Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
History of the Airline for the New Guys >

History of the Airline for the New Guys

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

History of the Airline for the New Guys

Old 07-14-2019, 12:39 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by 272922 View Post
Never said Envoy had a gun to our head. AAG on the other hand.....

Oh, and thank you for making my point for me. As I said earlier, PSA made a begrudging strategic retreat, as has reaped the gains every step of the way.

And by the way, Envoy never owned any of that flying. No regional ever has.



Yeah, that's it, AAG would've come to their senses and just given everyone current PSA pay rates in 2013 had only one of the smallest carriers at the time given them the middle finger so that Envoy pilots could feel better about themselves. Riiiiiight……..

Oh, and there's that Envoy entitlement there on full display. News Flash for those that haven't gotten the memo yet, you work for a freaking regional that doesn't own any flying. Not AA, which actually does own the flying. Shocker I know.
He doesn't work at envoy.
MEGAFUPM is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 01:47 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,649
Default

Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM View Post
He doesn't work at envoy.
No he doesn’t anymore but is perhaps the most well versed person in terms of that period of time. The same people working for managment are still working there so insight into it is valuable.

I got one always get something from Cujo’s posts.
Cyio is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 02:13 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by 272922 View Post
Never said Envoy had a gun to our head. AAG on the other hand.....
Never said Envoy had a gun to your head. You said AAG had a gun to your head threatening you. Got news pal. EVERY regional management everywhere threatens their pilot group during negotiations. If you continue to roll over your entire career you are of no use to anybody and do not understand trade unionism.

Point of fact, when AAG did finally get their second pound of flesh; they were back within 3 months adding LOA after LOA to restore what they’d taken, and more. Why? Because they couldn’t fill their seats. Which is exactly what we told them would happen.

Closing MIA and NY were mistakesback then that we told the replacement vendors couldn’t staff. We Told them we’d be back in NY within a year. It was a year and one month later when it reopened. The Envoy MEC has been much more accurate at seeing the direction the industry would go than any of the managers. They’re still better at it than AAG.

Another post suggested a friendlier more trusting approach with management. I’d just like to ask how many times that your lied to directly to your face by CEO or VP’s does it take before you trust only what they actually do, not what they say? Every time we trusted them since 1994 we got screwed. Go ask some really senior guys who’ve been there a while the full history of AMR-AAG. At Envoy, it’s still very much an AMR style operation.

Last edited by Cujo665; 07-14-2019 at 02:23 PM.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 02:39 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
Never said Envoy had a gun to your head. You said AAG had a gun to your head threatening you.
Fair point.

Got news pal. EVERY regional management everywhere threatens their pilot group during negotiations. If you continue to roll over your entire career you are of no use to anybody and do not understand trade unionism.

Point of fact, when AAG did finally get their second pound of flesh; they were back within 3 months adding LOA after LOA to restore what they’d taken, and more. Why? Because they couldn’t fill their seats. Which is exactly what we told them would happen.

Closing MIA and NY were mistakesback then that we told the replacement vendors couldn’t staff. We Told them we’d be back in NY within a year. It was a year and one month later when it reopened. The Envoy MEC has been much more accurate at seeing the direction the industry would go than any of the managers. They’re still better at it than AAG.
If the Envoy MEC is so good at seeing the direction of the industry, explain the current state of affair vis a vis PSA and Envoy. Seems like they haven't been able to leverage that insight into anything but "I told you so!!!!!" Meanwhile my seniority keeps climbing about as fast as my pay rate.....

Again, strategic retreat.

Another post suggested a friendlier more trusting approach with management. I’d just like to ask how many times that your lied to directly to your face by CEO or VP’s does it take before you trust only what they actually do, not what they say? Every time we trusted them since 1994 we got screwed. Go ask some really senior guys who’ve been there a while the full history of AMR-AAG. At Envoy, it’s still very much an AMR style operation.
I said "good relationship." How we got there was the PSA MEC passing a No Confidence Resolution in senior management that resulted in our DO being sent back to PDT and our VP of Flight Ops being "retired," and ultimately gaining a new VP whom I've been told the TSA pilot group would love to have back.
272922 is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 02:45 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by 272922 View Post
Fair point.



If the Envoy MEC is so good at seeing the direction of the industry, explain the current state of affair vis a vis PSA and Envoy. Seems like they haven't been able to leverage that insight into anything but "I told you so!!!!!" Meanwhile my seniority keeps climbing about as fast as my pay rate.....

Again, strategic retreat.



I said "good relationship." How we got there was the PSA MEC passing a No Confidence Resolution in senior management that resulted in our DO being sent back to PDT and our VP of Flight Ops being "retired," and ultimately gaining a new VP whom I've been told the TSA pilot group would love to have back.
Like I said, Envoy is not a USAir leftover management team; it’s an AMR leftover management team. Our very first MEC meeting with the new CEO (Pedro Fabregas) the ENTIRE and I mean Entire MEC which included the training center pro management guys all told Pedro that if Winkley ever left he could not replace him with Wilson. It would lead to disaster. We also candidly told him of the other AMR leftovers who had no vision to build a team and instead only understand how to use a stick or whip. He said he understood.
He promoted Wilson to VP of Flight Ops and every manager we identified as an obstructionist to collaborative team building was not only retained, but promoted.

Please don’t think your PSA leaders are anything like Envoys. Yours apparently have at least some basic ethics.

Last edited by Cujo665; 07-14-2019 at 03:02 PM.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 03:48 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD-11Loader's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pawn
Posts: 1,138
Default

Originally Posted by DoNoHarm View Post
This. This above is the Envoy mentality, and the reason that Envoy is the way that it is right now. The gains would not have happened in 2013 and PSA would have been shut down. You take as much as you can, when you can, and move on to fight again.

Envoy pilots did not take the free money that was being given out a couple months ago...how has that worked out for them? Did they win?
The “free money” that was being passed out left 60% of our captains paid less $7/he than a PSA captain flying the same size airplane. That’s simply unacceptable. They can keep their charity gift. I am not going to settle for less total compensation than the usurpers in DAY got.
MD-11Loader is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 04:00 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,649
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
The “free money” that was being passed out left 60% of our captains paid less $7/he than a PSA captain flying the same size airplane. That’s simply unacceptable. They can keep their charity gift. I am not going to settle for less total compensation than the usurpers in DAY got.
It amazes me, even after it being explained, that people can’t understand this point. It wasn’t simply an even deal with psa and is. It would have left us earning less than our peers.
Cyio is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 07:23 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Default

Originally Posted by Urban achiever View Post
Awesome write up, and explains the hatred of envoy vs psa. Yikes... with that being said, all those that voted yes to the 900s that were at PSA in 2013 are no longer there.

Disclaimer: the following is from memory and what has been told to me by a former chief pilot and union members that have already flowed to AA, and friends that were at PSA prior to 2013.

The merger of AA/USAIR was being held up by PSA. Initially they did refuse, but were warned that if they refused the planes they would be liquidated, and the 600 pilots at the time would be without jobs in a months time. They were faced with a choice. Accept concessions, get planes, and grow... or disappear. Maybe it was a bluff but more than 50% of the pilot group didn’t want to find out if they were bluffing just for a few extra $$$ when the planes meant immediate growth and movement.

Now I’m sure there’s plenty more to the story but hopefully this fills in some gaps from the other side. For what it’s worth, after the failed AIP, everyone at PSA is rooting for you guys.
I don’t know about everyone else but I have no qualms with the pilots that voted or couldn’t vote. I get the position they were in during the vote. My frustration is with the pilots that chose to go there after the vote and especially those that chose PSA when they announced Envoy’s planes were going to PSA. Those are the ones that undercut everyone and what makes whipsawwing the pilot group so destructive.
Pedro4President is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 07:44 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by Pedro4President View Post
I don’t know about everyone else but I have no qualms with the pilots that voted or couldn’t vote. I get the position they were in during the vote. My frustration is with the pilots that chose to go there after the vote and especially those that chose PSA when they announced Envoy’s planes were going to PSA. Those are the ones that undercut everyone and what makes whipsawwing the pilot group so destructive.
Yeah, all those pilots 2014 / 2015 hires that had quick rise to a line with a really flexible schedule, making the same amount of money, and now making a LOT more money.....

So destructive...….
272922 is offline  
Old 07-14-2019, 07:44 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by E190 Driver View Post
Do you even know what a B scale is?
Sure do. Do you?
272922 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
95wahoo
JetBlue
61
01-21-2019 11:28 AM
PeezDog
Hangar Talk
53
07-10-2010 07:17 AM
joel payne
Major
78
03-24-2009 06:34 PM
LarianLeQuella
Hangar Talk
1
06-07-2007 12:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices