Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > > >
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-2018, 05:29 PM   #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIFLYR View Post
Nothing against military guys and gals, respect the service for us. However those 2500 hr RJ guys are working in the system we operate in everday and probably doing wing low cross wind landings to boot. Just Saying
Completely agree, 100%. I was one of them. All civilian here. However, 2500TT with zero 121 TPIC and sitting in class at UAL/DAL... I donít know if Iím entirely onboard with that. My 2000 hours TPIC as an RJ captain and eventually LCA, was invaluable.
Rsv4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:34 PM   #12  
Thx Age 65
 
HoursHore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: MD11CAP
Posts: 870
Default

Guys lose money after year two if they drop FDX trips for mil. As a guy who flies with many new guys, I'd say it's 60-40 mil-civ, with many already having a mixed back ground, i.e. FDX isn't their first rodeo. Pretty sure there is no boogeyman pulling the strings to keep mil guys out.
HoursHore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:36 PM   #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777F FO
Posts: 3,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rsv4lyfe View Post
However, 2500TT with zero 121 TPIC and sitting in class at UAL/DAL... I donít know if Iím entirely onboard with that.
What, exactly, are you not onboard with?
Adlerdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:46 PM   #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Airbus Captain
Posts: 1,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
What does this even mean?
Many of the AOA Types have not done a winglow crosswond landing in many years. These are the types of crosswind landings we do. I did not realize the C17 does not also past a certain flap setting, untill I was working with a C17 guy on his crosswind landings.
HIFLYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 05:57 PM   #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Captain
Posts: 250
Default

multiple threads ? venting ? axe to grind ?
BarrySeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 06:42 PM   #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
What, exactly, are you not onboard with?
I think having some TPIC, when there military or civilian is an invaluable experience. Iíve alwags thought people hired at the majors without it missed out on a great opportunity for professsional growth.
Rsv4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 07:11 PM   #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777F FO
Posts: 3,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rsv4lyfe View Post
I think having some TPIC, when there military or civilian is an invaluable experience. Iíve alwags thought people hired at the majors without it missed out on a great opportunity for professsional growth.
Your statement specified 121 TPIC. So, you made it sound like you had some issue with a mil guy with plenty of PIC time just not 121 PIC sitting in a UAL/DAL class.
Adlerdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 07:14 PM   #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777F FO
Posts: 3,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HIFLYR View Post
Many of the AOA Types have not done a winglow crosswond landing in many years. These are the types of crosswind landings we do. I did not realize the C17 does not also past a certain flap setting, untill I was working with a C17 guy on his crosswind landings.
I figured it was something like that. Ok, pardon me while a scoff a little. This "system" we all operate in now is hardly as challenging as you're making it out to be.

As far as cross-wind landings? We're talking basic flight control inputs. You really think it's valid to turn away someone with loads of experience because they lack recency in something as basic as a cross-wind landing? I seriously doubt the majority of guys coming here from whatever background are going to find a basic cross-wind landing that difficult. You want to give me an exception to the rule story about some "AOA Type" that had a tough time with cross-winds in a heavy transport category aircraft? Whatever. I'm sure we can find an RJ guy who struggled with that or something else. I know a few of the one's I've flown with recently could use some remedial radio training. But there's the 5% in every group.

Plenty of "value" in a mix of new hires from various prior walks of aviation life.
Adlerdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 07:17 PM   #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
Your statement specified 121 TPIC. So, you made it sound like you had some issue with a mil guy with plenty of PIC time just not 121 PIC sitting in a UAL/DAL class.
Oh no. I meant a civilian with 2500TT and no TPIC.

Big difference. Sorry for the confusion.
Rsv4lyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 07:28 PM   #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Airbus Captain
Posts: 1,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
I figured it was something like that. Ok, pardon me while a scoff a little. This "system" we all operate in now is hardly as challenging as you're making it out to be.

As far as cross-wind landings? We're talking basic flight control inputs. You really think it's valid to turn away someone with loads of experience because they lack recency in something as basic as a cross-wind landing? I seriously doubt the majority of guys coming here from whatever background are going to find a basic cross-wind landing that difficult. You want to give me an exception to the rule story about some "AOA Type" that had a tough time with cross-winds in a heavy transport category aircraft? Whatever. I'm sure we can find an RJ guy who struggled with that or something else. I know a few of the one's I've flown with recently could use some remedial radio training. But there's the 5% in every group.

Plenty of "value" in a mix of new hires from various prior walks of aviation life.
I never said that the guy was using 2500 hr RJ guys being hired as a bad thing over a few mil guys. Think what ever you want. Just pointing out the RJ guys and gals are not second tier. When our job becomes air to air combat or low attitude support for ground troops then mil rules but that is not our job. I have trained both mil and civies who had problems with crosswind landings.
HIFLYR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply

Tags
fedex, military, new hire
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fedex lessons ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE Cargo 22 06-04-2008 01:16 PM
FedEx Companies vagabond Cargo 15 03-18-2007 03:50 PM
FedEx to Modernize Retirement Plans?!?!?!?! angry tanker Cargo 91 03-08-2007 08:56 AM
FedEx profits jump 51% SWAjet Major 0 03-17-2005 05:36 PM
FedEx Starts Daily Frankfurt-Shanghai RockBottom Major 0 03-05-2005 04:12 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 AM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2019, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1