E175 Routes?
#44
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 130
I didn't say they were taking Mesa's... it was an example and i even stated that example to get my point across that transferred existing airplanes is not "New additional expansion" and not part of the Skywest deal..United can do whatever they want with all their existing planes when contracts expire. Skywest deal is for 25 "NEW ADDITIONAL AIRCRAFT EXPANSION ABOVE CURRENT SCOPE" Meaning Skywest has to rely on Ual getting scope relief. But you still don't get it... im done talking with guys with double digit IQ's Everyone else on here seems to be intelligent with triple digit IQ's
Last edited by FlyingMaryJane; 04-17-2019 at 06:11 PM.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 200
melit, you're as crazy as a run over dog. Please don't stop saying stupid things. I always need a good laugh.
melit, I'll bet you $5 that SkyWest will never see another E-175 for United.
In case some of ya'll missed it, Scott Kirby stated United needs to own its own feed.
I do see another carrier losing airplanes that may come to Expressjet.
701EV
melit, I'll bet you $5 that SkyWest will never see another E-175 for United.
In case some of ya'll missed it, Scott Kirby stated United needs to own its own feed.
I do see another carrier losing airplanes that may come to Expressjet.
701EV
#47
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 873
melit, you're as crazy as a run over dog. Please don't stop saying stupid things. I always need a good laugh.
melit, I'll bet you $5 that SkyWest will never see another E-175 for United.
In case some of ya'll missed it, Scott Kirby stated United needs to own its own feed.
I do see another carrier losing airplanes that may come to Expressjet.
701EV
melit, I'll bet you $5 that SkyWest will never see another E-175 for United.
In case some of ya'll missed it, Scott Kirby stated United needs to own its own feed.
I do see another carrier losing airplanes that may come to Expressjet.
701EV
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post