Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2011, 07:11 AM
  #61691  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post

As for when I feel it is a time to fight, when our PWA has been violated. In Section six, when we are not going to get what we deserve, but to be able to fight effectively we need to be unified. Reality is that this thread and the DPA thread prove that we can be divided and conquered very easily. We can still change that though.
So are we going to unify around surrender and mediocrity? Or are we going to unify around restoring our profession and our careers? It seems that ALPA is all about the former. And if they can't get behind the latter, then they are of little use and I think we need to try something different. A good number of us will not unify around surrender and mediocrity. There's your problem.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:14 AM
  #61692  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
If what you say is true, and a company or anything else was structured to get around any part of our contract, this is the perfect time to go to court to fight it. Just because it appears they have legally out maneuvered us, it does not mean we should approve the tactic by non-action.

The is a such thing as negotiating and contracting in good faith. If any party to a contract purposely acts in a way that is counter to the understanding of the agreement, I would argue that that party is in breach. Period.
Like I said, file a grievance and start the process. If you want a group grievance, go for it. Prior to going to the company though, the Contract Admin will lay out the case with the lawyers and give you the facts. After this has transpired, maybe people will understand why it is the way it is.

Just because it is this way does not mean I like it. If you recall, I was irked when RJET bought MEH, and wanted what you want. I read the facts and was shown the reality of the situation.

Best one can hope for is that they go down to one certificate, or jets larger than 76 seats are operated on a certificate that operates our flying. To date that is not happening.

As for CHQ flying and the 145, they do not fly jets larger than 76 seats.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:20 AM
  #61693  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
What you fail to acknowledge here is that we are divided because ALPA isn't fighting for us. DPA with its warts was an attempt to reverse that.

The only thing being conquered is ALPA...
That is where you are wrong. ALPA and DALPA fights every day for you. I see it. What is different is that they do not fight for the sake of fighting, they fight, fights that are legitimate. They are not going to pick a fight just for the sake of it. Wanting your union to fight a fight just for the sake of the fight will cause more harm that good. There are better ways to resolve the RJET deal than heading in to a fight were the current facts do not favor us. I have stated how.

Also, look at the latest 10K and look at when these contracts are expiring, even the new ones. Everything will be gone in ten years. Force DAL's hand to commit to stopping the outsourcing as these expire, do not try to reverse engineer our PWA language. Everyone will see though it. We agreed to it, now we have to undo it.

DPA has some good idea, I even admit that, but the reality is that everyone that I have talked to that is "pro dpa" has issues with people within alpa and not the structure. Reality is the structure of the independents mirrors DALPA and CAPA loosely mirrors ALPA. If you want and demand change, work for it within the structure that is in place, because after all, DPA will have a similar structure. Why? You can answer that.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:25 AM
  #61694  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DAL Widebody
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg View Post
Its all pattern bargaining after all, so lets see where we're at.

Originally Posted by Fly4hire View Post
Better hope we break that paradigm if you want much of an improvement
It would appear, according to our new MEC Chairman (and former ALPA Collective Bargaining Chair), that pattern bargaining ended around 2001 (reference the graph on page 34):

http://www.alpa.org/publications/air_line_pilot_october_2010/Air_Line_Pilot_October_2010.pdf

Maybe someone could 'update' it for us?
FlighTimeBarbie is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:25 AM
  #61695  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
And where does it say Shuttle America? They are stating dour different airlines. Shuttle America does a a lot of our flying, fwiw. Probably is not omitted by mistake!!!

Single Carrier status would be great. I would want nothing more than to see this happen, but given the language in our PWA, and past practices, unless something changes within their structure, there is little leverage.
Gotcha... it doesn't matter because chatauqua does plenty of flying on our certificate as well. So what gives? Gonna try to squirm out of this one?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:27 AM
  #61696  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
...to be able to fight effectively we need to be unified.
Agree 100%
That's why its DALPAs job is to foster unity in the pilot group.
It's called a Union for a reason.

Unfortunately there are some inside DALPA that have made this into an us vs them fight. Their definition of Union is to crush dissent.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Reality is that this thread and the DPA thread prove that we can be divided and conquered very easily.
This thread with all its banter is no real indication of the pilot group as a whole...

Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:28 AM
  #61697  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by RickyBobby View Post
For what it's worth, the CEO of Continental Resources was on CNBC this evening. He says it costs them ~$60/bbl to extract.

News Headlines

RB

Back around 2005 I was flying with a guy that used to be the comptroller at Chevron. He did that for 25 years. He was also in Libya when they nationalized all the U.S. assets for pennies on the dollar. This guy is a walking bag of numbers. He went into great detail on the costs and break even point associated with the oil sands. The number was between $50-60. If oil could stabilized above that price then you would see significant investment in oil sand/shale extraction. In his time at Chevron oil was too cheap to invest in sand/shale.
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:29 AM
  #61698  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
So are we going to unify around surrender and mediocrity? Or are we going to unify around restoring our profession and our careers? It seems that ALPA is all about the former. And if they can't get behind the latter, then they are of little use and I think we need to try something different. A good number of us will not unify around surrender and mediocrity. There's your problem.
unify around the organization that has the structure in place to get the greatest gains, and to effectively protect your career.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:30 AM
  #61699  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Gotcha... it doesn't matter because chatauqua does plenty of flying on our certificate as well. So what gives? Gonna try to squirm out of this one?

He's heard the "facts"
scambo1 is offline  
Old 03-16-2011, 07:31 AM
  #61700  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
. Reality is that this thread and the DPA thread prove that we can be divided and conquered very easily. We can still change that though.
Dude, if you think that EVERYBODY is going to fall in live with your beloved alpa and just froth at the mouth over every word that comes out of the national HQ, you seriously need to be drug tested.... There are 12,000 guys here, and there will be quite a few of them that will not agree with the national agenda. If that is what you think will lead to us being conquered, then we are doomed.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices