Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,911
Its an optional extra free higher priority than an S3. If they want a full S2, use one of theirs. Simple.
There is no entitlement for a spouse trying to go with a spouse on a holiday to bump a pilot trying to get to/from work on a holiday when the pilot is even willing to burn an S2 to do so. In that case, the pilot using an S2 should absolutely go ahead of the spouse who isn't even willing or able to (because they already used them all up or want to save them for something else).
There is no entitlement for a spouse trying to go with a spouse on a holiday to bump a pilot trying to get to/from work on a holiday when the pilot is even willing to burn an S2 to do so. In that case, the pilot using an S2 should absolutely go ahead of the spouse who isn't even willing or able to (because they already used them all up or want to save them for something else).
Its an optional extra free higher priority than an S3. If they want a full S2, use one of theirs. Simple.
There is no entitlement for a spouse trying to go with a spouse on a holiday to bump a pilot trying to get to/from work on a holiday when the pilot is even willing to burn an S2 to do so. In that case, the pilot using an S2 should absolutely go ahead of the spouse who isn't even willing or able to (because they already used them all up or want to save them for something else).
There is no entitlement for a spouse trying to go with a spouse on a holiday to bump a pilot trying to get to/from work on a holiday when the pilot is even willing to burn an S2 to do so. In that case, the pilot using an S2 should absolutely go ahead of the spouse who isn't even willing or able to (because they already used them all up or want to save them for something else).
And speaking of nonrev roulette, I'm going to try and get 5 to TLV in February. I know El-Al is a great backup with that great big 747 they fly every day. Any gotchas I need to be aware of coming or going?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
I thought our FOM used to have pretty clear guidance about animals with hooves and birds not qualifying as emotional support animals. Now there's just some vague reference to having ACS verify requirements which helps me not one iota. They also clearly added guidance that requires we deny boarding to passengers who appear intoxicated. Pretty sure it was always in the FARs, but now it is specified in the FOM as of the 7 October update.
I thought our FOM used to have pretty clear guidance about animals with hooves and birds not qualifying as emotional support animals. Now there's just some vague reference to having ACS verify requirements which helps me not one iota. They also clearly added guidance that requires we deny boarding to passengers who appear intoxicated. Pretty sure it was always in the FARs, but now it is specified in the FOM as of the 7 October update.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Posts: 1,034
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post