Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Pilotless cargo ops

Old 10-14-2019, 05:20 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 825
Default Pilotless cargo ops

Former Fedex exec just joined sabrewing as they push for autonomous cargo ops.

https://www.suasnews.com/2019/10/sab...eid=6cfaba5001
NoHaz is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 06:55 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by NoHaz View Post
Former Fedex exec just joined sabrewing as they push for autonomous cargo ops.

https://www.suasnews.com/2019/10/sab...eid=6cfaba5001

The fears of those that come after us. the amount of R&D and testing that will go into this will take years to complete
Jma313 is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 08:35 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 204
Default

Their prototype for a “large cargo drone” will have a payload capacity of 1200lbs in a VTOL configuration or 6000lbs in a traditional plane configuration and a range of 1000 miles. So this would be the Cessna Caravan replacement essentially.
whataclub is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 08:49 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,621
Default

I'm looking at that design and I'm thinking how will that get certified?

If you lose one motor in the VTOL phases of flight it crashes. This is by design not safe.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 07:51 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
I'm looking at that design and I'm thinking how will that get certified?

If you lose one motor in the VTOL phases of flight it crashes. This is by design not safe.
If it crashes in the middle of an open field (airport) and no pilots are on board it’s just a cost of doing business.

I’m not saying it’s smart or advocating for the idea, but for certification who cares.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 04:55 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by gatorhater View Post
If it crashes in the middle of an open field (airport) and no pilots are on board it’s just a cost of doing business.

I’m not saying it’s smart or advocating for the idea, but for certification who cares.
Yes but when it falls on someone and kills them? I don't think there will be much demand to deliver to the middle of unpopulated areas.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 10-15-2019, 05:03 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,221
Default

Sabrewing’s “Rhaegal” air vehicle contains a turbo-electric drivetrain that is capable of taking off and landing vertically – in mud, snow, ice, deep sand or unimproved landing areas – and can fly at speeds of up to 200 knots (370 km/hr), and in weather that is all but impossible for manned aircraft.
I want to see that!
trip is offline  
Old 10-16-2019, 04:21 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR View Post
Yes but when it falls on someone and kills them? I don't think there will be much demand to deliver to the middle of unpopulated areas.
I agree. In VTOL mode, and the places it would land I don’t see it being an economical solution. In a ‘standard’ configuration it might be economical, but then you have to deal with the people under the flight path.

While small single package drones carrying 15 lbs and flying a couple miles could change the last mile delivery system and bigger drones may change the regional spokes (ie our current caravans from MEM-LIT) and local trucks from airport to distribution center. Maybe that doesn’t even work since a truck can certainly haul a load more economically than 15 drone flights.


I just don’t see a threat to larger aircraft into airports with large population density at the perimeter. However, I’ve never really been accused of being a creative visionary so we’ll just have to wait and see.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 10-16-2019, 09:14 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,621
Default

I think the biggest threat to these UAS are hacking/hijacking and jamming which present several problems for the companies trying to put these into service. How can they ensure these drones can’t be taken control of remotely and used as weapons? They can’t.
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 10-22-2019, 07:30 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,178
Default

Leave it to human beings to create machines that would replace us in the work place. People are dumb.
SoFloFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Safety
0
06-14-2012 03:24 PM
Zoso
Cargo
69
05-28-2012 02:05 AM
kevinc5
Cargo
4
07-01-2007 04:17 PM
northeastbound
Part 135
12
12-01-2006 07:31 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
1
05-21-2006 09:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices