Originally Posted by Anthrax
(Post 2745227)
It must be exhausting always trying to be the reasonable voice on the internet. exhausting.
My point on the latest was "pick your battle". I have heard another VP will be going to the MD-11 and get a seniority number. I guess we'll see... |
Originally Posted by HIFLYR
(Post 2745146)
There is a currency requirement to be considered for a interview. In the past some people hired as pro sim instructors who were type rated instruct and maintain a currency in a FedEx sim were considered to meet that requirement. This is has changed for them and any non internal person has to meet the currency requirement. This is hardly a secret.
Tony also fails to answer how a provision that has never been implemented has cost us one hotel room or one sleep room to date. Done with this thread Tony can tilt at imaginary windmills all he wants. |
Originally Posted by Albief15
(Post 2745279)
Beats trying to write a book. Kudos to your efforts there. Your points on Jetflyers are always well taken--when your name is visible your skill and intelligent arguments show. When you sling venom at guys going through divorce or being the king of snark hiding behind an anonymous screen name the points fade into just more noise.
My point on the latest was "pick your battle". I have heard another VP will be going to the MD-11 and get a seniority number. I guess we'll see... |
Originally Posted by Fdxlag2
(Post 2745315)
If it is well known what is it, six weeks, six months, or six years? And is the VP of Flight Ops a non internal employee? Did the rules change for a Pro hired under one set of rules retroactively? Are any of us privledged to know the package the VPFO was offered when he was hired? Pretty sure he met the currency requirements when he interviewed. What do we lose by the VPFO getting a line number? And once again my question remains, what contractual change in contract 202X do you want to see that will prevent this from happening again?. This was the question that I asked that fired up Tony’s whiney snark machine. He and Pin have failed to answer it.
Tony also fails to answer how a provision that has never been implemented has cost us one hotel room or one sleep room to date. Done with this thread Tony can tilt at imaginary windmills all he wants. It's hysterical seeing you complain about someone being a whiney snark machine. Since you are done with this thread, see ya Mr, Q.:D |
Originally Posted by Albief15
(Post 2745279)
Beats trying to write a book. Kudos to your efforts there. Your points on Jetflyers are always well taken--when your name is visible your skill and intelligent arguments show. When you sling venom at guys going through divorce or being the king of snark hiding behind an anonymous screen name the points fade into just more noise.
My point on the latest was "pick your battle". I have heard another VP will be going to the MD-11 and get a seniority number. I guess we'll see... |
Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
(Post 2745337)
Well said. Agree 100%.
|
Originally Posted by Anthrax
(Post 2745417)
and you, shut up!
-UA |
Originally Posted by pinseeker
(Post 2745385)
Actually, Tony did answer that question. I didn't realize you wanted an answer from me specifically.
It's hysterical seeing you complain about someone being a whiney snark machine. Since you are done with this thread, see ya Mr, Q.:D |
Originally Posted by UnusualAttitude
(Post 2745423)
What happened to the namaste?
-UA |
Originally Posted by Fdxlag2
(Post 2745315)
Done with this thread ....
Originally Posted by Fdxlag2
(Post 2745443)
I guess I’m back. So which of his proposals would have prevented the company from hiring a VP? Yeah you’re right none of them.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands