The hits keep coming
#22
This ^^^ If you're planning to be in this profession for the long term, please, please, please understand this. My future career QOL depends on it. If you don't see whatever is "promised" in contract negotiation in writing in the contract you're currently voting on, it doesn't exist. "Promises" are made to get people to vote on a contract, if it's not in the black and white language of the deal, it's nothing.
As for the union not doing their job, I think they're doing exactly what we pay them to do. The Company doesn't give us anything for free, and we shouldn't be giving them things for free either. Dynamic training scheduling was a huge concession for this pilot group. The Company wants it, they think it will save them money so we should get something for that loss of QOL and for the money saved. So far, that something is 30% LCR. We're trading the QOL of trainees and instructors for increased QOL for reserves, I guess that's an OK trade. However, there are some unintended consequences of the dynamic scheduling, things like traveling on days off, sitting in MSP with no sims scheduled, scheduling more instructors than sims. We didn't know about those things when we signed the trial. Now we do, so we want those things fixed in plain language of the new LOA. So far, the Company hasn't agreed to fix those things. I think ultimately they will and the 30% LCR will come back unless they just don't see the value in this Dynamic Scheduling thing and they want to abandon it completely.
It sucks for April but in the long term if we go back to 15% for a few months to secure the language in the new LOA to protect this pilot group for the next X years, then I think it's worth it. I hope I'm in the majority on that.
As for the union not doing their job, I think they're doing exactly what we pay them to do. The Company doesn't give us anything for free, and we shouldn't be giving them things for free either. Dynamic training scheduling was a huge concession for this pilot group. The Company wants it, they think it will save them money so we should get something for that loss of QOL and for the money saved. So far, that something is 30% LCR. We're trading the QOL of trainees and instructors for increased QOL for reserves, I guess that's an OK trade. However, there are some unintended consequences of the dynamic scheduling, things like traveling on days off, sitting in MSP with no sims scheduled, scheduling more instructors than sims. We didn't know about those things when we signed the trial. Now we do, so we want those things fixed in plain language of the new LOA. So far, the Company hasn't agreed to fix those things. I think ultimately they will and the 30% LCR will come back unless they just don't see the value in this Dynamic Scheduling thing and they want to abandon it completely.
It sucks for April but in the long term if we go back to 15% for a few months to secure the language in the new LOA to protect this pilot group for the next X years, then I think it's worth it. I hope I'm in the majority on that.
#24
They're gonna need those pilots to staff their extra 25 planes for United, because they sure as hell aren't going to hire 200+ pilots OTS.
#26
Regional airline management making promises? Like "We're growing!"? Yeah because management always tells the truth! Whipsaw!!!
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,767
#28
Maybe that’s why everyone I know including myself got a postcard in the mail. Even my mainline friends got them. “You mean i could leave flying a Boeing to fly a crj for less than what I make now? Count me in”
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 507
I’m part of the 15% who voted NO. What part were you? I’m saying this was put out there to sway the vote. period! I’ve been here to long to buy into these promises.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 271
There is no promise if it isn't written down in a contract. The "Uber promise" you spoke of shouldn't even be part of this conversation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post