A220...Gamechanger?
#21
IIRC, that was one of the points (maybe the only positive point) that United tried to sell to passengers when they had Q400s in the mix.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
CAL put the Q400 on the BOS-EWR run for a while and bookings went down. That run is dominated by high revenue business travel. The flying public saw a turboprop as dangerous and they avoided it. They don’t understand that a modern turbofan engine is basically the same thing, but it’s all about perception. I rode on the Q400 several times. It is a nice cabin, but when you cruise in the mid 20’s, it can make for a rough ride. I hate the cramped 50 seat jets, but I’d rather cruise at FL330 than be down low in a nicer cabin getting kicked around. My guess is that the airlines just look different after this is over. Scope isn’t getting relaxed unless a bankruptcy judge does it, and the legacies will either adapt quickly during the recovery, or slowly as the 50 seat jets age out of the fleet.
#25
CAL put the Q400 on the BOS-EWR run for a while and bookings went down. That run is dominated by high revenue business travel. The flying public saw a turboprop as dangerous and they avoided it. They don’t understand that a modern turbofan engine is basically the same thing, but it’s all about perception. I rode on the Q400 several times. It is a nice cabin, but when you cruise in the mid 20’s, it can make for a rough ride. I hate the cramped 50 seat jets, but I’d rather cruise at FL330 than be down low in a nicer cabin getting kicked around. My guess is that the airlines just look different after this is over. Scope isn’t getting relaxed unless a bankruptcy judge does it, and the legacies will either adapt quickly during the recovery, or slowly as the 50 seat jets age out of the fleet.
It was the newest, most efficient airplane in the entire terminal, but they just saw it as an old pile of junk. People don’t want to fly on airplanes with spinny things on the wings.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post