![]() |
Awesome!!
And what happens when we reject this TA? No concessions and increasing profit sharing. Management needs this deal much more than we do. Let's get a fair deal that is a win for the Delta pilots and Delta management. |
I have no dog in this fight as well but this seems like a BIIIIIIIGGGGGG POS! The sick leave policy scares the hell out of me. They are robbing Peter to pay Paul in the pay raise category. I really don't see any real gains in this TA. For all of you DAL pilots and the rest of us industry pukes please vote no.
|
The email needs to add to the LCA trip pull fiasco.
It won't just effect the pilots who attempt to bid with LCA, more importantly, it will effect EVERY FO on the list because an equal number of pilots who currently hold a line will now be on reserve as the amount of flying to award is reduced by 75% of the trips the LCA bid. How many LCA do we have total at Delta? Multiply that by .75 and you have the total number of FO's who currently hold lines who will be on reserve under C2015. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1904737)
The email needs to add to the LCA trip pull fiasco.
It won't just effect the pilots who attempt to bid with LCA, more importantly, it will effect EVERY FO on the list because an equal number of pilots who currently hold a line will now be on reserve as the amount of flying to award is reduced by 75% of the trips the LCA bid. How many LCA do we have total at Delta? Multiply that by .75 and you have the total number of FO's who currently hold lines who will be on reserve under C2015. From what I understand this is just the start. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1904743)
From what I understand this is just the start.
Scoop Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?
Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO. Slow, I agree 100% with you. The more objective and fact based the better for everyone. That is why I am so disappointed in the MEC. I have heard a few guys have said "We felt the Pilots should have a vote on this." Well that would be great if they presented both the good and the bad, let the No voters provide counterpoints at the road shows etc. In other words share information, answer questions, and stop selling it like a bunch of used car salesmen. I would have a lot more respect for DALPA if they just said something like: Here it is guys, it has some good thing, some bad things, vote what you think is best. Instead we get - This is awesome if you don't vote yes the evil NMB will come in the night and take your first born type of tactics. My 2 cents - Scoop OBTW - I voted yes open C2012 but will be voting NO shortly. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?
Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO. There is NO downside to keeping our EASK language! NONE! Stop trying to spin it as if we have to maintain a 50% ratio, that is a MINIMUM. Heck, we could fly 100% of our JV EASK! There is NOTHING that says we can -only- fly 50%, except Richard wants us to fly as little as possible, witness the JV Grievance we just WON! |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen?
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO.
Carl |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1904751)
If you guys want to be successful, tell your e-mail writers to ensure they stay fact based. Example: B737-900 ETOPS to Europe? Please. Also, if changing to block hours is a "land grab", what happens when Alitalia's EASK are pulled out of the JV next year versus what will happen under a block hour regimen? What happens as we add A330-300 to replace 7ER flying under the same premise?
Make sure they're prepared with facts as they grab the torches and pitchforks. JMO. |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 1904774)
Give us the facts here. Does switching to block hours put management back into compliance immediately?
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands