E195 pay rate
#2
That isn't the reason the TA failed though so why do you ask?
#3
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 264
Because it's my number one priority for TA2. I don't want my first upgrade to captain to be in something that pays less than the 717. Just curious how many other guys feel that this is number one.
#5
#6
Take the 717 rate and divide by number of seats... then apply that rate to the E195. After that then raise the rates in TA2 by the same amount. I will not vote yes for a B scale or any other concession in TA2.
Tail
Tail
#7
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,851
So if UAL still has not pulled the trigger on this deal what was the reason for the accelerated 30 day TA voting window?
Scoop
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,393
So a hypothetical 190 rate of $200/hr would be a B scale in your opinion if it paid less than the 717? Even though we already have 190 pay rates far, far less right this minute?
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,222
#10
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
C2012 -- $196 * (99/110=.9) = $177 (Actual $164.80)
RA15 --- $238.36 * .9 = 214.52 (Actual $200.13)
The rest of our pay rates do not chart per your formula. The 747 has three times the seating of the A319/737-700, three and a half times the 717 and almost 4 times the E190. Yet, nobody calls the 747 B Scale, even when it's 2011 rate was $174 an hour.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post