Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Lookie Here.... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/95334-lookie-here.html)

Dat jet 05-31-2016 08:30 AM

Lookie Here....
 
So Delta wants to start flying direct flights between PDX and London....and Delta also just announced that Virgin Atlantic will start flying the route, instead of Delta metal, between SEA and London

Delta Airlines To Offer Direct Flight From Portland To England In 2017 . News | OPB

I could see Delta making PDX a virtual base....have that business pick up...and end up giving that flying to Virgin. I could be wrong, but this looks like more ways we are are losing widebody flying. While United and AA fly 777-300s, and 787s....we'll still be flying 767-300ers....which ultimately the company doesn't want to replace, except maybe via Jkint Venture.

capncrunch 05-31-2016 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by Dat jet (Post 2137634)
So Delta wants to start flying direct flights between PDX and London....and Delta also just announced that Virgin Atlantic will start flying the route, instead of Delta metal, between SEA and London

Delta Airlines To Offer Direct Flight From Portland To England In 2017 . News | OPB

I could see Delta making PDX a virtual base....have that business pick up...and end up giving that flying to Virgin. I could be wrong, but this looks like more ways we are are losing widebody flying. While United and AA fly 777-300s, and 787s....we'll still be flying 767-300ers....which ultimately the company doesn't want to replace, except maybe via Jkint Venture.

At this point, if Delta pilots fly it, that'd be the shocker.

thinkstraight 05-31-2016 09:32 AM

Bang on old chap....

Dirtdiver 05-31-2016 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2137659)
At this point, if Delta pilots fly it, that'd be the shocker.

And if DAL did fly it, they'd DH the crews in from anywhere except SEA!

Trip7 05-31-2016 09:45 AM

There is a very good explanation of the current JV language along with Q&As in the latest C44 Roar. May help alleviate some of the heartburn felt from press releases like this.

Dreadnought 05-31-2016 09:57 AM

It's also nice that the picture is of a CRJ700 taking off.

capncrunch 05-31-2016 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by Dirtdiver (Post 2137667)
And if DAL did fly it, they'd DH the crews in from anywhere except SEA!

Haha yup. It'd be a DTW trip....in a 737-900. :eek:

WhatNow 05-31-2016 10:13 AM


Originally Posted by Trip7 (Post 2137668)
There is a very good explanation of the current JV language along with Q&As in the latest C44 Roar. May help alleviate some of the heartburn felt from press releases like this.

There was actually quite a bit more news with Virgin that was released at the same time as this change but omitted in the first post. Virgin will take over JFK-MAN and Delta will replace Virgin on one flight each out of DTW and ATL to LHR. We lose two flights and gain 3.

capncrunch 05-31-2016 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by WhatNow (Post 2137681)
There was actually quite a bit more news with Virgin that was released at the same time as this change but omitted in the first post. Virgin will take over JFK-MAN and Delta will replace Virgin on one flight each out of DTW and ATL to LHR. We lose two flights and gain 3.

So we gain 1 flight.

Reminds me of when sailingfun used to only talk about the AE positions and never the churn.

Dat jet 05-31-2016 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by WhatNow (Post 2137681)
There was actually quite a bit more news with Virgin that was released at the same time as this change but omitted in the first post. Virgin will take over JFK-MAN and Delta will replace Virgin on one flight each out of DTW and ATL to LHR. We lose two flights and gain 3.

It was omitted because the press release/article I put the link did not mention any such news...otherwise I would have included.

notEnuf 05-31-2016 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by WhatNow (Post 2137681)
There was actually quite a bit more news with Virgin that was released at the same time as this change but omitted in the first post. Virgin will take over JFK-MAN and Delta will replace Virgin on one flight each out of DTW and ATL to LHR. We lose two flights and gain 3.

So what you're saying is that Delta is making decisions for 2 airlines and operating 1.5 airlines. Or is it operating 2 airlines and profiting from 1.5, or is it revenue sharing for 2 airlines and owning 1.5 or is it... AHHHH! I'm so confused.

Whip, meet saw. Could we do this with 3 or 4 more airlines so we can make more profit(sharing).

Delta, Virgin Atlantic strengthen network between U.S.-U.K. | Delta News Hub

Delta runs it all really.

SCOPE

PRODUCTION BALANCE

BobZ 05-31-2016 12:46 PM

B-i-n-g-o.

scambo1 05-31-2016 01:54 PM


Originally Posted by notEnuf (Post 2137763)
So what you're saying is that Delta is making decisions for 2 airlines and operating 1.5 airlines. Or is it operating 2 airlines and profiting from 1.5, or is it revenue sharing for 2 airlines and owning 1.5 or is it... AHHHH! I'm so confused.

Whip, meet saw. Could we do this with 3 or 4 more airlines so we can make more profit(sharing).

Delta, Virgin Atlantic strengthen network between U.S.-U.K. | Delta News Hub

Delta runs it all really.

SCOPE

PRODUCTION BALANCE

Delta absolutely runs it all.




But, but, but Air France wouldnt draw down their flying...boo hoo.




Oh, okay, just $30M? Where do I sign.

Free Bird 05-31-2016 08:30 PM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 2137820)

But, but, but Air France wouldnt draw down their flying...boo hoo.

In other words, we the Delta pilots, entered into a legally binding agreement with Delta. And Delta says that they don't have the ability to comply with that agreement.

Is that not illegal? In writing they agreed to perform X amount of flying and then later claim a JV partner will not pull down flying. If that's the case then we need a contract with Air France instead of Delta since they can't comply.

Vincent Chase 06-01-2016 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2137688)
So we gain 1 flight.

Reminds me of when sailingfun used to only talk about the AE positions and never the churn.

I was starting to miss that guy. Then James came. And I thought Sailing was back. But he answered to people who called him T Square. So I guess I still miss Sailingfun.

TenYearsGone 06-01-2016 06:53 AM


Originally Posted by Vincent Chase (Post 2138150)
I was starting to miss that guy. Then James came. And I thought Sailing was back. But he answered to people who called him T Square. So I guess I still miss Sailingfun.

I guess they build credibility, NOT, by changing their stage name on a semi-anonomous board. So clever and sly!:D

TEN

forgot to bid 06-01-2016 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 2137820)
Delta absolutely runs it all.




But, but, but Air France wouldnt draw down their flying...boo hoo.




Oh, okay, just $30M? Where do I sign.

No worries, already signed for you.

capncrunch 06-01-2016 08:55 AM


Originally Posted by TenYearsGone (Post 2138157)
I guess they build credibility, NOT, by changing their stage name on a semi-anonomous board. So clever and sly!:D

TEN

The leopard may change his name but he can't change his spots.

capncrunch 06-01-2016 09:34 AM


Originally Posted by Free Bird (Post 2138005)
In other words, we the Delta pilots, entered into a legally binding agreement with Delta. And Delta says that they don't have the ability to comply with that agreement.

That's the funny thing, they also got into a legally binding agreement with Air France, but apparently it's ok for them to ignore the agreement. I guess Delta is just passing it along.

notEnuf 06-01-2016 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 2138248)
That's the funny thing, they also got into a legally binding agreement with Air France, but apparently it's ok for them to ignore the agreement. I guess Delta is just passing it along.

But, but...but...we are an investment grade company and we have integrity... and pride in our accomplishments....and we always keep our deals... But, but our former CEO said...I heard it with my own ears...But...but...

GBU-24 06-01-2016 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by WhatNow (Post 2137681)
There was actually quite a bit more news with Virgin that was released at the same time as this change but omitted in the first post. Virgin will take over JFK-MAN and Delta will replace Virgin on one flight each out of DTW and ATL to LHR. We lose two flights and gain 3.

But we are losing! Daily service vs 4 times a week. Losing daily out of a "hub"! DHing crews to PDX vs flying out of SEA base. Both legs should be Delta but if they had to give VA something, it should have been VA out of PDX, not the other way around.

Hank Kingsley 06-01-2016 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by GBU-24 (Post 2138452)
But we are losing! Daily service vs 4 times a week. Losing daily out of a "hub"! DHing crews to PDX vs flying out of SEA base. Both legs should be Delta but if they had to give VA something, it should have been VA out of PDX, not the other way around.

Let's show the math on this whole deal, I don't trust gain 3 lose 2.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands