Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Found This (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/98141-found.html)

boog123 11-03-2016 09:49 AM

Found This
 
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.

badflaps 11-03-2016 12:35 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.

Ya, but by now everybody has "We didn't think they'd do that" embroided on their pillow cases, right?

tomgoodman 11-03-2016 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by badflaps (Post 2237375)
Ya, but by now everybody has "We didn't think they'd do that" embroided on their pillow cases, right?

If they are married, yes. :D

hockeypilot44 11-03-2016 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.

What airline? Let's see it.

WhiskeyDelta 11-03-2016 05:06 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.

You can't just lob a grenade out here without something to back it up. Let's see your evidence.

Hank Kingsley 11-03-2016 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by boog123 (Post 2237268)
An old NN from a different airline stating that the NC didn't feel the changes to scope would result in a reduction of Mainline flying. Within weeks of the TA passing, mainline flying was reduced to the exact minimum of the TA.

How does that even remotely apply here? We have more protection than before.

boog123 11-04-2016 04:51 AM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 2237508)
What airline? Let's see it.

your old airline, March 2006

boog123 11-04-2016 04:52 AM


Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley (Post 2237580)
How does that even remotely apply here? We have more protection than before.

I don't feel protected, at all.

Harold Finch 11-04-2016 05:09 AM

Boog, then vote no. There are no assurances in life. This "sky is falling" mentality if we vote yes is incredible. You new guys and gals, I hear this doom and gloom every contract.

Hank Kingsley 11-04-2016 06:23 AM

No voting may be congenital.

hockeypilot44 11-04-2016 02:20 PM

I believe he is referring to the NWA bankruptcy contract that relaxed scope to start compass and resulted in the DC-9-10's getting parked.

boog123 11-04-2016 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 2238055)
I believe he is referring to the NWA bankruptcy contract that relaxed scope to start compass and resulted in the DC-9-10's getting parked.

DC-9-10's were already parked.

36 more DC-9's were announced parked within days of the EMB-175 order. A cute little jab from the CEO and his bunch during the time.

gloopy 11-05-2016 04:26 PM


Originally Posted by tomgoodman (Post 2237385)
If they are married, yes. :D

Then it would be "I didn't think they'd stop doing that" :D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands