63 cancels - 50 for crew
03-17-2019, 08:32 AM
#12
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Originally Posted by Melit
Seriously everyone is hiring go somewhere else. Exjet is a dumpster fire
03-17-2019, 08:37 AM
#13
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Originally Posted by KCaviator
Wonder when United will realize that contracting with bottom feeder regionals isn’t the greatest idea for their product/passengers. I guess you get what you pay for. 🤣🤣🤣
03-17-2019, 08:55 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Originally Posted by Excargodog
Where you want to be right now, if you desire a career in the 121 world, is somewhere that they are short of pilots and are going to work your butt off. Someplace that will get you through training promptly and get you out on the line, that will get you a line, and then fly your butt 83.33 hours a month until you have the 1000 you need to upgrade and then will STILL work your butt off until you've got the 1000 TPIC that'll let you move up to an airline that's actually a career destination. And get there on the leading edge of the wave rather than forever be stuck behind the seniority of those who did.
03-17-2019, 09:11 AM
#15
Remember the Cant...
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: E145
Posts: 132
OP, why are you even surprised? GW sent a MyMessage last week about how there was too much flying assigned and it was straining the system. Besides, nothing we can do about it...this is management’s problem. Fly safely out there every one.
03-17-2019, 09:16 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 112
Originally Posted by KCaviator
Wonder when United will realize that contracting with bottom feeder regionals isn’t the greatest idea for their product/passengers. I guess you get what you pay for. 🤣🤣🤣
03-17-2019, 09:31 AM
#17
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Originally Posted by CanWeGetTheLeft
Expressjet is the categorical opposite of a “bottom feeder.”
03-17-2019, 10:59 AM
#19
Standby Reserve at LGA
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 171
Cancelling for crew is a signal for new hires that this is a place that needs pilots and will offer plenty of flying.
In the regional world, that is most people's top priority: flying a lot.
I would much rather be here and see them cancelling for crew than be at a regional with too many pilots who sit reserve for 12 months, flying 20-30 hours per month.
In the regional world, that is most people's top priority: flying a lot.
I would much rather be here and see them cancelling for crew than be at a regional with too many pilots who sit reserve for 12 months, flying 20-30 hours per month.
03-17-2019, 11:07 AM
#20
Currently Furloughed
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: C172 Captain
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by SpringLanding
Cancelling for crew is a signal for new hires that this is a place that needs pilots and will offer plenty of flying.
In the regional world, that is most people's top priority: flying a lot.
I would much rather be here and see them cancelling for crew than be at a regional with too many pilots who sit reserve for 12 months, flying 20-30 hours per month.
In the regional world, that is most people's top priority: flying a lot.
I would much rather be here and see them cancelling for crew than be at a regional with too many pilots who sit reserve for 12 months, flying 20-30 hours per month.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
