SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E
01-03-2019, 08:00 AM
#221
On Reserve
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by drywhitetoast
Sure. The union doesn't want the 200% window to be open because it not supposed to be used as a long term crutch.
"B. The Company and Association recognize the use of this policy is not intended as a long term staffing solution; therefore the Company will notify the MEC Chairman or his designee of the desire to raise the red flag."
"B. The Company and Association recognize the use of this policy is not intended as a long term staffing solution; therefore the Company will notify the MEC Chairman or his designee of the desire to raise the red flag."
01-03-2019, 09:11 AM
#222
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Originally Posted by Xjtcap
Completely incorrect
Many legagcies have rules around limiting open time pick up etc. when people are on furlough. The goal is to increase jobs / keep people equally busy rather than pilling up trips on just a few.
So it is conceivable that 200% is discouraged / not permitted per union rules.
01-03-2019, 09:37 AM
#224
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Originally Posted by TFAYD
It may be incorrect but not unheard off.
Many legagcies have rules around limiting open time pick up etc. when people are on furlough. The goal is to increase jobs / keep people equally busy rather than pilling up trips on just a few.
So it is conceivable that 200% is discouraged / not permitted per union rules.
Many legagcies have rules around limiting open time pick up etc. when people are on furlough. The goal is to increase jobs / keep people equally busy rather than pilling up trips on just a few.
So it is conceivable that 200% is discouraged / not permitted per union rules.
01-03-2019, 11:32 AM
#225
On Reserve
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by TFAYD
It may be incorrect but not unheard off.
Many legagcies have rules around limiting open time pick up etc. when people are on furlough. The goal is to increase jobs / keep people equally busy rather than pilling up trips on just a few.
So it is conceivable that 200% is discouraged / not permitted per union rules.
Many legagcies have rules around limiting open time pick up etc. when people are on furlough. The goal is to increase jobs / keep people equally busy rather than pilling up trips on just a few.
So it is conceivable that 200% is discouraged / not permitted per union rules.
01-03-2019, 03:00 PM
#226
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 803
Originally Posted by Puck Hawg
False. 200% is in the XJT Contract (MOU 21). Chip Childs said he "would rather cancel flights" than to pay 200%. Now, in the coming weeks when there's a new ownership group in charge, that might change.
I was told a pilot said he would do a trip for 200%. CS told him the best they could do was 150%, he told them when they can do 200% to call back. Less than 5 minutes later he received a call from the VP of ops and was screamed at for not helping out.
But then again we have no union protection.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
