Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
FDX Cost Reduction Actions >

FDX Cost Reduction Actions

Search
Notices

FDX Cost Reduction Actions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2018, 12:46 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
Default FDX Cost Reduction Actions

As you're probably aware, purple stock is taking a huge beating lately. This is part of what was released today along with earnings below forecast.

Cost-Reduction Actions
In addition to lowering variable compensation, FedEx is implementing other cost-reduction initiatives to mitigate below-plan performance. These actions include:
  • A voluntary buyout program for eligible employees
  • International network capacity reductions at FedEx Express
  • Limited hiring in staff functions
  • Reductions in discretionary spending
  • Efforts to improve productivity will continue, including expanding the use of technology and capitalizing on efficiencies available through network scale.
https://www.streetinsider.com/Earnin.../14934836.html
rvfanatic is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 12:56 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
Default

And day old shrimp at the buffet.
Fdxlag2 is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 03:20 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD11HOG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 653
Default

Opening paragraph "From FedEx is unable to forecast the fiscal 2019 year-end mark-to-market (MTM) retirement plan accounting adjustments"
From 2015: https://www.auditanalytics.com/blog/...ark-to-market/
So, they adopted a fancy new accounting method for retirements and now it's causing problems. A whole accounting firm can't figure out the mess and I don't think a retirement advisor and a pilot can get it right either.
MD11HOG is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 03:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Maybe we should read a book about retirement income written by a guy no one ever heard of and tell the company we want to give away our A plan, that should help.
HDawg is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 04:41 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Unable to forecast MTM Pension predictions and you’re slamming the VB plan...in case you haven’t noticed
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546

Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.

And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.

And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit

And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.

This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
kronan is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 04:51 PM
  #6  
Beaches and Sand
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
Default

That's why you keep your pension and cash the checks while sipping umbrella drinks from your Sailboat in the Caribbean. No VariableScamPlan for me. Don't even peddle that my way.
kc10/c130 is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 04:51 PM
  #7  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post

This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.


And it's exactly why we should be opposed to assuming the risk of market uncertainty ourselves.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 12-18-2018, 06:47 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Unable to forecast MTM Pension predictions and you’re slamming the VB plan...in case you haven’t noticed
During the past 3 months stock markets been pretty volatile.
DOW’s bounced from 26,893 to 23,675
S&P from 2934 to 2546

Shoot, over the past quarter FedEx bought 2.8M shares of FedEx at an average price of $228.30 and today’s close was 185. Doing that math means FedEx “paid” 639.38M for stock that’s “worth” 518.028M today.

And even with all of those big number losses, the biggest impact will be the funding level of our Pension assets...no impact on the actual pension checks.

And if the VB had been implemented a year ago for those retiring Dec 31st. Their Floor Pension check would be 2% of their pensionable earnings...not 2% plus a little bit of market return above 5%...simply the floor benefit

And their Legacy A plan check wouldn’t be impacted at all.

This market uncertainty is one reason FedEx was so adamantly opposed to improving our Legacy Pension last time.
Are you even listening to yourself? So if I’m understanding you correct, even in a down market the VB Plan is better? If that’s your position, you sure need to visit a psychologist.
StarClipper is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 03:59 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
Default

The stabilization fund has to be paid for somehow. Mediocre returns for several years that don’t fund the stabilization fund could be a problem. What I worry about with the concept is that the stabilization fund could become like social security—under funded and paid for by current workers. In a system like that, there is a good chance the fund or VRB itself could go insolvent?
Raptor is offline  
Old 12-19-2018, 05:31 AM
  #10  
Beaches and Sand
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
Default

Originally Posted by Raptor View Post
The stabilization fund has to be paid for somehow. Mediocre returns for several years that don’t fund the stabilization fund could be a problem. What I worry about with the concept is that the stabilization fund could become like social security—under funded and paid for by current workers. In a system like that, there is a good chance the fund or VRB itself could go insolvent?
Raptor-

This is exactly what will happen. I truly hope we don't fall for the new, latest, and dressed up turd. But there is truth behind the phrase "A fool and his money are soon parted".
kc10/c130 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DLax85
FedEx
52
02-04-2016 06:02 PM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
54
12-22-2008 10:17 AM
SWAjet
Major
1
09-21-2005 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices