![]() |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2880771)
My understanding is that they often code cancellations as Mx when in fact they may be other reasons. Like a lack of a crew to operate a flight. They do this to not spook their investors... allegedly.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2880819)
Envoy will be getting more 175s /growth. If Mesa exits the Eagle fold PSA alone won’t be able to cover all of that flying. I’d wager the bulk of it would be replaced by 175s in DFW and PSA would get the 16 American-owned CRJ900s.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2880918)
I seriously doubt Envoy could cover the other 44(?) aircraft Mesa operates right now. Maybe half, we just don't have enough captains.
And I would think that there are more improvements in both pay and contract in the horizon for the wholly owneds. As the industry continues to consolidate pilots will remain a commodity. AA knows this and will do what they have to to attract them to the WOs. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2880931)
I imagine SkyWest would likely get some of that as well. Specifically the PHX stuff.
And I would think that there are more improvements in both pay and contract in the horizon for the wholly owneds. As the industry continues to consolidate pilots will remain a commodity. AA knows this and will do what they have to to attract them to the WOs. And the “pay raises” were mostly a shell game of moving bonuses to pay. Still a positive but Envoy still lags in pay and just as importantly, QOL improvements. |
Originally Posted by pitchattitude
(Post 2880937)
One would think this to be the case, but there really hasn’t been any evidence of this. There has been some Eagle flying that has been consolidated. No more TSA and Wisconsin. The TSA 145s came back to Envoy, but I think they were passed over to PDT. There really has been minimal growth at Envoy in the past few years.
And the “pay raises” were mostly a shell game of moving bonuses to pay. Still a positive but Envoy still lags in pay and just as importantly, QOL improvements. |
I really don't think pay/qol enhancements are on the horizon. I think we shot our wad with the last deal. Too many guys in the pipeline that believe they'll flow in 6 years.:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2881045)
I really don't think pay/qol enhancements are on the horizon. I think we shot our wad with the last deal. Too many guys in the pipeline that believe they'll flow in 6 years.:rolleyes:
The big question for pilots wanting American is “are the AA recruiters telling the truth”. They say if you what to be AA, go to a WO. Envoy is syncing everything in training up with AA. Does that mean anything? Maybe not, but it could mean AA is going to use the WO as the minor leagues to get known quantities in their pipeline. If they know a WO pilot can make it through a program structured similar as theirs and the training cost and washouts are incurred at the WO instead of AA, that’s a huge money savings and honestly a novel concept. |
Originally Posted by AV8R72
(Post 2881117)
2016 guys will flow in 4.8 to 5.5 year then it goes up to around 9 for a current new hire, but that’s using low attrition. The big question is going to be how many CAs are hired off the street to AA or other majors. Looking at hiring needs between now and 2023 that could be as many, or more than flow each year. A person senior to you taking a job has the same effect on the flow.
The big question for pilots wanting American is “are the AA recruiters telling the truth”. They say if you what to be AA, go to a WO. Envoy is syncing everything in training up with AA. Does that mean anything? Maybe not, but it could mean AA is going to use the WO as the minor leagues to get known quantities in their pipeline. If they know a WO pilot can make it through a program structured similar as theirs and the training cost and washouts are incurred at the WO instead of AA, that’s a huge money savings and honestly a novel concept. AA recruiters say go to a WO because AA hires very little non-military outside of flow. If AA is the only place you'll be happy, yes, by all means, work for a WO. |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2881172)
Our non-flow attrition is very junior. I really wouldn't count on that to reduce your flow much.
AA recruiters say go to a WO because AA hires very little non-military outside of flow. If AA is the only place you'll be happy, yes, by all means, work for a WO. |
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2881172)
Our non-flow attrition is very junior. I really wouldn't count on that to reduce your flow much.
AA recruiters say go to a WO because AA hires very little non-military outside of flow. If AA is the only place you'll be happy, yes, by all means, work for a WO. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2881476)
Or work for a WO and apply everywhere else too...
|
Originally Posted by highfarfast
(Post 2881649)
Or go to a non WO with a better QOL and better pay, preferably with a domicile near you and apply everywhere
|
If I bail now prior to my 24 months contract for 45k bonus money, am I still liable to pay the prorated money back; as all the DECs are getting downgraded to FO?
:confused: Also the flow is 10 plus years and not 5.5 as advertised? |
Originally Posted by shinydiscoballs
(Post 3083593)
If I bail now prior to my 24 months contract for 45k bonus money, am I still liable to pay the prorated money back; as all the DECs are getting downgraded to FO?
:confused: Also the flow is 10 plus years and not 5.5 as advertised? |
Originally Posted by shinydiscoballs
(Post 3083593)
If I bail now prior to my 24 months contract for 45k bonus money, am I still liable to pay the prorated money back; as all the DECs are getting downgraded to FO?
:confused: Also the flow is 10 plus years and not 5.5 as advertised? |
Originally Posted by shinydiscoballs
(Post 3083593)
If I bail now prior to my 24 months contract for 45k bonus money, am I still liable to pay the prorated money back; as all the DECs are getting downgraded to FO?
:confused: Also the flow is 10 plus years and not 5.5 as advertised? |
Originally Posted by SilentLurker
(Post 2877331)
With the AIP Fiasco, you’d think the company was broke. It's was all a setup for LVA 2.0.
LEC Reps voted for this. Gave up so much money for a quick deal to be made. Envoyed again. Yay! No concessions tho right? Congratulations to the NH’s FO’s coming on board with 900+ 121 time! Force upgrade to Capt! Yay! Come on down grab this bag of money! Make tons of bonus money, plus CA pay upon seat displacement vacancy! Just in time for the market to be flooded with TSH & Mesa pilots looking for a new home. LVA blue print form Air Wisconsin & ExpressJet mass exodus! This is LVA 2.0. Why would Mesa pilots want to come to Envoy again? No one wants to sit reserve in LGA forever. 10 yr flow to American? |
Originally Posted by propellere
(Post 3085334)
Why would Mesa pilots want to come to Envoy again? No one wants to sit reserve in LGA forever. 10 yr flow to American?
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3085511)
We don't hire pilots with DUI's, only CEO's. A large portion of Mesa pilots wouldn't be eligible.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3085511)
We don't hire pilots with DUI's, only CEO's. A large portion of Mesa pilots wouldn't be eligible.
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3085340)
word on the street is LGA is to be shut down in August
|
Originally Posted by coodrough568
(Post 3085340)
word on the street is LGA is to be shut down in August
|
Deleted - posted to wrong thread
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3085511)
We don't hire pilots with DUI's, only CEO's. A large portion of Mesa pilots wouldn't be eligible.
|
Originally Posted by martyByrde
(Post 3085592)
where you hear this?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands