Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy 2019

Old 01-10-2019, 02:04 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,649
Default

Originally Posted by LineUpAndPay View Post
I mean they could say that every single year. But what they actually get, we shall see. I personally truly hope they do. But I'm getting worried as we start falling behind in pay. As of the last NewsBlast on 12/7, we had a net gain for the year of 126 pilots, which is great. It means of the 638 hired in that list we had a lot of movement. I just hope we can stay on course and the well of RTP/Cadet guys isn't drying up while everyone else who hasn't signed a contract goes to other carriers with higher pay. At some point I feel like that well is going to dry, and I'm hoping it's not 2019.
It’s an easy solution if it does dry up. Once it does they will simply give us the pay rates to match our competitors and people will come back.
Cyio is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 02:14 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by Naviator View Post
What about the 10 eligible FOs that did not upgrade this time?
Oh, do tell. I’m not saying you’re wrong but, if true, this would be the first bid in over a year where there were eligible FOs that were not forced to upgrade.

IF that did happen, that implies there were some that had an empty 3P (at least as regards to captain) that didn’t proffer to displace, and were fairly senior since they weren’t displaced and there were MANY that were.

This is important info really. If there were FOs that were forcefully upgraded that were senior to those NOT upgraded, the union needs to know.
highfarfast is online now  
Old 01-10-2019, 02:56 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
Oh, do tell. I’m not saying you’re wrong but, if true, this would be the first bid in over a year where there were eligible FOs that were not forced to upgrade.

IF that did happen, that implies there were some that had an empty 3P (at least as regards to captain) that didn’t proffer to displace, and were fairly senior since they weren’t displaced and there were MANY that were.

This is important info really. If there were FOs that were forcefully upgraded that were senior to those NOT upgraded, the union needs to know.
Don’t want to throw out any names, but we can all do the math. Anyone with a seniority list, the upgrade list, and FOS access can find FOs with more than 1000 hours company time that did not upgrade. And, yes, they are all senior to the highest seniority DISP/NEB. I’m guessing that means empty 3P and empty 3D.
Naviator is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 03:03 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,649
Default

Originally Posted by Naviator View Post
Don’t want to throw out any names, but we can all do the math. Anyone with a seniority list, the upgrade list, and FOS access can find FOs with more than 1000 hours company time that did not upgrade. And, yes, they are all senior to the highest seniority DISP/NEB. I’m guessing that means empty 3P and empty 3D.
The vacancy isn’t over yet is it? Perhaps they are working on these individuals right now. Hopefully not sending to LGA.
Cyio is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 04:10 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,465
Default

Originally Posted by Naviator View Post
Don’t want to throw out any names, but we can all do the math. Anyone with a seniority list, the upgrade list, and FOS access can find FOs with more than 1000 hours company time that did not upgrade. And, yes, they are all senior to the highest seniority DISP/NEB. I’m guessing that means empty 3P and empty 3D.
I don’t know how to look up other’s flight experience. So please show me how. I do know there are others senior to me with less time though.
highfarfast is online now  
Old 01-10-2019, 04:51 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio View Post
The vacancy isn’t over yet is it? Perhaps they are working on these individuals right now. Hopefully not sending to LGA.
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I do know that displacements go from bottom up. So if the company ran all of the preference bids, and had vacancies left over to fill; they would start displacing eligible FO's from the bottom of the seniority list up. Those eligible FO's that didn't get displaced to CA likely didn't have anything in thier 3P & 3D, and were senior enough to dodge the displacement.
griff312 is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 05:12 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,054
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast View Post
I don’t know how to look up other’s flight experience. So please show me how. I do know there are others senior to me with less time though.
7V/123456

Filler
BigZ is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 07:50 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by BigZ View Post
7V/123456

Filler
I'm very surprised I've never seen this one before, very useful these days with the forced upgrades and such.
ENH017 is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 09:54 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 490
Default

Originally Posted by griff312 View Post
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I do know that displacements go from bottom up. So if the company ran all of the preference bids, and had vacancies left over to fill; they would start displacing eligible FO's from the bottom of the seniority list up. Those eligible FO's that didn't get displaced to CA likely didn't have anything in thier 3P & 3D, and were senior enough to dodge the displacement.
You were correct until the end there. IF someone lucked out, it wasn't because they had a blank 3D. It'd be because the company had more upgrade-able FOs than they did open CA vacancies. They filled all the vacancies so there was no need to keep displacing.
boiler07 is offline  
Old 01-10-2019, 11:31 PM
  #160  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 92
Default

7V only shows flight time for the last year. Many of the first officers who weren't displaced have very low annual flight time. A pilot hired in 2014 that only flies a few hundred hours a year due to union work, mil leave, medical ect. could still be below the 950 hour mark.

Also, there are a number of first officers senior to the most senior FO displaced to CA on this bid that were previously awarded/displaced into CA slots but have not gone to training yet.

Finally, with the standing vacancy there's a chance that the company is intentionally leaving CA slots unfilled. As an example let's say 100 CA slots for a position are posted in a bid. The company wants at least 80. Only 50 people bid for it so the company displaces another 30 to get their 80 and leaves 20 for the standing vacancy. I have no idea if this is contractually legal or not but if the company is doing this it would at least be nice of them to let us know what the minimum number they're looking for is.
KodiakRS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ag386
Envoy Airlines
96
07-11-2019 06:15 AM
diva
Regional
15
05-27-2017 07:14 AM
Romulus
Envoy Airlines
15
10-14-2014 06:34 PM
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
553
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
AllisonRR
Envoy Airlines
45
10-07-2014 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices