Envoy
09-24-2017, 12:48 PM
#4561
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Originally Posted by Jersdawg
So should we just ignore the warning shot the company tossed at us in the HI6s? P4P's points are all valid. Maybe the union and the company are working on something, but until that announced, folks should prepare accordingly that the vacancies will be assigned per the contract.
09-24-2017, 02:32 PM
#4562
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
First the only basis of information I have is the company hi6 saying to update your displacement bids per 15 G 4. The consensus in this thread is company will force FOs to CA. The ONLY way they can fill the unawarded vacancy is to make FOs to CAs.
Second, I think there was some talk about a program similar to the LTFO but via a LOA. I'm sure they have talked about other options I have no clue about.
Finally, this won't even come close to touching senior FOs. Unless the company goes WAY outside the contract. Per my current understanding of how this should play out.
Again, I have guessed and wondered too much about this. I'm gonna go get a beer and wait for the union to put out something about this.
Second, I think there was some talk about a program similar to the LTFO but via a LOA. I'm sure they have talked about other options I have no clue about.
Finally, this won't even come close to touching senior FOs. Unless the company goes WAY outside the contract. Per my current understanding of how this should play out.
Again, I have guessed and wondered too much about this. I'm gonna go get a beer and wait for the union to put out something about this.
09-24-2017, 03:17 PM
#4564
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Originally Posted by Purpleanga
The company is not going to force FOs to upgrade. That's ridiculous. You upgrade when you're ready.
I'm being told ALPA will be sending out a comm soon addressing this fiasco.
09-24-2017, 03:23 PM
#4565
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 221
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
The company can't just move 175 pilots to ORD. They would first have to take CRJ/145 guys junior to the 175 guys first. This would only affect guys in training right now. Not line pilots. Line pilots will TDY to ORD to fill the void. So essentially all the pilots hired in September and maybe a few in August will get reassigned to 175 ORD. If there were 160pilots I'd guess 100 lines give or take 10.
09-24-2017, 03:42 PM
#4567
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Originally Posted by Dmaxvelo18
So are you saying that NH FO's who are still in training would be reassigned to the 175 ORD FO, regardless of their current equipment and base assignment?
09-24-2017, 03:46 PM
#4568
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Originally Posted by Purpleanga
The company is not going to force FOs to upgrade. That's ridiculous. You upgrade when you're ready.
This isn't something that's far out in left field. The company specifically said to get your displacement bids in pe 15 G 4.
09-24-2017, 04:30 PM
#4569
New Hire
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 1
https://youtu.be/DMJ4DupKiHw
What are these do it yourself tricks Envoy has?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
What are these do it yourself tricks Envoy has?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
09-24-2017, 04:31 PM
#4570
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 388
Originally Posted by Pedro4President
Contractually they can force the upgrade. The company told us to plan on this happening via an HI6 message TWO days ago. I think it is highly probable and problematic if they do this.
This isn't something that's far out in left field. The company specifically said to get your displacement bids in pe 15 G 4.
This isn't something that's far out in left field. The company specifically said to get your displacement bids in pe 15 G 4.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
