![]() |
Piedmont cadet considering Envoy instead.
First time posting. I've read through many threads in the Envoy and Pidemont sections and need some advice between the two airlines.
I've already interviewed with and been hired by Piedmont, and I'm receiving cadet instructor checks from Piedmont and am able to repay them. I've not yet reached my ATP minimums, though I'm very close, and have not been assigned an ATP CTP date. My concern with Piedmont is their seemingly low QOL with poor scheduling (4 on 2 off regardless of seniority) and little to no flexibility. I'm considering Envoy instead and would like to know if you Envoy pilot's feel like you have a better QOL than Piedmont. Should I consider interviewing with Envoy instead or is it just different flavors of the WO family with the same problems. Has anyone done this and am I setting myself up for being blacklisted by the WO's and AA if I bail on Piedmont. Thanks in advance. |
Can you drive to work at either?
|
Yes, I intend to move to base for any domicile I’m assigned.
|
We have little flexibility also but it sounds like marginally better schedules - usually 4 on 3 off. From what I understand, AA does not care whether you jump around provided you haven’t started there generating a PRIA hit, however, you will be asked to leave before your tech interview if Envoy finds out you’ve accepted an offer from Piedmont or PSA.
To me the QOL pick is Piedmont between the two. Lots of paid time off in training and pretty liveable jr FO base (CLT) compared to ORD or god forbid NYC but it has been awhile since I researched options thoroughly so ymmv. There are other reasons to consider Envoy if you think you are likely to get hired off the street because if (and only if) you get the 175 you’ll upgrade and get valuable TPIC sooner potentially but you said QOL. |
Originally Posted by Mockstew
(Post 2780350)
Yes, I intend to move to base for any domicile I’m assigned.
|
Originally Posted by Mockstew
(Post 2780326)
First time posting. I've read through many threads in the Envoy and Pidemont sections and need some advice between the two airlines.
I've already interviewed with and been hired by Piedmont, and I'm receiving cadet instructor checks from Piedmont and am able to repay them. I've not yet reached my ATP minimums, though I'm very close, and have not been assigned an ATP CTP date. My concern with Piedmont is their seemingly low QOL with poor scheduling (4 on 2 off regardless of seniority) and little to no flexibility. I'm considering Envoy instead and would like to know if you Envoy pilot's feel like you have a better QOL than Piedmont. Should I consider interviewing with Envoy instead or is it just different flavors of the WO family with the same problems. Has anyone done this and am I setting myself up for being blacklisted by the WO's and AA if I bail on Piedmont. Thanks in advance. Biggest difference is Envoy is taking brand new planes, Piedmont has taken all the planes it’s supposed to get from Envoy. Piedmont is currently not upgrading FOs to Captain and Envoy is. When Piedmont does open up upgrades again it’s taking folks 30-36 months from day one of indoc until they have enough hours to upgrade. The future is brighter at Envoy currently. |
You'll probably end up being an Envoy pilot either way
|
Thanks for your responses everyone, I appreciate the input.
|
I’ve posted on your other thread before I found this one.
Seems to me you’re worrying about the color of the sky next week. You haven’t started yet, don’t know what you like to dislike in a Professional career and you’re already considering bouncing because of what....exactly? Opinions of random people on the internet? Like mine? Stick with it and be grateful for the opportunity and don’t look at Tuesday’s off vs Wednesday’s off. That’s pointless. Instead work your ass off the next 2-3 years. Then take a breather and reevaluate. |
Thanks for the input, it's because I've already had an aviation job with a terrible schedule that required night after night of hotel stays, and little scheduling flexibility. It's the scheduling flexibility that's a killer for me. Unfortunately what the recruiters say and what pilot's say conflict when it comes to scheduling at Piedmont. That's why I'm asking here.
|
Originally Posted by Mockstew
(Post 2781362)
Thanks for the input, it's because I've already had an aviation job with a terrible schedule that required night after night of hotel stays, and little scheduling flexibility. It's the scheduling flexibility that's a killer for me. Unfortunately what the recruiters say and what pilot's say conflict when it comes to scheduling at Piedmont. That's why I'm asking here.
They will simply tell you not enough resources even though there are 25 sitting reserve that day. You can have some luck trading stuff but again, don’t expect help from the company in this regard. Crew scheduling is most certainly antagonistic towards the pilots. |
No idea about Piedmont, but at Envoy the ability to trade comes with holding a line. Don’t expect to be able to trade reserve days, and even if you have a line, trades can be difficult and limited to what is available that has been deemed “more critical” to cover than what you want to get out of. There have been times that despite trips being available, I could not trade out of what I already had.
|
Originally Posted by TiredSoul
(Post 2781344)
I’ve posted on your other thread before I found this one.
Seems to me you’re worrying about the color of the sky next week. You haven’t started yet, don’t know what you like to dislike in a Professional career and you’re already considering bouncing because of what....exactly? Opinions of random people on the internet? Like mine? Stick with it and be grateful for the opportunity and don’t look at Tuesday’s off vs Wednesday’s off. That’s pointless. Instead work your ass off the next 2-3 years. Then take a breather and reevaluate. When you’re a year or two out from flow like some of us the busting your ass for 2 more years doesn’t sound too bad. When you’re 9+ years out, it sounds aweful. |
2-3 years is what it should take to upgrade no?
That’s what I was hinting at. Work your ass off for your upgrade then sit back and decide where to go from there. Or stay. Maybe. |
The best QOL at any of the AA WOs is a line-holder at PSA. You can credit 100+ hours with 12-13 days off or drop down to 65 hours and 17-19 days off. That being said you’ll be on reserve a very long time at PSA as almost half of our entire pilot group is on reserve.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2782143)
The best QOL at any of the AA WOs is a line-holder at PSA. You can credit 100+ hours with 12-13 days off or drop down to 65 hours and 17-19 days off. That being said you’ll be on reserve a very long time at PSA as almost half of our entire pilot group is on reserve.
|
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 2782224)
That’s a little misleading as only a very small sample size would achieve the numbers you state. Plus you hear about everyone having issues with SAP lately.
The thing with PSA is that the disparity between reserve and a Round 1 lineholder is pretty stark. Reserve here isn’t great. But it isn’t great anywhere at a regional. But once you can hold a line the quality of life here improves dramatically. I’m not trying to convince the OP to come to PSA. Like I said, they will likely experience a very long time on reserve here right now. |
Reserve is interesting. Living in base bidding reserve, trying not to fly as a 145 FO here at Envoy would be very similar to getting paid and receiving benefits to literally do nothing after the first few months. You could easily get another (flexible) job, or go back to school and knock out a BA. We do not have an effective reserve time balancing system.
Whole new world of QOL for those inclined to do that - but few are. |
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2782353)
Reserve is interesting. Living in base bidding reserve, trying not to fly as a 145 FO here at Envoy would be very similar to getting paid and receiving benefits to literally do nothing after the first few months. You could easily get another (flexible) job, or go back to school and knock out a BA. We do not have an effective reserve time balancing system.
Whole new world of QOL for those inclined to do that - but few are. |
Originally Posted by inevitableneb
(Post 2782669)
That's really not possible anymore even for senior FOs. Things are balancing out
I've never seen them actually fly off RAP. They seem to be almost hitting 100 hours a year. |
Originally Posted by inevitableneb
(Post 2782669)
That's really not possible anymore even for senior FOs. Things are balancing out
|
Originally Posted by inevitableneb
(Post 2782669)
That's really not possible anymore even for senior FOs. Things are balancing out
|
Go to #SkyBest
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands