Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E >

SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2018, 09:54 AM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
And the guy who did all that was shown the door a long time ago... guess where he ended up... UA...

Negative! The guy who did all that is still at Inc collecting a paycheck, JA. He was president, ceo, and chairman of the board of directors. Sure, it might have been the COO’s (BR) idea but nothing gets done without JA’s permission. Even now, as chairman, this sale was done with his permission.

But the whole point was that xjt losing hundreds of millions of dollars over the last 10+ years was ALL the doing of Skywest.

By the way, BR has been gone from UAL for quite a while now. And JA will never be shown the door until he is good and ready to go, despite his horrendous xjt gambit. Good riddance...
Nevjets is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 10:10 AM
  #132  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by Southern Fried View Post
Nevjets is correct. I was there when it all happened. Most employees on the payroll didn't know the real story from 2008. Skywest negotiated a cpa with CAL before making a bid for XJT to be implemented upon successful acquisition of XJT. When the deal was blocked by the XJT pilot's scope, the cpa was thrust upon XJT by an angry CAL under threat of being shut down. After the XJT BOD accepted the cpa, XJT began losing money and never made a profit going forward. Not long after accepting the cpa, XJT announced the shutdown of it's branded flying and it's Delta flying. The 69 airplanes XJT had retained were then returned to CAL. Furloughs and contract concessions at XJT followed by the fall of 2008. The cpa that Skywest negotiated with CAL was a money losing cpa from the start. When CAL stuck XJT with that cpa the eventual end of XJT was assured. When Skywest (through ASA) acquired XJT in 2010, XJT was operating under the cpa that Skywest negotiated with CAL. Follow this to it's conclusion this week. XJT would never make a profit under the cpa that Skywest negotiated with CAL. Anyone at Skywest that is looking for the blame for XJT losing money need to look no further than who they see in the mirror.
This is all correct. But the only folks who need to look in the mirror are the managers in SGU. None of the pilots had anything to do with it.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 10:14 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
Negative! The guy who did all that is still at Inc collecting a paycheck, JA. He was president, ceo, and chairman of the board of directors. Sure, it might have been the COO’s (BR) idea but nothing gets done without JA’s permission. Even now, as chairman, this sale was done with his permission.

But the whole point was that xjt losing hundreds of millions of dollars over the last 10+ years was ALL the doing of Skywest.

By the way, BR has been gone from UAL for quite a while now. And JA will never be shown the door until he is good and ready to go, despite his horrendous xjt gambit. Good riddance...

Of course JA authorized it. But he hasn’t realy been “in gaged” with OO for a long time. It was BR and he got the swol “retirement”. Page.. anyway. XTJ is in a way better position then now. Tied to only UA flying is a bummer. But it ahould work put for those wanting to spend the last 10-15 years tell retirement.. better then its current trajectory under OO control...
amcnd is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 10:43 AM
  #134  
Remember the Cant...
 
AMNegron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: E145
Posts: 132
Default SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E

Karnik announced as new CEO pending sale. Check XJT home page
AMNegron is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 05:10 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default SkyWest, Inc. Enters into Agreement to Sell E

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
Of course JA authorized it. But he hasn’t realy been “in gaged” with OO for a long time. It was BR and he got the swol “retirement”.

But that wasn’t really the point, was it? The point is that it was Inc (not just BR, who like you said, has been gone for a long time) who had 8 years to right the ship they tried to sink two years before that. People are just pointing out the failure of Inc’s management of xjt and thus the hundreds of millions of dollars lost.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 07:11 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
But that wasn’t really the point, was it? The point is that it was Inc (not just BR, who like you said, has been gone for a long time) who had 8 years to right the ship they tried to sink two years before that. People are just pointing out the failure of Inc’s management of xjt and thus the hundreds of millions of dollars lost.
The point is that INC is not out to get anyone or sink the ship. They are smart business folks. Someone made a mistake by acquiring XJT in the first place and agreeing to an “aspirational” CPA.

Someone build a model in SGU and figured out that they can make money if they improved XJT productivity – probably making assumptions leveraging SKYW metrics. I am sure it assumed “concessions” from all labor groups – not just pilots – like PBS and no more vacation touching etc.

That obviously didn't work out. Good for you for holding on to a good contract but the price for that was that INC eventually switched to an exit strategy – not because they hate unions or want to screw labor but simply because they couldn’t make it work and it distracted senior leadership from their other responsibilities. I don’t think CC enjoyed answering to investors about XJT poor financial performance.

The shift to an exit strategy probably happened 3-4 years ago with the expiration of the UA CPA in sight. At that point, everything became very simply.

Have UA renew at a higher rate or discontinue the CPA. UA didn’t like to get "blackmailed" and they enabled C5.

Eventually it became clear that the C5 experiment didn’t work as well as planned – to a level where C5 could fully take over. At that point UA became interested in retaining XJT. So INC moved from XJT wind down mode to “dressing the bride”.

That involved (1) unwinding all non UA flying – with an unfortunate outcome for the LASA side, (2) getting a future path for dual class aircraft and (3) a new TA that is market competitive and can attract new hires

Now INC is out of the picture - good for you - but I wouldn’t expect rainbows and roses under ManaAir.

Last edited by TFAYD; 12-21-2018 at 07:27 PM.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 07:31 PM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
The point is that INC is not out to get anyone or sink the ship. They are smart business folks. Someone made a mistake by acquiring XJT in the first place and agreeing to an “aspirational” CPA.

Someone build a model in SGU and figured out that they can make money if they improved XJT productivity – probably making assumptions leveraging SKYW metrics. I am sure it assumed “concessions” from all labor groups – not just pilots – like PBS and no more vacation touching etc.

Good for you for holding on to the good contract but the price for that was INC eventually switching from operational improvement mode to a plain and simple exit strategy – not because they hate unions or want to screw labor but simply because they couldn’t make it work and it distracted senior leadership from their other responsibilities. I don’t think CC enjoyed answering to investors about XJT poor financial performance.

The shift to an exit strategy probably happened 3 years ago with the expiration of the UA CPA in sight. At that point, everything became very simply.

Have UA renew at a higher rate or discontinue the CPA? UA didn’t go for it and they enabled C5.

Eventually it became clear that the C5 experiment didn’t work as well as planned – to a level where C5 could fully take over. At that point UA became interested in taking a interest in XJT. So INC moved from XJT wind down mode to “dressing the bride”.

That involved (1) unwinding all non UA flying – with an unfortunate outcome for the LASA side, (2) getting a future path for dual class aircraft and (3) a new TA that is market competitive and can attract new hires

Now INC is out of the picture - good for you - but I wouldn’t expect rainbows and roses under ManaAir.
I’m pretty sure that Inc was just after market share. And I’m pretty sure they knew what they were doing regarding Expressjet. To say that they are brilliant on the non union side, but blundering idiots on the other side doesn’t make sense. we'll probably never know what the actual gains and losses were either as many assets were transferred to the inc side.
gojo is offline  
Old 12-21-2018, 07:44 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
Default

Originally Posted by gojo View Post
I’m pretty sure that Inc was just after market share. And I’m pretty sure they knew what they were doing regarding Expressjet. To say that they are brilliant on the non union side, but blundering idiots on the other side doesn’t make sense. we'll probably never know what the actual gains and losses were either as many assets were transferred to the inc side.
There is no question that INC will always favor the non-union side.

But I doubt they went into the XJT adventure with the intent to run XJT into the ground from the get go. They could have achieved that much faster and more efficiently.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 12-22-2018, 02:19 AM
  #139  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
Default

Originally Posted by Puck Hawg View Post
To be fair, C5 was a sh*tty company with a sh*tty contract and even sh*ttier management to begin with. Now, they have quick upgrades and a quick CPP transition to UA.

At least we are starting out with a good contract.
Acutely you caved in for the airplanes
Melit is offline  
Old 12-22-2018, 03:39 AM
  #140  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by Melit View Post
Acutely you caved in for the airplanes
Not sure who you work for or why you have so much anguish with Xjet. If you are at a regional hasn’t it always been a battle of the lowest bidder to capture flying? Expressjet appears to have held their ground for a lot longer for a better agreement than many other carriers have in the industry.

I have found the xjet crews to be some of finest and most professional pilots I’ve ever met. When I’ve ridden in their junpseats they have been gracious and excellent airman. Never had the eye opening experiences I’ve had on a few of the other carriers. In fact I think they were doing CATII ops long before any other regional. They had the W&B program to get everyone on the plane whereas those same planes when taken from xjet and given to the lowest bidders became weight restricted and incredibly unreliable.

I’m really happy for these pilots. I hope that my company uses them as a direct path to the mainline carrier. I’ve flown with many ex Expressjet pilots and they have all been exemplary.

If you look at most of the notable news events of poor customer service on express flights it’s almost invariably a Republic flight. I’ve ridden in the back on a few Republic flights and can see why they rank low. The xjet crews in cabin also seem more polished and customer oriented.

Congratulations to the Expressjet crews and hope you guys and gals get a bigger slice of the pie as the other UAX contracts come up for renewal. And may all your pilots find a path to the place they want to be in their careers.
PDRit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
10296
07-10-2015 01:42 PM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
194
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices