Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Chairman's Message-05/16/19 >

Chairman's Message-05/16/19

Search
Notices

Chairman's Message-05/16/19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2019, 03:04 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by NoHaz View Post
Yeah I was surprised toö and a call to the duty officer and grievance confirmed it is all agreed to procedures. Even the midnight call to both my cell and wife's cell was okay. They can't interrupt your rest if you are at the hotel on a layover but, a 'courtesy' call during your 1n7 to let you know you have a crew notification is apparently okay. Again, doesn't seem very r-24ish
I never answer the call from CRS unless I am contractually required too when working, especially on RSV. In my experience if it’s good they will leave a msg.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 05-25-2019, 05:44 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by CHP1 View Post
If I were a new hire here, with let's say a 30 year active career followed by possibly a 20 to 25 year retirement to fund (self and or spouse), I would be adamant that the union explore other retirement options. A new guy could possibly be "married" to FedEx for 50+ years. With everything that could happen in the air cargo world, i.e. the Amazon/Bezos issue, pilotless cargo airplanes, E. Musk exploring high speed underground transportation tubes, I think I would want as much money in my name/control that doesn't rely on the decades long profitable viability of FedEx, with a big Bfund with cash over cap as the front runner of retirement options. Something to consider.
Not Purple, pardon the intrusion, but what are the FedEx demographics? important in any negotiation to properly focus needs and resources. Not looking for anything actually posted, that's for your pilot group to understand. Would throw a guess most new hires are not in 20's or 30's. Our median age is in the low 50's and includes lots of 40's+ new hires. Only about 10 percent actually in 30's. Additionally, DBP plans are funded in a manner that can survive the demise of our profession. Much depends on how it is contractually arranged. Certainly could go like the DOD and split new folks off into a separate retirement plan as of XX date. Current folks keep same plan, new folks get a "blended" plan, regardless of age. I want to keep my DBP at my current abode though. DCP takes care of individual investing styles.
Good negotiations. We all need each other backs in the industry.
SD
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 08:00 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Originally Posted by FrankTheTank View Post
The new hire is a red herring.. This is really about the 25+ year crowd that want more..

There are more solutions (or possible) solutions than cashing in (freezing) the A Plan..
Have to laugh at this one.

Because you know, improving the FAE calculation does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd.
Switching over to the Big B Cash over Cap B plan I hear a few folks saying we should pursue does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd (reality is that a Big B plan doesn't come close to matching the value of our current Mix)
;-)

We're not Cashing in or trading one plan for another.
Just trying to come up with a different way to calculate future benefits.

Podcast outlined a change\improvement previously undiscussed, and not modeled in any way by "The Modeler". But one in which those folks who choose Seniority over $$, choose to work 70% of their line, would still wind up with the Same FAE*2% calculation we have now.

IOW-(S) VBP has a new line inserted into how your Benefits would be calculated.
We have the Pension Benefit being the Greater of the Value of our Pancakes * asset value (the secret sauce of Market returns in excess of 5%) OR the Accumulated Floor benefit (2% of W2 compensation added up year by year) OR The greater of our (S) VBP + Frozen A plan compensation as compared with the YOS*FAE*2%.


Again, comments made that there's NO way such a lookback provision is affordable and Mgt Will Never agree to it.

Seems diametrically opposed to the comments that the (S) VBP is a HUUUUUGGGGE give away and Mgt is salivating as they contemplate the savings to be gained.

Which then goes onto the We Need to Fix our current A plan by upping the FAE cap and YOS.
kronan is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 08:04 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog View Post
Not Purple, pardon the intrusion, but what are the FedEx demographics? important in any negotiation to properly focus needs and resources. Not looking for anything actually posted, that's for your pilot group to understand. Would throw a guess most new hires are not in 20's or 30's. Our median age is in the low 50's and includes lots of 40's+ new hires. Only about 10 percent actually in 30's. Additionally, DBP plans are funded in a manner that can survive the demise of our profession. Much depends on how it is contractually arranged. Certainly could go like the DOD and split new folks off into a separate retirement plan as of XX date. Current folks keep same plan, new folks get a "blended" plan, regardless of age. I want to keep my DBP at my current abode though. DCP takes care of individual investing styles.
Good negotiations. We all need each other backs in the industry.
SD
We're like you in that our ages vary. We have some folks, many AD retirees who're hired late 40s or early 50s.

2-3 years ago we received the actual demographics\current Pension actuarial data, but it's covered by an NDA.

So, no true way for a lineswine guy to evaluate the various options bandied about on the internet. Only the Union gurus were given a peek behind the curtain, and they opted for a Variable Benefit option.

Leaned away from the FDA calculation UPS uses for a one and done method versus needing to renegotiate it each year.
kronan is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 08:05 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

And SaltyDog,

no need to apologize for the Intrusion. Can't think of a single comment\post you've made that hasn't been worth reading.
kronan is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 09:35 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 936
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post

... (reality is that a Big B plan doesn't come close to matching the value of our current Mix)...
;-)
Add the words “today” to your statement and you are correct. But 25 years from now the $260k capped A Plan will be worth about $80k annually in 2045 dollars. That is the whole reason we are having the discussion about giving away our A Plan. And again the big cash plan has other values that a stack of pancakes does not.
Fdxlag2 is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 09:35 AM
  #47  
Fill'er Up Again
 
FrankTheTank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Scarebus Captain
Posts: 1,089
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Have to laugh at this one.

Because you know, improving the FAE calculation does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd.
Switching over to the Big B Cash over Cap B plan I hear a few folks saying we should pursue does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd (reality is that a Big B plan doesn't come close to matching the value of our current Mix)
;-)

We're not Cashing in or trading one plan for another.
Just trying to come up with a different way to calculate future benefits.

Podcast outlined a change\improvement previously undiscussed, and not modeled in any way by "The Modeler". But one in which those folks who choose Seniority over $$, choose to work 70% of their line, would still wind up with the Same FAE*2% calculation we have now.

IOW-(S) VBP has a new line inserted into how your Benefits would be calculated.
We have the Pension Benefit being the Greater of the Value of our Pancakes * asset value (the secret sauce of Market returns in excess of 5%) OR the Accumulated Floor benefit (2% of W2 compensation added up year by year) OR The greater of our (S) VBP + Frozen A plan compensation as compared with the YOS*FAE*2%.


Again, comments made that there's NO way such a lookback provision is affordable and Mgt Will Never agree to it.

Seems diametrically opposed to the comments that the (S) VBP is a HUUUUUGGGGE give away and Mgt is salivating as they contemplate the savings to be gained.

Which then goes onto the We Need to Fix our current A plan by upping the FAE cap and YOS.
Keep chasing those rainbows...
FrankTheTank is offline  
Old 05-26-2019, 04:44 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by kronan View Post
Have to laugh at this one.

Because you know, improving the FAE calculation does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd.
Switching over to the Big B Cash over Cap B plan I hear a few folks saying we should pursue does absolutely nothing for the 25+ year crowd (reality is that a Big B plan doesn't come close to matching the value of our current Mix)
;-)

We're not Cashing in or trading one plan for another.
Just trying to come up with a different way to calculate future benefits.

Podcast outlined a change\improvement previously undiscussed, and not modeled in any way by "The Modeler". But one in which those folks who choose Seniority over $$, choose to work 70% of their line, would still wind up with the Same FAE*2% calculation we have now.

IOW-(S) VBP has a new line inserted into how your Benefits would be calculated.
We have the Pension Benefit being the Greater of the Value of our Pancakes * asset value (the secret sauce of Market returns in excess of 5%) OR the Accumulated Floor benefit (2% of W2 compensation added up year by year) OR The greater of our (S) VBP + Frozen A plan compensation as compared with the YOS*FAE*2%.


Again, comments made that there's NO way such a lookback provision is affordable and Mgt Will Never agree to it.

Seems diametrically opposed to the comments that the (S) VBP is a HUUUUUGGGGE give away and Mgt is salivating as they contemplate the savings to be gained.

Which then goes onto the We Need to Fix our current A plan by upping the FAE cap and YOS.
I’m sort of having a problem understanding your point here.

I’m for higher FAE or higher multiplier, significantly increased B plan, and/or a real profit sharing plan. The Variable plan is a turd that most people don’t want. If we’re still paying Blitzstein and Cheiron, let’s stop now.

I still want to know the cost to change the high 5 from 260k to 300-320k. If the numbers are truly impossible, let’s see them and move on to other tried and true ideas.
golfandfly is offline  
Old 05-27-2019, 07:08 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,061
Default

Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 View Post
Add the words “today” to your statement and you are correct. But 25 years from now the $260k capped A Plan will be worth about $80k annually in 2045 dollars. That is the whole reason we are having the discussion about giving away our A Plan. And again the big cash plan has other values that a stack of pancakes does not.
Our original A-plan paid out about 90k a year but had a COLA. so we r right back where we started...but without the COLA. we play checkers while they play chess.
MEMA300 is online now  
Old 05-28-2019, 04:34 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 View Post
Add the words “today” to your statement and you are correct. But 25 years from now the $260k capped A Plan will be worth about $80k annually in 2045 dollars. That is the whole reason we are having the discussion about giving away our A Plan. And again the big cash plan has other values that a stack of pancakes does not.
25 years from now the A plan will still pay 130k, just will be attainable with NB FO pay and the FAE cap will probably be achieved by year 7
:-)

B plan contributions will continue to grow along with the DC limit.

Frozen A plan plus Growing B plan contributions still exceed even that of a 20% B plan only.

Assuming a 4% withdrawal rate, need a 29% B plan to equalize the same Cash flow in retirement 25 years from Now. (Doesn't Take taxes into consideration though, and assumes every penny of that 29% gets saved somehow)

Yes, all of the B plan cash is yours to leave to your heirs in a way A plan pension payments are not.

But, Pension payment is for life. Quite possible to spend all of your B plan cash and wind up with one heck of a lifestyle change. People can spend an amazing amount of money. Even worse, Elder scams aren't all that uncommon.

Want to leave more money for your heirs? Dedicate X dollars out of your Pension to buy non-dividend stocks such as BRKB in a brokerage account with your heirs as beneficiaries so that they can take advantage of the step-up provisions (assuming those still exist in 25 years)

Can't outlive a stack of pancakes.
kronan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frozenboxhauler
Cargo
144
10-18-2014 04:46 PM
Baja
Cargo
11
09-04-2014 07:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices