Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
As for when I feel it is a time to fight, when our PWA has been violated. In Section six, when we are not going to get what we deserve, but to be able to fight effectively we need to be unified. Reality is that this thread and the DPA thread prove that we can be divided and conquered very easily. We can still change that though.
If what you say is true, and a company or anything else was structured to get around any part of our contract, this is the perfect time to go to court to fight it. Just because it appears they have legally out maneuvered us, it does not mean we should approve the tactic by non-action.
The is a such thing as negotiating and contracting in good faith. If any party to a contract purposely acts in a way that is counter to the understanding of the agreement, I would argue that that party is in breach. Period.
The is a such thing as negotiating and contracting in good faith. If any party to a contract purposely acts in a way that is counter to the understanding of the agreement, I would argue that that party is in breach. Period.
Just because it is this way does not mean I like it. If you recall, I was irked when RJET bought MEH, and wanted what you want. I read the facts and was shown the reality of the situation.
Best one can hope for is that they go down to one certificate, or jets larger than 76 seats are operated on a certificate that operates our flying. To date that is not happening.
As for CHQ flying and the 145, they do not fly jets larger than 76 seats.
Also, look at the latest 10K and look at when these contracts are expiring, even the new ones. Everything will be gone in ten years. Force DAL's hand to commit to stopping the outsourcing as these expire, do not try to reverse engineer our PWA language. Everyone will see though it. We agreed to it, now we have to undo it.
DPA has some good idea, I even admit that, but the reality is that everyone that I have talked to that is "pro dpa" has issues with people within alpa and not the structure. Reality is the structure of the independents mirrors DALPA and CAPA loosely mirrors ALPA. If you want and demand change, work for it within the structure that is in place, because after all, DPA will have a similar structure. Why? You can answer that.
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DAL Widebody
Posts: 104
It would appear, according to our new MEC Chairman (and former ALPA Collective Bargaining Chair), that pattern bargaining ended around 2001 (reference the graph on page 34):
http://www.alpa.org/publications/air_line_pilot_october_2010/Air_Line_Pilot_October_2010.pdf
Maybe someone could 'update' it for us?
And where does it say Shuttle America? They are stating dour different airlines. Shuttle America does a a lot of our flying, fwiw. Probably is not omitted by mistake!!!
Single Carrier status would be great. I would want nothing more than to see this happen, but given the language in our PWA, and past practices, unless something changes within their structure, there is little leverage.
Single Carrier status would be great. I would want nothing more than to see this happen, but given the language in our PWA, and past practices, unless something changes within their structure, there is little leverage.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Agree 100%
That's why its DALPAs job is to foster unity in the pilot group.
It's called a Union for a reason.
Unfortunately there are some inside DALPA that have made this into an us vs them fight. Their definition of Union is to crush dissent.
This thread with all its banter is no real indication of the pilot group as a whole...
Cheers
George
That's why its DALPAs job is to foster unity in the pilot group.
It's called a Union for a reason.
Unfortunately there are some inside DALPA that have made this into an us vs them fight. Their definition of Union is to crush dissent.
Cheers
George
For what it's worth, the CEO of Continental Resources was on CNBC this evening. He says it costs them ~$60/bbl to extract.
News Headlines
RB
News Headlines
RB
Back around 2005 I was flying with a guy that used to be the comptroller at Chevron. He did that for 25 years. He was also in Libya when they nationalized all the U.S. assets for pennies on the dollar. This guy is a walking bag of numbers. He went into great detail on the costs and break even point associated with the oil sands. The number was between $50-60. If oil could stabilized above that price then you would see significant investment in oil sand/shale extraction. In his time at Chevron oil was too cheap to invest in sand/shale.
So are we going to unify around surrender and mediocrity? Or are we going to unify around restoring our profession and our careers? It seems that ALPA is all about the former. And if they can't get behind the latter, then they are of little use and I think we need to try something different. A good number of us will not unify around surrender and mediocrity. There's your problem.
Dude, if you think that EVERYBODY is going to fall in live with your beloved alpa and just froth at the mouth over every word that comes out of the national HQ, you seriously need to be drug tested.... There are 12,000 guys here, and there will be quite a few of them that will not agree with the national agenda. If that is what you think will lead to us being conquered, then we are doomed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post