Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2009, 10:11 AM
  #5991  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,705
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
Expect to see the DC9-30s and 40s to get retired as they come up on heavy checks. The -50s will be here for at least five more years however. The costs on the smaller -9s coupled with the costs of the heavy checks make them untenable. The big question right now is what do we replace them with. With the pullbacks around the system, the immediate need is not there. But with the anticipated pick up next year, they will need to do something to replace this lift.
I can see why the DC9s would be retired eventually, as the costs are high relative to RJs. But - the DC9 carry plenty of pax. Sure, you can run two RJs instead of one DC-9, but you also have to have more gates, ramp and gate personnel to operate the additional flights.

If I was making long range planes (because new aircraft need to be useful for 20 years), I'd order 737-800s and lots of them to replace the MD fleet. Better ASM and 737s are in demand - if we need to, we can sell them for quick cash in five or ten years. Does anyone know the typical age of our MD88s and MD90s?
iaflyer is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 10:55 AM
  #5992  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dragon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Dismayed
Posts: 1,594
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer View Post
Does anyone know the typical age of our MD88s and MD90s?
Average age for the MD-88 is 18.3 years and 12.9 for the MD-90 (does not include the 3 new ones). The oldest 88 is 21.6 years and the youngest is 14.9.
dragon is online now  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:00 AM
  #5993  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
I don't believe the costs of the 777 being higher than that of the 747. Even Boeing's website says the 747 is more expensive to operate. Which is in line with DAL management touting the end of the 747 in a couple of years.
That could be a statistical error due to the low number of airframe, or accounting for costs to place new ones in service, within a SMALL fleet. The 2007 MD90 numbers were skewed all out of whack, which can happen with a small fleet. They returned to normal in 2008.

It will be interesting to see the 08-09 numbers since that will include the worst part of the fuel price explosion in the last half of 08.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:42 AM
  #5994  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer View Post
Sure, you can run two RJs instead of one DC-9, but you also have to have more gates, ramp and gate personnel to operate the additional flights.
Not if they are in there at different times, i.e. more frequency.

Scratch, that. Sounds like I am supporting RJ's...

Disreguard
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:51 AM
  #5995  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,705
Default

Originally Posted by Jay5150 View Post
Not if they are in there at different times, i.e. more frequency.

Scratch, that. Sounds like I am supporting RJ's...
No, I didn't mean at the same time. Even if they are at different times, eventually you'll need more ramp and staff. Sure - a station can probably fit one more RJ into the mix, but many of them sure seem overloaded with one RJ, much less two at the same time!
iaflyer is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:56 AM
  #5996  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

number 5997
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:56 AM
  #5997  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

number 5998
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:57 AM
  #5998  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

number 5999
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 11:57 AM
  #5999  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

SIX THOUSAND... can you imagine how long this would last if it were dollars in the Obama budget?
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 12:04 PM
  #6000  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

CHEATER!

If we ever got to post 3,700,000,000,000, it's going to be a bunch of pilots going... "DID YOU HEAR that they want to replace the Mercury to Venus shuttle with Boeing shuttles?!? Who in their right mind ever buys a Boeing product? If you want a high quality efficient large shuttle you purchase a Cessna Shuttle, not a Boeing. Of course nothing is as good as that Eclipse Shuttle, man those people know what they're doing. And oh yeah, any word on the next AE and whats our furlough status now that we're not doing Mars direct to Saturns 4th moon Prometheus. I can't believe we're not continuing service, thats such a money maker."
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices