Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
08-29-2019, 06:45 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CR9 CA, FT Minivan Driver
Posts: 452
Originally Posted by Meow1215
Doubtful, the 550 has unproven economics. Only a few of the routes the 200 does would have the need for a premium cabin. Also, 700s are not exactly plentiful.
08-29-2019, 07:37 AM
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by VoiceOfReason
Agreed. Pundits at DL in ATL I've heard from tell me the concept of the 550 is laughable. I firmly believe we will never see that abomination in DL livery.
08-29-2019, 07:51 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 998
Originally Posted by Meow1215
I’ll go do far as to say UA won’t keep it long term on all these routes. I could see routes where maybe it has its uses, the MVYs, ASPs, and such that have high value customers who will pay that kind of money on short flights. But your CSGs and SYRs that the 200 is known to do - not so much. Maybe UA will put it on longer thin routes and customers will justify it. But even then, it’s not a cash cow like the deuce.
08-29-2019, 02:15 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,186
Originally Posted by VoiceOfReason
Agreed. Pundits at DL in ATL I've heard from tell me the concept of the 550 is laughable. I firmly believe we will never see that abomination in DL livery.
08-29-2019, 02:31 PM
Porco Rosso
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Originally Posted by amcnd
Well you need to look at widebody count UA vs DL. Then even break it down further to premium seats On those widebodys vs DL. Way more seats. On UA that want premium from GSO-LHR then DL.. its a product difference. It probably wouldn’t work for DL. But time will tell if it works for UA...
Besides, if someone really wants GSO to Europe, then they're driving two hours to Charlotte and flying AA.
08-29-2019, 02:45 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,237
Originally Posted by Meow1215
I’ll go do far as to say UA won’t keep it long term on all these routes. I could see routes where maybe it has its uses, the MVYs, ASPs, and such that have high value customers who will pay that kind of money on short flights. But your CSGs and SYRs that the 200 is known to do - not so much. Maybe UA will put it on longer thin routes and customers will justify it. But even then, it’s not a cash cow like the deuce.
When DL 200’s can’t compete against UA 550’s their attitude may change.
08-29-2019, 06:25 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 309
Originally Posted by Blueskies21
Some guys wear it. Some guys don't. Each group has opinions on the other group, discussion ensues.
Did that clear it up?
Did that clear it up?
08-30-2019, 07:17 PM
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by Meow1215
Doubtful, the 550 has unproven economics. Only a few of the routes the 200 does would have the need for a premium cabin. Also, 700s are not exactly plentiful.
Then, *voilà!* they become 700's once again.
08-30-2019, 09:54 PM
On Guard!
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by Bloggs
The 550 doesn't exist for premium seating. It exists in order to keep large RJ's on United's property, waiting for the day that scope can be gutted.
Then, *voilà!* they become 700's once again.
Then, *voilà!* they become 700's once again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
