![]() |
DEC Base transfer times
So on the new handout advertising the direct entry captain program now at Envoy, they are stating reserve time in LGA will be less then 3 months. Also they are advertising base transfer times after training to ORD at 3 month, MIA 6 months, and DFW 12 months.
Curious if you all think this is possible or not. Supposedly these numbers are backed up by data at the moment. |
|
Originally Posted by skytrails
(Post 2543594)
So on the new handout advertising the direct entry captain program now at Envoy, they are stating reserve time in LGA will be less then 3 months. Also they are advertising base transfer times after training to ORD at 3 month, MIA 6 months, and DFW 12 months.
Curious if you all think this is possible or not. Supposedly these numbers are backed up by data at the moment. |
DEC Base transfer times
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2543874)
Reserve in LGA will be a lot longer than 3 months and base transfer to DFW will be a lot longer than 12 months. Pretty sure on those two unless something drastic changes. I’m less familiar with ORD and MIA but I’d be willing bet that those two numbers are outright lies too.
If the projections of 130 lines by may is accurate. The calculation for reserve is probably not as far off as you might think. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by skytrails
(Post 2543594)
So on the new handout advertising the direct entry captain program now at Envoy, they are stating reserve time in LGA will be less then 3 months. Also they are advertising base transfer times after training to ORD at 3 month, MIA 6 months, and DFW 12 months.
Curious if you all think this is possible or not. Supposedly these numbers are backed up by data at the moment. |
I just had another look at the seniority numbers in DECS for each seat in each base. I don’t know what the date of hire is for those seniority numbers but I can say I was hired well over 12 months ago and make some comparisons. I’m not senior enough to hold CA MIA, CA ORD, or CA DFW. I am senior enough to hold CA LGA. Now, I understand that things change such that things that have happend or are happening now don’t always correlate directly to what is going to happen BUT given the large number of FOs hired over the last couple years will be reaching upgrade qualifications soon AND they will be senior to the direct entry captains, that it’s far more likely that seniority will play out worse for these direct entry captains than it would for me. THAT’s why I say something drastic needs to happen for those projections to be right.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2543894)
I just had another look at the seniority numbers in DECS for each seat in each base. I don’t know what the date of hire is for those seniority numbers but I can say I was hired well over 12 months ago and make some comparisons. I’m not senior enough to hold CA MIA, CA ORD, or CA DFW. I am senior enough to hold CA LGA. Now, I understand that things change such that things that have happend or are happening now don’t always correlate directly to what is going to happen BUT given the large number of FOs hired over the last couple years will be reaching upgrade qualifications soon AND they will be senior to the direct entry captains, that it’s far more likely that seniority will play out worse for these direct entry captains than it would for me. THAT’s why I say something drastic needs to happen for those projections to be right.
I really don't see anyone holding DFW as a DEC for more than two years. We had so many older guys coming here just to get DFW 175 and once they get the upgrade then they will be pushing for a DFW base. Unfortunately I see people getting DFW and then getting kicked out of DFW just like it has happened this last vacancy. |
I have heard of Fall of 17 hires getting ORD captain. So I buy the 3 month base transfer after training at the moment.
I’m curious though how the 16 and 17 new hires upgrading will change things. Or if there will be enough attrition off the top to make up for it. |
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
(Post 2543946)
Three months to hold a line in LGA may be a bit of a stretch. I'd guess it's more likely to range from three to six months.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2544042)
Forgot to mention that it looks like I’d still be on reserve if I was a CA in LGA right now when I look at the reseve list (perhaps the guys senior to me are bidding reserve on purpose but I don’t think so). Only way I see the direct entry captains coming off reserve in less than a year would be if there really is this sudden expansion to the number of lines in LGA such that there are more lines (or nearly more lines) than CAs there (it happened to FOs in ORD last summer so it’s possible) or perhaps a new base opening that creates the same situation. But even that would be temporary. The direct entry captains will need captains junior to them to really move off reserve and base transfer. The vast majority of the new captains over the next 2 years will be senior to them.
|
Originally Posted by Whiskey4
(Post 2544060)
True. But, in regards to LGA line holding, the vast majority are also not planning to stay in NY.
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2544101)
They’ll gain seniorty due to other direct entry captain hires after them but movement will be much slower than it has been or will be for the rest of us for approximately the next 2 years.
The folks I know considering this are stagnating at their current shop (I even know pilots at corporate/fractionals that many here might like to work for seriously considering this deal since they have been there 10+ years and won’t hold captain for awhile due to the lack of mandatory retirement). They are unhappy at their current carrier (I know an Endeavor guy considering the Envoy DEC position). These people generally aren’t stupid, or have no idea what they are getting in to. It makes sense for them and their family to make this change. Whether it’s money, flow, left seat, whatever... |
Originally Posted by Whiskey4
(Post 2544121)
Well...yeah. That’s part of the equation when taking a DEC position at any airline in the world. It just seems odd posting warnings about something that is inherently built into the position these folks are accepting. Are you worried that they might think their seniority progression will be rapid for the first couple of years??
The folks I know considering this are stagnating at their current shop (I even know pilots at corporate/fractionals that many here might like to work for seriously considering this deal since they have been there 10+ years and won’t hold captain for awhile due to the lack of mandatory retirement). They are unhappy at their current carrier (I know an Endeavor guy considering the Envoy DEC position). These people generally aren’t stupid, or have no idea what they are getting in to. It makes sense for them and their family to make this change. Whether it’s money, flow, left seat, whatever... |
I think the better question is how many DEC are they going to hire?? If they stop hiring DEC this would be the worse place to be. If they are planning to continue and hire DEC life wouldn’t be so bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
The current base and line hold times aren't going to be a predictor for NHs. Attrition, NHs, and number/quality of lines are the main factors that will determine ones progression.
|
The other question is will there be anymore forced upgrades in next 3-6 months as guys hired 2 yrs ago get their time. I don’t see many more dec in the future.
|
Originally Posted by Bigpimppilot
(Post 2544172)
The other question is will there be anymore forced upgrades in next 3-6 months as guys hired 2 yrs ago get their time. I don’t see many more dec in the future.
The company is in full force right now looking for HVA. My class of forced upgrades 5 guys have since quit. Come may, I have 30 captains below me on the reserve list. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Bigpimppilot
(Post 2544172)
The other question is will there be anymore forced upgrades in next 3-6 months as guys hired 2 yrs ago get their time. I don’t see many more dec in the future.
For example in my previous stint at Eagle it took me 3 years and 3 months on property to fly 1,000 hours. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2544183)
That’s not what the company is saying. They are saying they need 300 DEC’s or else they are in big trouble. My understanding is the majority of the 17 new hires are flying very very little thus most of them are nowhere close to hitting 1,000 hours.
For example in my previous stint at Eagle it took me 3 years and 3 months on property to fly 1,000 hours. I flew with an FO the other day who was a DEC16 hire he only has 400 hours with the company. Not sure if he purposely didn’t want to fly or if that’s just how the cookie crumbled. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
(Post 2544181)
The company is in full force right now looking for HVA. My class of forced upgrades 5 guys have since quit. Come may, I have 30 captains below me on the reserve list.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2544198)
They very well may be in full force for HVA right now but I don’t think they’ll need to for very long. I didn’t get to talk to those 5 guys you did but I’d bet their quitting had a lot to do with being forced into a situation they didn’t want. Once this wave pilots starts reaching qualifications AND seniority in their base and equipment of preference, DECs will no longer be necessary or desired.
Primarily the bate and switch.. (not to mention the reduce in bonus and no per diem in training since we were based in DFW) we were all hired into DFW then forced to go to LGA. I personally wouldn’t have came here knowing I was going to get instantly displaced to LGA Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2544183)
That’s not what the company is saying. They are saying they need 300 DEC’s or else they are in big trouble. My understanding is the majority of the 17 new hires are flying very very little thus most of them are nowhere close to hitting 1,000 hours.
For example in my previous stint at Eagle it took me 3 years and 3 months on property to fly 1,000 hours. |
Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
(Post 2544201)
Primarily the bate and switch.. (not to mention the reduce in bonus and no per diem in training since we were based in DFW) we were all hired into DFW then forced to go to LGA. I personally wouldn’t have came here knowing I was going to get instantly displaced to LGA
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
This is true^
So on this last class with the 4 forced ca slots, do those guys incur a training freeze? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
(Post 2543878)
If the projections of 130 lines by may is accurate. The calculation for reserve is probably not as far off as you might think.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Seaplane
(Post 2544286)
Has there been an accurate projection yet?
Only projection is what we were told by the union in the last base visit.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Sheg0theD
(Post 2544185)
I flew with an FO the other day who was a DEC16 hire he only has 400 hours with the company.
Not sure if he purposely didn’t want to fly or if that’s just how the cookie crumbled. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk In ORD at least, if you wanted to max out hours you'd be closer to 650 for a late 16/early 17 hire. |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2544198)
They very well may be in full force for HVA right now but I don’t think they’ll need to for very long. I didn’t get to talk to those 5 guys you did but I’d bet their quitting had a lot to do with being forced into a situation they didn’t want. Once this wave pilots starts reaching qualifications AND seniority in their base and equipment of preference, DECs will no longer be necessary or desired.
Soon the DEC song will stop playing and the bottom guy is going to be hurting. |
Originally Posted by ENH017
(Post 2544292)
Was hired around the same time, have roughly 100 more hours. I was trying to max out OT until the combination of no critical coverage and impending forced upgrade brought that to complete halt.
In ORD at least, if you wanted to max out hours you'd be closer to 650 for a late 16/early 17 hire. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2544183)
That’s not what the company is saying. They are saying they need 300 DEC’s or else they are in big trouble. My understanding is the majority of the 17 new hires are flying very very little thus most of them are nowhere close to hitting 1,000 hours.
For example in my previous stint at Eagle it took me 3 years and 3 months on property to fly 1,000 hours. |
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2544345)
Just to be clear, they don't need that many to avoid being "in big trouble." They don't need that many to maintain the current operation. That's more of a figure to achieve their goals of growth and expanding into other parts of the country and opening/reopening bases. Plus, you've got the very beginning of the big wave of 2016 new hires approaching 1,000 hours. Sky is definitely not falling. They may not be able to expand and grow back to 3,000 pilots as quickly as they'd like, but I don't think any of us could care less.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2544389)
How many FO’s are upgrading a month?
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2544345)
Just to be clear, they don't need that many to avoid being "in big trouble." They don't need that many to maintain the current operation. That's more of a figure to achieve their goals of growth and expanding into other parts of the country and opening/reopening bases. Plus, you've got the very beginning of the big wave of 2016 new hires approaching 1,000 hours. Sky is definitely not falling. They may not be able to expand and grow back to 3,000 pilots as quickly as they'd like, but I don't think any of us could care less.
If they promised AAG that we would cover this flying/growth/base expansion, then some lucky manager will have the pleasure of telling AA that we failed and can’t make it happen. The number one rule of business: Never overpromise and under-deliver (especially not will major $$$ on the line). That type of stuff can be a career killer. |
Was it 2011 when American said Envoy was going to hire 800 pilots? Didn’t they only hire 400 or so? Did they say 800 so that they wouldn’t have an issue getting 400? Is it possible that if the company says they desperately need 200 dec Pilots then they really only need say half?
|
Originally Posted by Bigpimppilot
(Post 2544698)
Was it 2011 when American said Envoy was going to hire 800 pilots? Didn’t they only hire 400 or so? Did they say 800 so that they wouldn’t have an issue getting 400? Is it possible that if the company says they desperately need 200 dec Pilots then they really only need say half?
|
Nov. 29 AMR declared. Not Envoy.
https://turnaround.org/cmaextras/Carl-Marks-Competition-American-Airlines.pdf |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands