Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 08-26-2014, 10:23 AM
  #1011  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Again with the litany of non sequiturs.

First of all, what "records"? Numerous airlines do SDP's (many with considerably less protections than we had in the TA that I didn't like, and WAY less protections than I'm advocating as a minimum) so where are these records that are supposedly settled law?

We live and work in a 24 hour world. We can't reverse engineer circadian babysitting of rogue pilots who shoot type A between their toes every chance they get trying to run side businesses and be super parent or whatever. Some pilots may like SDP's because they can work all day at home and fly on 1 hour of sleep or whatever. But guess what? Some pilots like long haul international for that exact same reason. Domestic trips with day sleeps and red eyes. Home by breakfast for a full day's work chopping firewood while day trading, then a quick little league double header before another evening report.

How about all those 5am reports we do? Do you really think every single pilot is fast asleep by 7 or 8PM getting uninterrupted full cycle REM restorative sleep every single time? Have you ever done a report that early and not gotten a full uninterrupted 8 hours? Did you call out fatigued? Every single time?

There is nothing in SDP's, if done reasonably, that is any less safe than a lot of flying every single 121 operator already does safely every single day.

If you are so opposed to them, and you somehow get one, and you are automatically going to call in fatigued in the morning no matter what, then do what you have to do. Safety first, and if you're not fit to fly then its what you must do.

But pulling the panic cord on something that a lot of pilots actually like and is in fact no less safe than many other operations we currently do doesn't do us any good. Funny thing is, SDP's would likely replace a lot of 30 hour layovers with early AM reports followed by long 4-5 leg days. Hope every single pilot gets to sleep by 7PM every single time, or those would also lead to tons of fatigue calls too, right? At least the duty day in question is 10 times longer with the same report time and likely on the same amount of actual sleep, so there's that.
Of course there is no "record" on it. Be honest. How many pilots have you known over the years that do CDO's and get 8 hours of sleep during the day in preparation? If you're honest, I'll bet that number is close to if not equal to ZERO.

CDO's were invented by sleezeball regional airlines as a way AROUND the FAR rest requirements. Yeah, I know NWA had them but who else in this industry has/had them? I know TWA didn't. I know Delta didn't/doesn't. I don't think American does. It's mainly been a regional airline thing. I observed it closely enough during my short stint at AMR Eagle to know how the sleep situation is routinely handled. I don't need an official stat. You don't either. Both of us know that the vast majority of pilots who like and bid CDO's do so because it allows them to be off during the day so they can do stuff they want/need to do, and the only sleep they get in the 24 hour period is whatever sleep the CDO provides at the hotel. And most of the time that's going to be at best 3 or 4 hours of actual sleep. Two zombies the next morning flying me or my family? No thanks!

Just because we have other types of flying that present sleep/rest challenges, doesn't mean we need to add more. CDO's are a VERY bad idea. Period.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:30 AM
  #1012  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
That depends on the details. I'd want protections for reserves like nothing once you get back until 10AM the next day.
Why would that be necessary? If the pilot gets his FAR 117 mandated "8 hour uninterrupted sleep opportunity" during his 10 hour minimum rest prior to beginning the CDO, then we're all good, right?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:30 AM
  #1013  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
Of course there are no "record" on it. Be honest. How many pilots have you known over the years that do CDO's and get 8 hours of sleep during the day in preparation? If you're honest, I'll bet that number is close to if not equal to ZERO.
And what percentage of red eyes are done by a full cycle 8 hour REM restorative sleep crew? International? 30 hour layover followed by a 5AM show? Any 5AM show?

I've done off cycle flying for years, and I adapted my schedule for it. Its really no big deal. I'd rather fly all night consistently than do 5AM shows and off cycle red eyes and random day sleeps.

Not only are properly done SDP's as safe as some flying we currently do, they are safer than some, and having them would remove some other flying that is questionable for circadian concerns. Do you really think 5am reports followed by a 4-5 leg full length duty day are really less safe than a reasonable SDP? Even on the exact same amount of sleep the night before?

In any case, if you don't want them, you'd very likely never see one, even on reserve.
gloopy is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:38 AM
  #1014  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Do you really think 5am reports followed by a 4-5 leg full length duty day are really less safe than a reasonable SDP? Even on the exact same amount of sleep the night before?
Trouble is that it's not going to be on "the exact same amount of sleep." The CDO pilot is going to have maybe 3 or 4 hours of sleep in the 24 hour period. That has been proven out over the years by the way pilots who bid these atrocities handle them.

The 5am report followed by a 4-5 leg day is handled the same way I handled it on my last trip a few days ago. I planned for it on the layover. I ate an early dinner. I got a good long workout in. And I went to bed and went to sleep around 8pm. I got 8 hours of sleep.

Personally, I hate the early morning go's like that. And if I had the seniority in my category to do it, I would bid around it. But it's manageable for me when I have to do it. On a CDO, I personally could not do that (get 8 hours of sleep during the day in preparation). I know some can. But I submit that most cannot and/or will not.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:39 AM
  #1015  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
Why would that be necessary? If the pilot gets his FAR 117 mandated "8 hour uninterrupted sleep opportunity" during his 10 hour minimum rest prior to beginning the CDO, then we're all good, right?
Again with the non sequiturs.

I am in favor of reasonable circadian protections for off cycle flying. I also think the 10am next day limit should be applied to reserves that do red eyes. However in order to make your point, you have to make up bare bones FAR scenarios that I'm not only not suggesting, but that I'm actively advocating against.

I don't want FAR minimum SDP's or a return to the regional dirt bag manager days of crews sleeping on plywood planks between the seats. It does this discussion no good to flame it with such extreme hyperbole. All you end up doing is setting up a straw man for others to knock down and IMO that makes it more likely we will see SDP's. Unreasonable resistance will become a catalyst to actually enable them the more people cry wolf on this issue.

But why the helmet fire on this anyway? If done right, and that's what this discussion should really be about, they are not one ounce more dangerous than tons of flying we currently do, and are safer than some flying we currently do. I don't advocate a wild west fly to the FAR's management fantasy. Far from it. I want numerous layers of protections for lineholders and reserves alike.

They are desirable, can pay well, and can significantly increase the QOL for both those that do them and those that don't, and they can do it just as safe or safer than flying we currently do.
gloopy is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:47 AM
  #1016  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Again with the non sequiturs.

I am in favor of reasonable circadian protections for off cycle flying. I also think the 10am next day limit should be applied to reserves that do red eyes. However in order to make your point, you have to make up bare bones FAR scenarios that I'm not only not suggesting, but that I'm actively advocating against.

I don't want FAR minimum SDP's or a return to the regional dirt bag manager days of crews sleeping on plywood planks between the seats. It does this discussion no good to flame it with such extreme hyperbole. All you end up doing is setting up a straw man for others to knock down and IMO that makes it more likely we will see SDP's. Unreasonable resistance will become a catalyst to actually enable them the more people cry wolf on this issue.

But why the helmet fire on this anyway? If done right, and that's what this discussion should really be about, they are not one ounce more dangerous than tons of flying we currently do, and are safer than some flying we currently do. I don't advocate a wild west fly to the FAR's management fantasy. Far from it. I want numerous layers of protections for lineholders and reserves alike.

They are desirable, can pay well, and can significantly increase the QOL for both those that do them and those that don't, and they can do it just as safe or safer than flying we currently do.
I feel I've already answered/addressed all those points. Just because my opinion differs from yours doesn't make it a "non sequitur." It sounds like we're talking past each other and I'm not going to waste anymore of my time or yours doing that. I completely disagree with your argument on this. Maybe it's just best if we leave it at that. In any case, I won't be doing CDO's... one way or the other. If this pilot group is ultimately dumb enough to allow them, well there's nothing I can do to stop it.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 10:58 AM
  #1017  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
10 hours sleep is NOT a CDO. Not even close. Try again. And if I read that right, it would be worth 10:30 to me.
That's one of our SDTs, so I don't know what to tell you. Here is the worst one in the system I suppose:

TRIP #524 D7523 DTW: 1_34__7 effective SEP 07-SEP 29 except SEP 08 SEP 15 SEP 17 SEP 22 SEP 24
DAY FLT# DEP ARR DEP ARR BLK SAT TOG DUTY CREDIT LO CODE F/24 TAFB A/C
---- ----------- --- --- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ --------- ---- ----- ---
RPT (01)21:06 0h45
Su 1 03921 DTW SWF (01)21:51 (03)23:32 1h41 1h37 6h28 1h37 DutyRm 0h00 2h26 CPJ
Mo 2 03755 SWF DTW (10)06:00 (11)07:45 1h45 1h49 1h49 0h00 10h39 CPJ
RLS (12)08:00 3h26 0h15 10h54 4h00(M)
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______
TAFB: 10h54 Block Time: 3h26 Credit Time: 4h00(D) 16.5048543
__________________________________________________ ______________

Time on the ground is 6:28. I admit, this one is awful because of the 1:45 leg time.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:03 AM
  #1018  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
That's one of our SDTs, so I don't know what to tell you. Here is the worst one in the system I suppose:

TRIP #524 D7523 DTW: 1_34__7 effective SEP 07-SEP 29 except SEP 08 SEP 15 SEP 17 SEP 22 SEP 24
DAY FLT# DEP ARR DEP ARR BLK SAT TOG DUTY CREDIT LO CODE F/24 TAFB A/C
---- ----------- --- --- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ --------- ---- ----- ---
RPT (01)21:06 0h45
Su 1 03921 DTW SWF (01)21:51 (03)23:32 1h41 1h37 6h28 1h37 DutyRm 0h00 2h26 CPJ
Mo 2 03755 SWF DTW (10)06:00 (11)07:45 1h45 1h49 1h49 0h00 10h39 CPJ
RLS (12)08:00 3h26 0h15 10h54 4h00(M)
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _______
TAFB: 10h54 Block Time: 3h26 Credit Time: 4h00(D) 16.5048543
__________________________________________________ ______________

Time on the ground is 6:28. I admit, this one is awful because of the 1:45 leg time.
I sure did that one a lot. Might as well have been drunk on the 4th one in a row.

That was also the last trip that the Pinnacle 3701 captain flew before his accident trip... with me.

They can be done safely with lots of restrictions on them, but the 117 loa did not deliver enough restrictions. We had to have more ground time at 9E than the 117 loa!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 11:39 AM
  #1019  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
I sure did that one a lot. Might as well have been drunk on the 4th one in a row.

That was also the last trip that the Pinnacle 3701 captain flew before his accident trip... with me.

They can be done safely with lots of restrictions on them, but the 117 loa did not deliver enough restrictions. We had to have more ground time at 9E than the 117 loa!
Yeah, the 2.5 hour leg restriction made it a non starter, obviously, but they can be done. Here's what's needed, based on my experience:
Minimum 5 hours rest, non-violate, behind the door, at the hotel.
Hotel must be within 10 minutes of the airport.
Max 1.5 hour leg for flights departing between 7PM-8:30PM local
Max 1 hour leg for flights departing between 8:30PM-10:30PM local
No flights allowed past 10:30PM local
Flights must remain in one time zone
Earliest 6AM departure time.
Minimum 7.5 hours credit per SDT.
Minimum two days preceding, and following a string of any SDP's.
SDT are limited to only SDT line holders, no hybrid lines.
Max string of 3 SDT's for line holders, maximum 2 for reserves- waivable at pilot's request.

I think those rules would leave you with 1400 min credit for the year, for a full load of CDO's monthly, without killing yourself in the process, and being home everyday.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-26-2014, 12:17 PM
  #1020  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,224
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Again with the litany of non sequiturs.

First of all, what "records"? Numerous airlines do SDP's (many with considerably less protections than we had in the TA that I didn't like, and WAY less protections than I'm advocating as a minimum) so where are these records that are supposedly settled law?

We live and work in a 24 hour world. We can't reverse engineer circadian babysitting of rogue pilots who shoot type A between their toes every chance they get trying to run side businesses and be super parent or whatever. Some pilots may like SDP's because they can work all day at home and fly on 1 hour of sleep or whatever. But guess what? Some pilots like long haul international for that exact same reason. Domestic trips with day sleeps and red eyes. Home by breakfast for a full day's work chopping firewood while day trading, then a quick little league double header before another evening report.

How about all those 5am reports we do? Do you really think every single pilot is fast asleep by 7 or 8PM getting uninterrupted full cycle REM restorative sleep every single time? Have you ever done a report that early and not gotten a full uninterrupted 8 hours? Did you call out fatigued? Every single time?

There is nothing in SDP's, if done reasonably, that is any less safe than a lot of flying every single 121 operator already does safely every single day.

If you are so opposed to them, and you somehow get one, and you are automatically going to call in fatigued in the morning no matter what, then do what you have to do. Safety first, and if you're not fit to fly then its what you must do.

But pulling the panic cord on something that a lot of pilots actually like and is in fact no less safe than many other operations we currently do doesn't do us any good. Funny thing is, SDP's would likely replace a lot of 30 hour layovers with early AM reports followed by long 4-5 leg days. Hope every single pilot gets to sleep by 7PM every single time, or those would also lead to tons of fatigue calls too, right? At least the duty day in question is 10 times longer with the same report time and likely on the same amount of actual sleep, so there's that.
Good post. Each pilot has a different tolerance for fatigue. The worst trips I have ever flown at Delta for fatigue were the 12 and 13 day pacific trips. I and most pilots I talk to are walking zombies after those.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices