting Section 1... this will take several passes.
05-21-2012, 02:11 PM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Originally Posted by Sink r8
Be quiet and read. I'm starting Section 1... this will take several passes.
05-21-2012, 02:12 PM
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 31
Looks like vacation goes from 3:00 to 3:15 and a fifth week has been added for over 19 years of service.
I was hoping for closer to 5:00.
I was hoping for closer to 5:00.
05-21-2012, 02:13 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
1 C 9... isn't that saying we will operate with fewer than two pilots?
05-21-2012, 02:16 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
The Company will accept the integrated
9 seniority list produced under Association merger policy, provided that none
10 of the attendant conditions and restrictions therein:
[blah blah]
20 d. significantly increase the Company's costs,
[blah blah]
Really? If the company has to spend money for a list we negotiate, it can refuse it?
Really?
9 seniority list produced under Association merger policy, provided that none
10 of the attendant conditions and restrictions therein:
[blah blah]
20 d. significantly increase the Company's costs,
[blah blah]
Really? If the company has to spend money for a list we negotiate, it can refuse it?
Really?
05-21-2012, 02:17 PM
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
ACL, good post.
I did say I'd take 4/8.5/3/3 if we got paid by the duty
hour. Thats true but also a joke because if we got that we'd have new hires buying a caddilac a month.
So I'll wait to read it. I do think some regular pilots should take a moment and grab their pay from previous months so we can TRY to apply new work rules with pay. I'll give them a momentary benefit of doubt that maybe the work rules make 4% into something much higher than now.
That said... this whole thing ain't exactly giving me hope it'll get much better. I think I am ready to go-around on this.
I did say I'd take 4/8.5/3/3 if we got paid by the duty
hour. Thats true but also a joke because if we got that we'd have new hires buying a caddilac a month.
So I'll wait to read it. I do think some regular pilots should take a moment and grab their pay from previous months so we can TRY to apply new work rules with pay. I'll give them a momentary benefit of doubt that maybe the work rules make 4% into something much higher than now.
That said... this whole thing ain't exactly giving me hope it'll get much better. I think I am ready to go-around on this.
05-21-2012, 02:19 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
1 D 9 looks... meatier.
But here's a morsel for you FM survivors:
e. The Company will only be excused from compliance with the minimum ratio of
24 MBH to DBH:
25 1) if it was projected to be in compliance with the minimum ratio of MBH to
26 DBH in both of the preceding six month projection periods (i.e., both the
27 January 1 and July 1 projections of the preceding 12 months), or
28 2) in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is
29 the cause of such noncompliance.
But here's a morsel for you FM survivors:
e. The Company will only be excused from compliance with the minimum ratio of
24 MBH to DBH:
25 1) if it was projected to be in compliance with the minimum ratio of MBH to
26 DBH in both of the preceding six month projection periods (i.e., both the
27 January 1 and July 1 projections of the preceding 12 months), or
28 2) in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is
29 the cause of such noncompliance.
05-21-2012, 02:22 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: M88A MSP
Posts: 117
I'm proud of my Council 1 reps. This PMDL transplant in MSP is very thankful! They obviously listened to their membership. A big NO and a card has been sent to order some donuts.
05-21-2012, 02:23 PM
Happy to be here
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Originally Posted by 944Turbo
I'm proud of my Council 1 reps. This PMDL transplant in MSP is very thankful! They obviously listened to their membership. A big NO and a card has been sent to order some donuts.
It is not a N v S thing and leave it right there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
