1500 Multi-engine requirement?!
#21
No thanks, I won’t waste my time because I don’t care and I’m not trying to make a problem where there isn’t. 99% of whoever I fly with, F-16, C-5, civilian are a pleasure to work with and all very competent. Must be tough flying or typing with that chip on your shoulder there Ace. Give it rest.
#22
#23
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,906
I’ve been an instructor for what seems like a gazillion years. Gotta tell ya TiredSoul, from my experience as an instructor both aircraft and simulator, its always been a nonevent event training single engine to multi engine through training. Doesn’t make a difference be it single engine piston or turbine to multi engine turbine.
What’s the old adage??? Ah yes... now I remember... “Working foot working motor... dead foot... dead motor.”
Multi engine flying is multi engine flying... no difference be it piston or turbine. Its a combination of the delivery of instruction and the motivation of the studen to learn.
What’s the old adage??? Ah yes... now I remember... “Working foot working motor... dead foot... dead motor.”
Multi engine flying is multi engine flying... no difference be it piston or turbine. Its a combination of the delivery of instruction and the motivation of the studen to learn.
Last edited by captjns; 10-20-2019 at 05:59 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AllyHigh
Flight Schools and Training
22
04-17-2018 01:52 AM