FDX Cost Reduction Actions
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
FDX Cost Reduction Actions
As you're probably aware, purple stock is taking a huge beating lately. This is part of what was released today along with earnings below forecast.
Cost-Reduction Actions
In addition to lowering variable compensation, FedEx is implementing other cost-reduction initiatives to mitigate below-plan performance. These actions include:
Cost-Reduction Actions
In addition to lowering variable compensation, FedEx is implementing other cost-reduction initiatives to mitigate below-plan performance. These actions include:
- A voluntary buyout program for eligible employees
- International network capacity reductions at FedEx Express
- Limited hiring in staff functions
- Reductions in discretionary spending
- Efforts to improve productivity will continue, including expanding the use of technology and capitalizing on efficiencies available through network scale.
#3
Opening paragraph "From FedEx is unable to forecast the fiscal 2019 year-end mark-to-market (MTM) retirement plan accounting adjustments"
From 2015: https://www.auditanalytics.com/blog/...ark-to-market/
So, they adopted a fancy new accounting method for retirements and now it's causing problems. A whole accounting firm can't figure out the mess and I don't think a retirement advisor and a pilot can get it right either.
From 2015: https://www.auditanalytics.com/blog/...ark-to-market/
So, they adopted a fancy new accounting method for retirements and now it's causing problems. A whole accounting firm can't figure out the mess and I don't think a retirement advisor and a pilot can get it right either.
#5
Unable to forecast MTM Pension predictions and you’re slamming the VB plan...in case you haven’t noticed
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546
Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.
And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.
And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit
And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.
This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546
Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.
And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.
And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit
And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.
This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
#7
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Unable to forecast MTM Pension predictions and you’re slamming the VB plan...in case you haven’t noticed
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546
Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.
And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.
And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit
And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.
This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546
Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.
And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.
And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit
And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.
This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
The stabilization fund has to be paid for somehow. Mediocre returns for several years that don’t fund the stabilization fund could be a problem. What I worry about with the concept is that the stabilization fund could become like social security—under funded and paid for by current workers. In a system like that, there is a good chance the fund or VRB itself could go insolvent?
#10
Beaches and Sand
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
The stabilization fund has to be paid for somehow. Mediocre returns for several years that don’t fund the stabilization fund could be a problem. What I worry about with the concept is that the stabilization fund could become like social security—under funded and paid for by current workers. In a system like that, there is a good chance the fund or VRB itself could go insolvent?
This is exactly what will happen. I truly hope we don't fall for the new, latest, and dressed up turd. But there is truth behind the phrase "A fool and his money are soon parted".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post