Details on Delta TA
08-11-2014, 10:44 AM
#522
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by shiznit
Thanks for the emotional response, it really helps your case.
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Yeah, if it doesn't agree with what you think then it MUST be emotional. 
That trick is getting old, Shiz, and I don't think anyone who is objective is buying it.
That trick is getting old, Shiz, and I don't think anyone who is objective is buying it.
Originally Posted by shiznit
I keep forgetting that you are the objective one and those that don't agree with you are the emotional ones, thanks for the reminder.
Carl
08-11-2014, 11:19 AM
#523
No longer cares
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's ridiculous. I've never heard a single no voter say that. Not one. Mostly the reasons I've heard are: Didn't meet the contract survey, didn't believe the MEC admin's fear campaign, thought the company would come back with more if we sent it back, and it was too little before Section 6 even began.
Just like last time and not including our foreign JV competitors.
Carl
Just like last time and not including our foreign JV competitors.
Carl
08-11-2014, 11:41 AM
#524
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Carl...
How's the clubhouse coming along? Is that your newest fan? Is he cheering you along as you try to get that darn gopher that constantly out smarts you?
Last edited by johnso29; 08-11-2014 at 01:02 PM.
08-11-2014, 11:48 AM
#525
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
So in the world of tsquare, you're disqualified if you don't trust your reps? I think one of his reps is Nestor. How could anyone trust someone that blatantly political?
Carl
Carl
08-11-2014, 12:10 PM
#526
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's what the NC stated. That's not what my reps stated. That's the problem.
08-11-2014, 01:03 PM
#527
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by tsquare
The correct way to say this is that it didn't meet the responses that I put on MY survey. It didn't meet what I put on mine, and I will agree to that.
Originally Posted by tsquare
If you expect them to get everything that you put on the survey, you are a fool.
Originally Posted by tsquare
Or you just like being dishonest and divisive.
Carl
08-11-2014, 01:06 PM
#528
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
I tried to read everything being put out by all councils during the ratification period. I saw nothing that said that the NC did not follow the priorities section of the survey. In fact, I saw no mention of survey priorities at all -- only that that TA did not meet the direction given by the MEC.
Carl
08-11-2014, 02:25 PM
#529
At home on the maddog!
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
No, that's what tsquare says is correct. My reps simply said it did not even come close to the survey results. Be nice if they'd release the results so we could see for ourselves wouldn't it.
You're the only one saying that tsquare. Yet another straw man.
Hmmm, I'm either dishonest, divisive or a fool. You've always been such a persuasive debater tsquare.
Carl
You're the only one saying that tsquare. Yet another straw man.
Hmmm, I'm either dishonest, divisive or a fool. You've always been such a persuasive debater tsquare.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
